A Semiotic Approach to Data Quality

Since the introduction of the ER-language in the late seventies, data modeling has been an important aspect of information systems development. The quality of data models has been investigated since the mid-nineties. In another strand of research, data and information quality has been investigated even longer. Data can also be looked upon as a type of model (on the instance level), as illustrated e.g. in the product models in CAD-systems. In this paper we present a specialization of a general framework for assessing quality of models to be able to evaluate the combined quality of data models and data. A practical application of the framework from assessing the potential quality of different data sources to be used in a collaborative work environment is used for illustrating the usefulness of the framework. We find on the one hand that the traditional properties of data quality and data model quality is subsumed by the generic SEQUAL-framework, and that there are aspects in this framework that are not covered by the existing work on data and data model quality. On the other hand, the comparison has resulted in a useful deepening of the generic framework for data quality, and has in this way improved the practical applicability of the SEQUAL-framework when applied to discussing and assessing data quality.

[1]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[2]  Jacques Bertin,et al.  Semiology of Graphics - Diagrams, Networks, Maps , 2010 .

[3]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[4]  John Krogstie,et al.  Quality of Business Process Models , 2012, PoEM.

[5]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Metrics for Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models , 1998, ER.

[6]  Ramez Elmasri,et al.  Entity-Relationship Approach — ER '93 , 1993, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  John Krogstie,et al.  Assessing Enterprise Modeling Languages Using a Generic Quality Framework , 2005, Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies.

[8]  Knut Aasland,et al.  An analysis of the uses and properties of the Obeya , 2012, 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation.

[9]  Jan Recker,et al.  Ontology- Versus Pattern-Based Evaluation of Process Modeling Languages: A Comparison , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  R. Carnap,et al.  INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF UNIFIED SCIENCE. , 1939, Science.

[11]  Charles F. Hockett,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[12]  Carlo Batini,et al.  Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques , 2006, Data-Centric Systems and Applications.

[13]  John Krogstie,et al.  Active knowledge modeling of enterprises , 2008 .

[14]  John Krogstie,et al.  Integrated Goal, Data and Process Modeling: From TEMPORA to Model-Generated Work-Places , 2008 .

[15]  John Krogstie,et al.  Quality of Conceptual Data Models , 2013 .

[16]  John Krogstie Model-Based Development and Evolution of Information Systems: A Quality Approach , 2012 .

[17]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  A semiotic information quality framework: development and comparative analysis , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[18]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  What Makes a Good Data Model? Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models , 1994, ER.

[19]  John Krogstie,et al.  A Semiotic Approach to Quality in Requirements Specifications , 2001, Organizational Semiotics.

[20]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  Data Exchange of Parametric CAD Models Using ISO 10303-108 , 2007 .

[21]  Dennis Tsichritzis,et al.  The ANSI/X3/SPARC DBMS Framework Report of the Study Group on Dabatase Management Systems , 1978, Inf. Syst..

[22]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Improving the quality of data models: empirical validation of a quality management framework , 2003, Inf. Syst..

[23]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  The “Physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[24]  Graeme Shanks,et al.  A Semiotic Information Quality Framework , 2004 .

[25]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  Unified Modeling Language User Guide, The (2nd Edition) (Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series) , 2005 .

[26]  C. Morris Foundations of the theory of signs , 1938 .

[27]  Keng Siau,et al.  Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies , 2005, Advanced topics in database research.

[28]  Tok Wang Ling,et al.  Conceptual Modeling – ER ’98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[29]  John Krogstie,et al.  Evaluating UML using a generic quality framework , 2003 .

[30]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Communication , 1950 .

[31]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The Unified Modeling Language User Guide , 1998, J. Database Manag..

[32]  Mario Piattini,et al.  A conceptual modeling quality framework , 2011, Software Quality Journal.