Experimental optical phase measurement at the exact Heisenberg limit (Conference Presentation)

Optical phase measurement through its application in quantum metrology has pushed the precision limit with which some physical quantities can be measured accurately. At the very fundamental level, the laws of quantum mechanics dictate that the uncertainty in phase estimations scales as 1/N, where N is the number of quantum resources employed in the protocol [1]. This is the well known Heisenberg limit (HL) which is quadratically better than the traditional precision limit known as the standard quantum limit (SQL) with uncertainty asymptotically scaling as 1/sqrt{N} [1]. Several experiments have demonstrated that the SQL can be beaten by using an entangled state as the probe and a specific measurement scheme for ab initio estimation of unknown phases [2,3]. It has also been shown experimentally that even in the absence of the entanglement one can measure an unknown phase with imprecision scaling at the HL [4]. In this work we first present a new protocol able to estimate an optical phase at the Heisenberg limit, and then experimentally explore fundamental and practical issues in generating high-quality novel entangled states, for use in this protocol and beyond. Our aim in this study is to measure an unknown phase in the interval [0,2pi) with uncertainty attaining the exact HL. There is a condition that should be met to address this objective: preparation of an optimal state [5]. This would cover part of the presentation through which we explain how to experimentally realise such an optimal state with the current technological limitations and the feasibility of the scheme. In particular, we generate an entangled 3-photon (2-photon) state of specific superposition of GHZ (Bell) states. Our numerical simulation of the phase measurement gate together with the experimental outcomes show that the created state should have a high fidelity and purity to be able to have the phase uncertainty achieving the exact HL. Therefore, we briefly explain the modelling for experimental imperfections and finally present the results of experimental phase measurements.

[1]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 1998 .

[2]  John Rarity,et al.  Sub-Shot-Noise Transmission Measurement Enabled by Active Feed-Forward of Heralded Single Photons , 2017 .

[3]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Advances in quantum metrology , 2011, 1102.2318.

[4]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[5]  Dominic Berry Adaptive Phase Measurements , 2002 .

[6]  J. Rarity,et al.  Demonstrating an absolute quantum advantage in direct absorption measurement , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[7]  V. Verma,et al.  Unconditional violation of the shot-noise limit in photonic quantum metrology , 2017, 1707.08977.

[8]  H M Wiseman,et al.  Entanglement-enhanced measurement of a completely unknown phase , 2010, CLEO/QELS: 2010 Laser Science to Photonic Applications.

[9]  Keiji Sasaki,et al.  Beating the Standard Quantum Limit with Four-Entangled Photons , 2007, Science.

[10]  Griffiths,et al.  Semiclassical Fourier transform for quantum computation. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[11]  A. S. Holevo,et al.  Covariant measurements and imprimitivity systems , 1984 .

[12]  Timothy C. Ralph,et al.  Optical quantum computation , 2011 .

[13]  Tobias Gehring,et al.  Ab initio quantum-enhanced optical phase estimation using real-time feedback control , 2015, Nature Photonics.

[14]  Howard Mark Wiseman,et al.  Optimal input states and feedback for interferometric phase estimation , 2001 .

[15]  J. Dowling Quantum optical metrology – the lowdown on high-N00N states , 2008, 0904.0163.

[16]  C. Caves Quantum Mechanical Noise in an Interferometer , 1981 .

[17]  H. M. Wiseman,et al.  How to perform the most accurate possible phase measurements , 2009, 0907.0014.

[18]  G. Milburn,et al.  Quantum Measurement and Control , 2009 .

[19]  M. Dutt,et al.  High-dynamic-range magnetometry with a single electronic spin in diamond. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[20]  Wiseman,et al.  Optimal states and almost optimal adaptive measurements for quantum interferometry , 2000, Physical review letters.

[21]  Milburn,et al.  Optimal quantum measurements for phase estimation. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[22]  D. Berry,et al.  Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation , 2007, Nature.

[23]  J Wrachtrup,et al.  High-dynamic-range magnetometry with a single nuclear spin in diamond. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[24]  D. Berry,et al.  Adaptive Measurements in the Optical Quantum Information Laboratory , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.