Stream functions and equivalent freshwater heads for modeling regional flow of variable-density groundwater: 1. Review of theory and verification

Steady state flow of variable-density groundwater is simulated using equivalent freshwater heads and stream functions. On the basis of the work by De Josselin de Jong (1960,1969), fluids with different fluid densities are replaced by one hypothetical fluid, and singularities are introduced along interfaces where the actual fluids change densities. The basic flow equation describing variable-density flow, written in terms of equivalent freshwater head, is used to derive the corresponding stream function equation and associated boundary conditions. Neumann boundary conditions for the stream function equation can be determined from gradients of equivalent freshwater heads along the boundary. Stream functions provide a direct representation of the groundwater flow pattern and flow rates where fluid densities vary in space. In comparison, equivalent freshwater heads and fluid densities describe the two driving forces, hydraulic gradient and buoyancy force, but head gradients do not necessarily describe the flow direction of variable-density groundwater in isotropic media. Comparison of the finite element formulations indicates that potential errors in the centroid-consistent velocity calculation based on the stream function solution can be expected to be smaller than those in the velocity calculation based on the head solution for cross-sectional flow models, because discretization in the vertical direction is typically finer than in the horizontal direction.

[1]  Graham E. Fogg,et al.  Stream functions and equivalent freshwater heads for modeling regional flow of variable‐density groundwater: 2. Application and implications for modeling strategy , 1990 .

[2]  A. Herbert,et al.  Coupled groundwater flow and solute transport with fluid density strongly dependent upon concentration , 1988 .

[3]  W. R. Souza,et al.  Variable density flow and solute transport simulation of regional aquifers containing a narrow freshwater‐saltwater transition zone , 1987 .

[4]  Graham E. Fogg,et al.  Automatic Generation of Flow Nets with Conventional Ground-Water Modeling Algorithmsa , 1985 .

[5]  Emil O. Frind,et al.  The Dual Formulation of Flow for Contaminant Transport Modeling: 1. Review of Theory and Accuracy Aspects , 1985 .

[6]  C. Voss,et al.  SUTRA (Saturated-Unsaturated Transport). A Finite-Element Simulation Model for Saturated-Unsaturated, Fluid-Density-Dependent Ground-Water Flow with Energy Transport or Chemically-Reactive Single-Species Solute Transport. , 1984 .

[7]  E. Frind Seawater intrusion in continuous coastal aquifer-aquitard systems , 1982 .

[8]  E. Frind Simulation of long-term transient density-dependent transport in groundwater , 1982 .

[9]  R. W. Nelson,et al.  Evaluating the environmental consequences of groundwater contamination: 2. Obtaining location/arrival time and location/outflow quantity distributions for steady flow systems , 1978 .

[10]  W. G. Gray,et al.  A Galerkin‐finite element technique for calculating the transient position of the saltwater front , 1975 .

[11]  R. T. Cheng,et al.  On seawater encroachment in coastal aquifers , 1974 .

[12]  G. Pinder,et al.  Application of Galerkin's Procedure to aquifer analysis , 1972 .

[13]  G. Pinder,et al.  A Numerical Technique for Calculating the Transient Position of the Saltwater Front , 1970 .

[14]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Finite Element Method of Analyzing Steady Seepage with a Free Surface , 1970 .

[15]  G. de Josselin de Jong,et al.  Singularity distributions for the analysis of multiple-fluid flow through porous media , 1960 .

[16]  M. Hubbert,et al.  The Theory of Ground-Water Motion , 1940, The Journal of Geology.

[17]  G. Willms The Streamfunction Method a Direct Approach to Simulate Groundwater Flow , 1982 .

[18]  O. Zienkiewicz The Finite Element Method In Engineering Science , 1971 .