Novel Arthropod Repellent, BioUD, Is an Efficacious Alternative to Deet

Abstract For >50 yr, N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet) has been the standard for arthropod repellents and has been an important tool to protect people from disease agents carried by ticks, mosquitoes, and other arthropods. However, some people avoid using deet because of concerns about adverse health effects. In 2007, a new repellent, BioUD, with the active ingredient 7.75% 2-undecanone, originally derived from wild tomato (Lycopersicon hirsutum Dunal f. glabratum C. H. Müll) plants, was registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the current study, repellent efficacy of BioUD was compared using arm-in-cage studies with 7 and 15% deet against the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti (L.) and Aedes albopictus Skuse. No differences were found in mean repellency over 6 h after application between BioUD versus 7 and 15% deet for Ae albopictus. For Ae. aegypti, no differences were found over the same time period for 7% deet. Compared with 15% deet, BioUD mean repellency was lower over the 6-h test period. Human subject field trials were conducted in North Carolina, United States, and Ontario, Canada, comparing the repellency of BioUD to products containing 25 and 30% deet. BioUD provided the same repellency or was more efficacious than 25 and 30% deet, respectively, in these studies. Laboratory trials were conducted to determine the repellent activity of BioUD against the American dog tick, Dermacentor variabilis (Say), on human skin and cloth. BioUD repelled ticks at least 2.5 h after application to human skin. On cloth, no differences in mean repellency were found through 8 d after application between BioUD and 7% deet. In a two-choice test for BioUD versus 15% deet on filter paper, ticks spent significantly more time on the deet-treated surface than the BioUD-treated surface. Based on these studies in toto, BioUD is an efficacious alternative to deet in its repellent activity.

[1]  S. Frances,et al.  User Acceptability: Public Perceptions of Insect Repellents , 2006 .

[2]  R. Novak,et al.  Considerations on the Use of Botanically-Derived Repellent Products , 2006 .

[3]  S. Frances Efficacy and Safety of Repellents Containing Deet , 2006 .

[4]  Glenn J. Leach,et al.  Repellents Used in Fabric: The Experience of the U.S. Military , 2006 .

[5]  Scott P Carroll,et al.  PMD, a Registered Botanical Mosquito Repellent with Deet-Like Efficacy , 2006, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[6]  M. Isman Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. , 2006, Annual review of entomology.

[7]  N. Komalamisra,et al.  Comparative repellency of 38 essential oils against mosquito bites , 2005, Phytotherapy research : PTR.

[8]  M. Fyfe,et al.  Protective Behavior Survey, West Nile Virus, British Columbia , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[9]  D. Strickman,et al.  The genus and subgenus categories within Culicidae and placement of Ochlerotatus as a subgenus of Aedes. , 2004, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[10]  M. Fyfe,et al.  West Nile Virus in British Columbia , 2004 .

[11]  M. Bradshaw,et al.  PATH Across the Generations: Older Adults’ Perceptions on the Value of Intergenerational Contact , 2003, Care Management Journals.

[12]  G. Kennedy Tomato, pests, parasitoids, and predators: tritrophic interactions involving the genus Lycopersicon. , 2003, Annual review of entomology.

[13]  E. Walker,et al.  Role of Bacteria in Mediating the Oviposition Responses of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) , 2003, Journal of medical entomology.

[14]  N. Becker,et al.  Mosquitoes and Their Control , 2003, Springer US.

[15]  G. Koren,et al.  DEET-based insect repellents: safety implications for children and pregnant and lactating women. , 2003, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[16]  D. Sudakin,et al.  DEET: A Review and Update of Safety and Risk in the General Population , 2003, Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology.

[17]  J. Herrington Pre-West Nile virus outbreak: perceptions and practices to prevent mosquito bites and viral encephalitis in the United States. , 2003, Vector borne and zoonotic diseases.

[18]  J. F. Day,et al.  Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  ohn,et al.  COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF INSECT REPELLENTS AGAINST MOSQUITO BITES , 2002 .

[20]  J. F. Reinert,et al.  New classification for the composite genus Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae: Aedini), elevation of subgenus Ochlerotatus to generic rank, reclassification of the other subgenera, and notes on certain subgenera and species. , 2000, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[21]  D. Barnard Repellency of essential oils to mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). , 1999, Journal of medical entomology.

[22]  Osimitz Tg,et al.  The present safety assessment of deet. , 1995 .

[23]  G. Kennedy,et al.  2‐Undecanone, a constituent of the glandular trichomes of Lycopersicon hirsutum f. glabratum: Effects on Heliothis zea and Manduca sexta growth and survival , 1987 .

[24]  R. A. Ellis,et al.  The Insects and Arachnids of Canada Part 6: The Mosquitoes of Canada - Diptera: Culicidae , 1979 .