Eusociality and Cooperation

The evolution of eusociality, here defined as the emergence of societies with reproductive division of labour and cooperative brood care, was first seen as a challenge to Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. Why should individuals permanently forgo direct reproduction to help other individuals to reproduce? Kin selection, the indirect transmission of genes through relatives, is the key process explaining the evolution of permanently nonreproductive helpers. However, in some taxa helpers delay reproduction until a breeding opportunity becomes available. Overall, eusociality evolved when ecological conditions promote stable associations of related individuals that benefit from jointly exploiting and defending common resources. High levels of cooperation and robust mechanisms of division of labour are found in many animal societies. However, conflicts among individuals are still frequent when group members that are not genetically identical compete over reproduction or resource allocation.

[1]  J. Boomsma.  Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  R. Johnstone.  Models of reproductive skew: A review and synthesis (Invited Article) , 2000 .

[3]  L. Keller,et al.  Sham nepotism as a result of intrinsic differences in brood viability in ants , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  L. Keller,et al.  The role of queen pheromones in social insects: queen control or queen signal? , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  J. Komdeur,et al.  Importance of habitat saturation and territory quality for evolution of cooperative breeding in the Seychelles warbler , 1992, Nature.

[6]  L. Keller,et al.  Genetic Compatibility Affects Queen and Worker Caste Determination , 2008, Science.

[7]  Keller,et al.  Alternative reproductive strategies: a queen perspective in ants. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Stephen T. Emlen,et al.  Cooperative breeding in birds and mammals. , 1984 .

[9]  F. Weissing,et al.  Towards a unified theory of cooperative breeding: the role of ecology and life history re-examined , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  L. Sundström,et al.  Sociobiology: Worker nepotism among polygynous ants , 2003, Nature.

[11]  J. Field,et al.  Nest Inheritance Is the Missing Source of Direct Fitness in a Primitively Eusocial Insect , 2011, Science.

[12]  J. Boomsma,et al.  Blending of heritable recognition cues among ant nestmates creates distinct colony gestalt odours but prevents within‐colony nepotism , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[13]  Michel Chapuisat,et al.  Cooperation among Selfish Individuals in Insect Societies , 1999 .

[14]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Kin conflict over caste determination in social Hymenoptera , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  Madeleine Beekman,et al.  Ancestral Monogamy Shows Kin Selection Is Key to the Evolution of Eusociality , 2008, Science.

[16]  L. Keller,et al.  Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  The major evolutionary transitions , 1995, Nature.

[18]  S. Graham,et al.  Honey Bee Nest Thermoregulation: Diversity Promotes Stability , 2004, Science.

[19]  P. Johns,et al.  Nonrelatives inherit colony resources in a primitive termite , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  L. Keller,et al.  Indiscriminate altruism: unduly nice parents and siblings. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  Bourke.  Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects , 1999 .

[22]  I. Owens,et al.  Cooperative breeding in birds: the role of ecology , 1999 .

[23]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[24]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Tragedy of the commons in Melipona bees , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Laurent Keller,et al.  Maternal Effect on Female Caste Determination in a Social Insect , 2008, Current Biology.

[26]  L. Keller,et al.  Testing kin selection with sex allocation data in eusocial Hymenoptera , 1999, Heredity.

[27]  N. Franks,et al.  Social Evolution in Ants , 2019 .

[28]  Stefano Turillazzi,et al.  Unrelated helpers in a social insect , 2000, Nature.

[29]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  L. Keller,et al.  Partitioning of Reproduction in Mother-Daughter Versus Sibling Associations: A Test of Optimal Skew Theory , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[31]  J. Strassmann,et al.  KIN SELECTION AND SOCIAL INSECTS , 1998 .

[32]  M. Chapuisat,et al.  Sex Allocation Conflict in Ants: When the Queen Rules , 2006, Current Biology.

[33]  L. Keller,et al.  Conditional Manipulation of Sex Ratios by Ant Workers: A Test of Kin Selection Theory , 1996, Science.

[34]  K. Foster,et al.  Conflict resolution in insect societies. , 2006, Annual review of entomology.

[35]  T. Seeley.  The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies , 1995 .

[36]  A. Bourke,et al.  The Ecology of Communal Breeding: The Case of Multiple-Queen Leptothoracine Ants , 1994 .

[37]  Laurent Keller,et al.  Increased soldier production in ant colonies exposed to intraspecific competition , 1996, Nature.

[38]  Bernard J. Crespi,et al.  The definition of eusociality , 1995 .

[39]  D. Queller.  The evolution of eusociality: Reproductive head starts of workers. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  L. Keller,et al.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Self-Organized Division of Labor in Social Insects , 2011 .

[42]  T. Wenseleers,et al.  Enforced altruism in insect societies , 2006, Nature.

[43]  L. Keller,et al.  Tug-of-war over reproduction in a social bee , 2004, Nature.

[44]  R. Gadagkar.  Evolution of eusociality: the advantage of assured fitness returns , 1990 .

[45]  Francis L. W. Ratnieks,et al.  Worker policing in the honeybee , 1989, Nature.

[46]  Tom Wenseleers,et al.  Altruism in insect societies and beyond: voluntary or enforced? , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[47]  Caste and ecology in the social insects , 1979 .

[48]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Sex-biased dispersal, haplodiploidy and the evolution of helping in social insects , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Nigel R Franks,et al.  Flexible task allocation and the organization of work in ants , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  L. Keller,et al.  Tests of reproductive-skew models in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[51]  L. Keller,et al.  Queen Control of Sex Ratio in Fire Ants , 2001, Science.

[52]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[53]  G. Robinson,et al.  Genetic and genomic analyses of the division of labour in insect societies , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[54]  B. Crespi,et al.  Three conditions for the evolution of eusociality: Are they sufficient? , 1994, Insectes Sociaux.

[55]  Laurent Keller,et al.  Forum The eusociality continuum , 1995 .

[56]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Inspiration for optimization from social insect behaviour , 2000, Nature.

[57]  R. Crozier,et al.  Genetic Intrigues. (Book Reviews: Evolution of Social Insect Colonies. Sex Allocation and Kin Selection.) , 1997 .

[58]  L. Keller,et al.  Effects of Brood Manipulation Costs on Optimal Sex Allocation in Social Hymenoptera , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[59]  K. Foster,et al.  Kin selection is the key to altruism. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.