How well do you see what you hear? The acuity of visual-to-auditory sensory substitution

Sensory substitution devices (SSDs) aim to compensate for the loss of a sensory modality, typically vision, by converting information from the lost modality into stimuli in a remaining modality. “The vOICe” is a visual-to-auditory SSD which encodes images taken by a camera worn by the user into “soundscapes” such that experienced users can extract information about their surroundings. Here we investigated how much detail was resolvable during the early induction stages by testing the acuity of blindfolded sighted, naïve vOICe users. Initial performance was well above chance. Participants who took the test twice as a form of minimal training showed a marked improvement on the second test. Acuity was slightly but not significantly impaired when participants wore a camera and judged letter orientations “live”. A positive correlation was found between participants' musical training and their acuity. The relationship between auditory expertise via musical training and the lack of a relationship with visual imagery, suggests that early use of a SSD draws primarily on the mechanisms of the sensory modality being used rather than the one being substituted. If vision is lost, audition represents the sensory channel of highest bandwidth of those remaining. The level of acuity found here, and the fact it was achieved with very little experience in sensory substitution by naïve users is promising.

[1]  C. Lam,et al.  Musician Enhancement for Speech-In-Noise , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[2]  M. Proulx,et al.  Visual experience facilitates allocentric spatial representation , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[4]  Kenneth J. Kokjer,et al.  The Information Capacity of the Human Fingertip , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  Malika Auvray,et al.  The Vibe: a versatile vision-to-audition sensory substitution device , 2010 .

[6]  Sara Shute,et al.  Molyneux's question. Vision, touch, and the philosophy of perception , 1979, Medical History.

[7]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  An experimental system for auditory image representations , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  M. Wanet-Defalque,et al.  Auditory coding of visual patterns for the blind. , 1999, Perception.

[10]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  The metamodal organization of the brain. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[11]  P. Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Sensory substitution and the human–machine interface , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  L. Merabet,et al.  What blindness can tell us about seeing again: merging neuroplasticity and neuroprostheses , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Ron Kupers,et al.  Tactile–‘visual’ acuity of the tongue in early blind individuals , 2007, Neuroreport.

[14]  Jamie Ward,et al.  Seeing with Sound? Exploring Different Characteristics of a Visual-to-Auditory Sensory Substitution Device , 2011, Perception.

[15]  K. O’regan,et al.  There is something out there: distal attribution in sensory substitution, twenty years later. , 2005, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[16]  D. F. Marks,et al.  Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[17]  S. Duke-Elder,et al.  Ophthalmic optics and refraction , 1970 .

[18]  Paul Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Brain plasticity: ‘visual’ acuity of blind persons via the tongue , 2001, Brain Research.

[19]  T. H. Allegri The Code of Federal Regulations , 1986 .

[20]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  Visual experiences in the blind induced by an auditory sensory substitution device , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[21]  C. Moore,et al.  Distinguishing between the precision of attentional localization and attentional resolution , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[23]  C. Trullemans,et al.  A real-time experimental prototype for enhancement of vision rehabilitation using auditory substitution , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Michael J. Proulx,et al.  The role of visual experience for the neural basis of spatial cognition , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[25]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[26]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  Functional recruitment of visual cortex for sound encoded object identification in the blind , 2009, Neuroreport.

[28]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Superior pre-attentive auditory processing in musicians. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[29]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[30]  J. Cronly-Dillon,et al.  The perception of visual images encoded in musical form: a study in cross-modality information transfer , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[32]  Michael J. Proulx,et al.  Synthetic synaesthesia and sensory substitution , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[33]  P. Montague,et al.  Vividness of mental imagery: Individual variability can be measured objectively , 2007, Vision Research.

[34]  David Brang,et al.  The cross-activation theory at 10. , 2011, Journal of neuropsychology.

[35]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  Multisensory perceptual learning and sensory substitution , 2014, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[36]  K. C. Persaud,et al.  Blind subjects construct conscious mental images of visual scenes encoded in musical form , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  BENJAMIN WHITE,et al.  Vision Substitution by Tactile Image Projection , 1969, Nature.

[38]  L. Merabet,et al.  Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  Michael J. Morgan,et al.  Molyneux's Question: Vision, Touch and the Philosophy of Perception. , 1979 .

[40]  Amir Amedi,et al.  ‘Visual’ Acuity of the Congenitally Blind Using Visual-to-Auditory Sensory Substitution , 2012, PloS one.

[41]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Learning to Perceive with a Visuo — Auditory Substitution System: Localisation and Object Recognition with ‘The Voice’ , 2007, Perception.

[42]  P. Stoerig,et al.  Seeing ‘Where’ through the Ears: Effects of Learning-by-Doing and Long-Term Sensory Deprivation on Localization Based on Image-to-Sound Substitution , 2008, PloS one.

[43]  H JACOBSON,et al.  The informational capacity of the human ear. , 1950, Science.

[44]  P. Stoerig,et al.  Seeing sounds and tingling tongues: Qualia in synaesthesia and sensory substitution , 2006 .

[45]  H JACOBSON,et al.  The informational capacity of the human eye. , 1950, Science.