Perceived Sociability of Use and Individual Use of Social Networking Sites - A Field Study of Facebook Use in the Arctic

This paper investigates determinants of individual use of social network sites (SNSs). It introduces a new construct, Perceived Sociability of Use (PSOU), to explain the use of such computer mediated communication applications. Based on a field study of 113 Facebook users it shows that PSOU in the sense of maintaining social contacts is a significant predictor of Perceived Benefits (PB), Perceived Enjoyment (PE), attitude toward use and intention to use. Inspired by Benbasat and Barki, this paper also attempts to answer questions “what makes the system useful”, “what makes the system enjoyable to use” and “what makes the system sociable to use”. As a consequence it pays special focus on systems characteristics of IT applications as potential predictors of PSOU, PB and PE, introducing seven such designable qualities (user-to-user interactivity, user identifiability, system quality, information quality, usability, user-to-system interactivity, and aesthetics). The results indicate that especially satisfaction with user-to-user interactivity is a significant determinant of PSOU, and that satisfactions with six of these seven designable qualities have significant paths in the proposed nomological network. TYPE OF PAPER AND

[1]  A. Maslow Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[2]  Henryk Sienkiewicz,et al.  Quo Vadis? , 1967, American Association of Industrial Nurses journal.

[3]  C. Alderfer Existence, Relatedness, and Growth; Human Needs in Organizational Settings , 1972 .

[4]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[5]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[6]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[7]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[8]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[9]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[10]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[11]  W. Buxton Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[12]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  K. Miller,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[14]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[15]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[16]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[17]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[19]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[21]  C. Gunawardena Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences , 1995 .

[22]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[25]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Work, Friendship, and Media Use for Information Exchange in a Networked Organization , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[26]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  WellmanBarry,et al.  Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization , 1998 .

[28]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[29]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[30]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  System Life Expectancy and the Maintenance Effort: Exploring Their Equilibration , 2000, MIS Q..

[31]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[32]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[34]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[35]  R. Spears,et al.  Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonymity Effects on Social Identity Processes within Groups , 2001 .

[36]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[37]  W. Galston Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community , 2001 .

[38]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation in Information Systems Research: A State-of-the-Art Assessment , 2001, MIS Q..

[39]  Sally J. McMillan Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, and Systems , 2002 .

[40]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[41]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[42]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[43]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  An empirical study of the effects of interactivity on web user attitude , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[44]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[46]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  The experienced "sense" of a virtual community: characteristics and processes , 2004, DATB.

[47]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[48]  Kwan Min Lee,et al.  Why Presence Occurs: Evolutionary Psychology, Media Equation, and Presence , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[49]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[50]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Understanding Individual Adoption of Instant Messaging: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[53]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community , 2005, TCHI.

[54]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction: Developing Effective Organizational Information Systems , 2006 .

[55]  Grace J. Johnson,et al.  Interactivity and its Facets Revisited: Theory and Empirical Test , 2006 .

[56]  Carol Saunders,et al.  PLS: A Silver Bullet? , 2006 .

[57]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[58]  Heshan Sun,et al.  The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[59]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[60]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[61]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach , 2006 .

[62]  Keenan A. Pituch,et al.  The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[63]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[64]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[65]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The impact of Web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[66]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[67]  Gordon R. Foxall,et al.  Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1 , 2007 .

[68]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[69]  Stephen A. Rains The Impact of Anonymity on Perceptions of Source Credibility and Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Communication: A Test of Two Competing Hypotheses , 2007, Commun. Res..

[70]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[71]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective , 2007, MIS Q..

[72]  Gi Woong Yun Interactivity Concepts Examined: Response Time, Hypertext, Role Taking, and Multimodality , 2007 .

[73]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[74]  Hsin Hsin Chang,et al.  An investigation of user communication behavior in computer mediated environments , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[75]  Marylène Gagné,et al.  Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[76]  Heather D. Pfeiffer,et al.  Handbook of Research on Social Interaction Technologies and Collaboration Software: Concepts and Trends , 2008 .

[77]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Cyworld User Behavior: Implication of the Web2.0 User Acceptance , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[78]  Craig Ross,et al.  Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[79]  S. G. Mazman,et al.  The Usage of Social Networks in Educational Context , 2009 .

[80]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[81]  Elsevier Sdol International Journal of Human-Computer Studies , 2009 .

[82]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  Exploring continued online service usage behavior: The roles of self-image congruity and regret , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[83]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Usability and Sociability in Online Communities: A Comparative Study of Knowledge Seeking and Contribution , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[84]  Gaylen N. Chandler,et al.  Firm and industry effects on firm performance: A generalization and extension for new ventures , 2009 .

[85]  Øystein Sørebø,et al.  The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers' motivation to continue to use e-learning technology , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[86]  W. Reinartz,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance-Based and Variance-Based SEM , 2009 .

[87]  Bernhard Debatin,et al.  Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[88]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Examination of cognitive absorption influencing the intention to use a virtual community , 2009, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[89]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  Why People Use Social Networking Sites , 2009, HCI.

[90]  Ronald T. Cenfetelli,et al.  Interpretation of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research , 2009, MIS Q..

[91]  S. Rafaeli,et al.  Assessing interactivity in computer-mediated research , 2009 .

[92]  Robin Teigland,et al.  The provision of online public goods: Examining social structure in an electronic network of practice , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[93]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Extending technology usage models to interactive hedonic technologies: a theoretical model and empirical test , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[94]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Predicting adolescents' use of social networking sites from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[95]  Ohbyung Kwon,et al.  An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[96]  Teresa Correa,et al.  Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[97]  Varun Grover,et al.  Investigating Two Contradictory Views of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research , 2010, MIS Q..

[98]  N Bradley,et al.  A silver bullet , 2010 .

[99]  Tracii Ryan,et al.  Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[100]  A. Soares,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model in the Adoption of Social Ne tworks , 2011 .

[101]  Chia-Lin Hsu,et al.  Understanding Users' Continuance of Facebook: An Integrated Model with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, Expectation Disconfirmation Model, and Flow Theory , 2011, Int. J. Virtual Communities Soc. Netw..

[102]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[103]  Ya-Ping Chang,et al.  Understanding social networking sites adoption in China: A comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[104]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[105]  James C. McElroy,et al.  The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[106]  E. Deci,et al.  Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. , 2012 .

[107]  Ya-Ping Chang,et al.  The role of perceived social capital and flow experience in building users' continuance intention to social networking sites in China , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[108]  D. Straub,et al.  Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly , 2012 .

[109]  Lindsay T. Graham,et al.  A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[110]  Lakshmi Goel,et al.  The Social Component of Information Systems - How Sociability Contributes to Technology Acceptance , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[111]  Agata Blachnio,et al.  Psychological Determinants of Using Facebook: A Research Review , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[112]  Neda Abasi,et al.  Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable , 2015 .

[113]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .