Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Outpatient Treatment of COVID-19 ― United States, January–July 2022

In December 2021 and early 2022, four medications received emergency use authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration for outpatient treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in patients who are at high risk for progressing to severe disease; these included nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) and molnupiravir (Lagevrio) (both oral antivirals), expanded use of remdesivir (Veklury; an intraveneous antiviral), and bebtelovimab (a monoclonal antibody [mAb]).* Reports have documented disparities in mAb treatment by race and ethnicity (1) and in oral antiviral treatment by zip code-level social vulnerability (2); however, limited data are available on racial and ethnic disparities in oral antiviral treatment.† Using electronic health record (EHR) data from 692,570 COVID-19 patients aged ≥20 years who sought medical care during January-July 2022, treatment with Paxlovid, Lagevrio, Veklury, and mAbs was assessed by race and ethnicity, overall and among high-risk patient groups. During 2022, the percentage of COVID-19 patients seeking medical care who were treated with Paxlovid increased from 0.6% in January to 20.2% in April and 34.3% in July; the other three medications were used less frequently (0.7%-5.0% in July). During April-July 2022, when Paxlovid use was highest, compared with White patients, Black or African American (Black) patients were prescribed Paxlovid 35.8% less often, multiple or other race patients 24.9% less often, American Indian or Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (AIAN/NHOPI) patients 23.1% less often, and Asian patients 19.4% less often; Hispanic patients were prescribed Paxlovid 29.9% less often than non-Hispanic patients. Racial and ethnic disparities in Paxlovid treatment were generally somewhat higher among patients at high risk for severe COVID-19, including those aged ≥50 years and those who were immunocompromised. The expansion of programs focused on equitable awareness of and access to outpatient COVID-19 treatments, as well as COVID-19 vaccination, including updated bivalent booster doses, can help protect persons most at risk for severe illness and facilitate equitable health outcomes.

[1]  B. Jackson,et al.  Notes From the Field: Dispensing of Oral Antiviral Drugs for Treatment of COVID-19 by Zip Code–Level Social Vulnerability — United States, December 23, 2021–August 28, 2022 , 2022, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[2]  Greta M. Massetti,et al.  Summary of Guidance for Minimizing the Impact of COVID-19 on Individual Persons, Communities, and Health Care Systems — United States, August 2022 , 2022, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[3]  Brendan R. Jackson,et al.  Dispensing of Oral Antiviral Drugs for Treatment of COVID-19 by Zip Code-Level Social Vulnerability - United States, December 23, 2021-May 21, 2022. , 2022, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[4]  M. Ison,et al.  Disparities in COVID-19 Monoclonal Antibody Delivery: a Retrospective Cohort Study , 2022, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[5]  C. Ladva,et al.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Receipt of Medications for Treatment of COVID-19 — United States, March 2020–August 2021 , 2022, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[6]  M. Samore,et al.  Strategies to minimize inequity in COVID-19 vaccine access in the US: Implications for future vaccine rollouts , 2021, The Lancet Regional Health - Americas.

[7]  Brisa Urquieta de Hernandez,et al.  Development, Implementation, and Results from a COVID-19 Messaging Campaign to Promote Health Care Seeking Behaviors Among Community Clinic Patients , 2020, Journal of Community Health.

[8]  K. Ornstein,et al.  RESEARCHRacial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Access to Telehealth , 2020, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  Y. Paradies,et al.  Racial and cultural minority experiences and perceptions of health care provision in a mid-western region , 2018, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[10]  S. Hurst,et al.  Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review , 2017, BMC medical ethics.