“FearNot!”: a computer-based anti-bullying-programme designed to foster peer intervention

Bullying is widespread in European schools, despite multiple intervention strategies having been proposed over the years. The present study investigates the effects of a novel virtual learning strategy (“FearNot!”) to tackle bullying in both UK and German samples. The approach is intended primarily for victims to increase their coping skills and further to heighten empathy and defence of victims by non-involved bystanders. This paper focuses on the defender role. Applying quantitative as well as qualitative methodology, the present study found that “FearNot!” helped non-involved children to become defenders in the German sub-sample while it had no such effect in the UK sub-sample. German “New Defenders” (children who are initially uninvolved but are nominated as defenders by their peers after the intervention period) were found to be significantly more popular at baseline, and to show more cognitive empathy (Theory of Mind) for the virtual victims as compared to permanently non-involved pupils. Moreover, gender interacts with becoming a defender in its effects on affective empathy, with emotional contagion being particularly associated with New Defender status among girls. The findings are discussed in relation to previous research on anti-bullying intervention strategies and cultural differences in bullying prevalence rates and intervention outcomes.

[1]  J. Dewey.  How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[2]  B. Latané,et al.  Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  R. Hogan,et al.  Development of an empathy scale. , 1969, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[4]  M. Hoffman,et al.  Empathy, its development and prosocial implications. , 1977, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[5]  J. Peery.  Popular, amiable, isolated, rejected: A reconceptualization of sociometric status in preschool children. , 1979 .

[6]  K. Dodge,et al.  Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. , 1982 .

[7]  McAlister Al.  Social-psychological approaches. , 1983 .

[8]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Self-concept changes in shy, Socially isolated adolescents following social skills training emphasising role plays , 1990 .

[9]  P. Salovey,et al.  Emotional Intelligence , 1990, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[10]  K Rigby,et al.  Bullying among Australian school children: reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. , 1991, The Journal of social psychology.

[11]  Steven R. Asher,et al.  Peer rejection in childhood. , 1991 .

[12]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  A Survey of the Nature and Extent of Bullying in Junior/Middle and Secondary Schools. , 1993 .

[13]  Mark H. Davis.  Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach , 1994 .

[14]  K. Lagerspetz,et al.  Sex Differences in Covert Aggression Among Adults , 1994 .

[15]  N. Hatton,et al.  Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation , 1995 .

[16]  N. Crick,et al.  Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. , 1995, Child development.

[17]  Alice Charach,et al.  Bullying at School: A Canadian Perspective. , 1995 .

[18]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Translating Tests: Some Practical Guidelines , 1996 .

[19]  Rosalind W. Picard.  Affective Computing , 1997 .

[20]  D. Pepler,et al.  Observations of Bullying and Victimization in the School Yard , 1998 .

[21]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group , 1998 .

[22]  Christina Salmivalli,et al.  Stability and change of behavior in connection with bullying in schools: A two‐year follow‐up , 1998 .

[23]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach , 1999 .

[24]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Participant role approach to school bullying: implications for interventions. , 1999, Journal of adolescence.

[25]  D. Pepler,et al.  Peer involvement in bullying: insights and challenges for intervention. , 1999, Journal of adolescence.

[26]  M. Bullock,et al.  Development of intelligence and thinking , 1999 .

[27]  D. Pepler,et al.  Observations of Bullying in the Playground and in the Classroom , 2000 .

[28]  J B Carlin,et al.  Does bullying cause emotional problems? A prospective study of young teenagers , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  D. Pepler,et al.  Naturalistic Observations of Peer Interventions in Bullying , 2001 .

[30]  Sandra Graham,et al.  Peer harassment in school : the plight of the vulnerable and victimized , 2001 .

[31]  Sarah N. Woods,et al.  Bullying and victimization of primary school children in England and Germany: prevalence and school factors. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[32]  Zhang Ming-min.  Intelligent Virtual Environment , 2001 .

[33]  L. Jeffrey,et al.  Middle School Bullying as a Context for the Development of Passive Observers to the Victimization of Others , 2001 .

[34]  C. Salmivalli.  Group view on victimization: Empirical findings and their implications. , 2001 .

[35]  K. Kumpulainen,et al.  Peer Harassment in School: The Plight of the Vulnerable and Victimized , 2002 .

[36]  D. Espelage,et al.  Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. , 2003, Child development.

[37]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Animated Characters in Bullying Intervention , 2003, IVA.

[38]  Sarah N. Woods,et al.  Does the Content of Anti-Bullying Policies Inform us About the Prevalence of Direct and Relational Bullying Behaviour in Primary Schools? , 2003 .

[39]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  England: the Sheffield project , 2004 .

[40]  P. Rodkin,et al.  Peer Ecologies of Aggression and Bullying , 2004 .

[41]  J. Flavell.  Theory-of-Mind Development: Retrospect and Prospect , 2004 .

[42]  Ludwig Mürbeth.  Scheithauer, H.; Hayer, T.; Petermann, F. (2003): Bullying unter Schülern. Erscheinungsformen, Risikobedingungen und Interventionskonzepte. Göttingen: Hogrefe (229 Seiten; € 29,95) [Rezension] , 2004 .

[43]  Sarah N. Woods,et al.  Direct and relational bullying among primary school children and academic achievement , 2004 .

[44]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be? , 2004 .

[45]  Bullying als Gruppenphänomen , 2004 .

[46]  D. Olweus,et al.  The Olweus Bullying Prevention Programme: design and implementation issues and a new national initiative in Norway. , 2004 .

[47]  F. Petermann†,et al.  Erhebung von Bullying im Kindergarten- und Grundschulalter: Ein Review , 2004 .

[48]  W. Schneider,et al.  Pathsways to school achievement in very preterm and full term children , 2004 .

[49]  Gitanjali Saluja,et al.  Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment. , 2004, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[50]  Karin S. Frey,et al.  Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: an experimental trial of the steps to respect program. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[51]  M. Boulton,et al.  Victim and peer group responses to different forms of aggression among primary school children , 2005 .

[52]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Politeness in Tactics for Pedagogical Agents , 2005, AIED.

[53]  Ana Paiva,et al.  FearNot! - An Experiment in Emergent Narrative , 2005, IVA.

[54]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Achieving Empathic Engagement Through Affective Interaction with Synthetic Characters , 2005, ACII.

[55]  Ana Paiva,et al.  LEARNING BY FEELING: EVOKING EMPATHY WITH SYNTHETIC CHARACTERS , 2005, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[56]  H. Scheithauer,et al.  Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: Age trends, gender differences, and correlates , 2006 .

[57]  Peter Wright,et al.  Drama Education and Development of Self: Myth or Reality? , 2006 .

[58]  Avshalom Caspi,et al.  Bullying Victimization Uniquely Contributes to Adjustment Problems in Young Children: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study , 2006, Pediatrics.

[59]  B. Robins,et al.  Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot , 2006 .

[60]  Ton Vogels,et al.  Do Bullied Children Get Ill, or Do Ill Children Get Bullied? A Prospective Cohort Study on the Relationship Between Bullying and Health-Related Symptoms , 2006, Pediatrics.

[61]  K. Berger,et al.  Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? , 2007 .

[62]  Wolfgang Schneider,et al.  Relations of Television Viewing and Reading: Findings From a 4-Year Longitudinal Study , 2007 .

[63]  Lynne Hall,et al.  FearNot! An Anti-Bullying Intervention: Evaluation of an Interactive Virtual Learning Environment , 2007 .

[64]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Implications of gender differences for the development of animated characters for the study of bullying behavior , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[65]  Rocci Luppicini,et al.  Handbook of Conversation Design for Instructional Applications , 2008 .

[66]  Rui Prada,et al.  Teaming up humans with autonomous synthetic characters , 2008, AI Commun..

[67]  Ana Paiva,et al.  e-Motional Learning in Primary Schools: FearNot! An Anti-Bullying Intervention Based on Virtual Role-Play with Intelligent Synthetic Characters. , 2008 .

[68]  Maria Sapouna.  Bullying in Greek Primary and Secondary Schools , 2008 .

[69]  N. Marlow,et al.  Specific language difficulties and school achievement in children born at 25 weeks of gestation or less. , 2008, The Journal of pediatrics.

[70]  W. Schneider.  The Development of Metacognitive Knowledge in Children and Adolescents: Major Trends and Implications for Education , 2008 .

[71]  Scott Watson,et al.  Towards Learning 'Self' and Emotional Knowledge in Social and Cultural Human-Agent Interactions , 2009, Int. J. Agent Technol. Syst..

[72]  John Bragin.  Handbook of Research on Agent-Based Societies: Social and Cultural Interactions by Goran Trajkovski and Samuel G. Collins (Eds.) , 2009, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[73]  Ana Paiva,et al.  But that was in another country: agents and intercultural empathy , 2009, AAMAS.

[74]  G. Lewis,et al.  Prospective study of peer victimization in childhood and psychotic symptoms in a nonclinical population at age 12 years. , 2009, Archives of general psychiatry.

[75]  Ruth Aylett,et al.  AN EMERGENT EMOTION MODEL FOR AN AFFECTIVE MOBILE GUIDE WITH ATTITUDE , 2009, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[76]  Sarah N. Woods,et al.  Who escapes or remains a victim of bullying in primary school? , 2009, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[77]  Elisabeth André,et al.  Studying multi-user settings for pervasive games , 2009, Mobile HCI.

[78]  D. Wolke,et al.  Crying and Feeding Problems in Infancy and Cognitive Outcome in Preschool Children Born at Risk: A Prospective Population Study , 2009, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[79]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Developing Relationships Between Autonomous Agents: Promoting Pro-Social Behaviour Through Virtual Learning Environments Part I , 2009 .

[80]  Ana Paiva,et al.  ORIENT: The Intercultural Empathy Through Virtual Role-Play , 2010 .

[81]  Maria Sapouna.  Collective Efficacy in the School Context: Does It Help Explain Victimization and Bullying Among Greek Primary and Secondary School Students? , 2010, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[82]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Virtual learning intervention to reduce bullying victimization in primary school: a controlled trial. , 2010, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[83]  Neil Marlow,et al.  Psychiatric disorders in extremely preterm children: longitudinal finding at age 11 years in the EPICure study. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[84]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Inter-cultural differences in response to a computer-based anti-bullying intervention , 2010 .

[85]  Elisabeth André,et al.  Design and Evaluation of Embodied Conversational Agents for Educational and Advisory Software , 2011 .