Mechanical continuity and reversible chromosome disassembly within intact genomes removed from living cells

Chromatin is thought to be structurally discontinuous because it is packaged into morphologically distinct chromosomes that appear physically isolated from one another in metaphase preparations used for cytogenetic studies. However, analysis of chromosome positioning and movement suggest that different chromosomes often behave as if they were physically connected in interphase as well as mitosis. To address this paradox directly, we used a microsurgical technique to physically remove nucleoplasm or chromosomes from living cells under isotonic conditions. Using this approach, we found that pulling a single nucleolus or chromosome out from interphase or mitotic cells resulted in sequential removal of the remaining nucleoli and chromosomes, interconnected by a continuous elastic thread. Enzymatic treatments of interphase nucleoplasm and chromosome chains held under tension revealed that mechanical continuity within the chromatin was mediated by elements sensitive to DNase or micrococcal nuclease, but not RNases, formamide at high temperature, or proteases. In contrast, mechanical coupling between mitotic chromosomes and the surrounding cytoplasm appeared to be mediated by gelsolin‐sensitive microfilaments. Furthermore, when ion concentations were raised and lowered, both the chromosomes and the interconnecting strands underwent multiple rounds of decondensation and recondensation. As a result of these dynamic structural alterations, the mitotic chains also became sensitive to disruption by restriction enzymes. Ion‐induced chromosome decondensation could be blocked by treatment with DNA binding dyes, agents that reduce protein disulfide linkages within nuclear matrix, or an antibody directed against histones. Fully decondensed chromatin strands also could be induced to recondense into chromosomes with pre‐existing size, shape, number, and position by adding anti‐histone antibodies. Conversely, removal of histones by proteolysis or heparin treatment produced chromosome decondensation which could be reversed by addition of histone H1, but not histones H2b or H3. These data suggest that DNA, its associated protein scaffolds, and surrounding cytoskeletal networks function as a structurally‐unified system. Mechanical coupling within the nucleoplasm may coordinate dynamic alterations in chromatin structure, guide chromosome movement, and ensure fidelity of mitosis. J. Cell. Biochem. 65:114–130. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  R. Lurz,et al.  Stability and reversibility of higher ordered structure of interphase chromatin: continuity of deoxyribonucleic acid is not required for maintenance of folded structure. , 1980, Biochemistry.

[2]  Nicklas Rb Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis. , 1967 .

[3]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  A fixed site of DNA replication in eucaryotic cells , 1980, Cell.

[4]  B. Korf,et al.  Random arrangement of mitotic chromosomes in radial metaphases of the Indian muntjac. , 1977, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[5]  W. Gilbert,et al.  Formation of parallel four-stranded complexes by guanine-rich motifs in DNA and its implications for meiosis , 1988, Nature.

[6]  D E Ingber,et al.  Cellular tensegrity: exploring how mechanical changes in the cytoskeleton regulate cell growth, migration, and tissue pattern during morphogenesis. , 1994, International review of cytology.

[7]  B. Maro,et al.  Mechanism of polar body formation in the mouse oocyte: an interaction between the chromosomes, the cytoskeleton and the plasma membrane. , 1986, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[8]  R. Nagele,et al.  Precise Spatial Positioning of Chromosomes During Prometaphase: Evidence for Chromosomal Order , 1995, Science.

[9]  L. Manuelidis A view of interphase chromosomes , 1990, Science.

[10]  R. Nicklas Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis. , 1967, Chromosoma.

[11]  M. Garcia-Blanco,et al.  Nuclear spreads: I. Visualization of bipartite ribosomal RNA domains , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  D. Ingber,et al.  Altering the cellular mechanical force balance results in integrated changes in cell, cytoskeletal and nuclear shape. , 1992, Journal of cell science.

[13]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Dynamics of a fluorescent calmodulin analog in the mammalian mitotic spindle at metaphase. , 1988, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[14]  D. Mazia,et al.  Mitosis and the Physiology of Cell Division , 1961 .

[15]  C. Rieder,et al.  Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  A. E. Sippel,et al.  A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity , 1989, Nature.

[17]  J. Pickett-Heaps,et al.  Chromosome motion and the spindle matrix , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  W. R. Breg,et al.  NON-RANDOM DISTRIBUTION OF CHROMOSOMES IN METAPHASE FIGURES FROM CULTURED HUMAN LEUCOCYTES. II. THE PERIPHERAL LOCATION OF CHROMOSOMES 13, 17-18 AND 21. , 1963, Cytogenetics.

[19]  K. Pienta,et al.  Cell structure and DNA organization. , 1991, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[20]  Wendy A Bickmore,et al.  Visualizing the Spatial Relationships between Defined DNA Sequences and the Axial Region of Extracted Metaphase Chromosomes , 1996, Cell.

[21]  G. C. Hoskins Electron Microscopic Observations of Human Chromosomes isolated by Micrurgy , 1965, Nature.

[22]  S. Takayama Interchromosomal connectives in squash preparations of L cells. , 1975, Experimental cell research.

[23]  R. Lavery,et al.  DNA: An Extensible Molecule , 1996, Science.

[24]  D. E. Wolf,et al.  Feedback control of the metaphase-anaphase transition in sea urchin zygotes: role of maloriented chromosomes , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  M. Mancini,et al.  Dynamic continuity of nuclear and mitotic matrix proteins in the cell cycle , 1996, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[26]  C. C. Hardin,et al.  Telomeric DNA oligonucleotides form novel intramolecular structures containing guanine·guanine base pairs , 1987, Cell.

[27]  E. G. Diacumakos,et al.  Chromosome Displacement in and Extraction from Human Cells at Different Mitotic Stages , 1971, Nature.

[28]  A. Schmit,et al.  Characterization and dynamics of cytoplasmic F-actin in higher plant endosperm cells during interphase, mitosis, and cytokinesis , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  R. Berezney,et al.  Nuclear protein matrix: association with newly synthesized DNA. , 1975, Science.

[30]  W. Earnshaw,et al.  Topoisomerase II is a structural component of mitotic chromosome scaffolds , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  D E Ingber,et al.  Fibronectin controls capillary endothelial cell growth by modulating cell shape. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  S. Penman,et al.  Epithelial cytoskeletal framework and nuclear matrix-intermediate filament scaffold: three-dimensional organization and protein composition , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle , 1986, Cell.

[34]  A. Belmont,et al.  Visualization of G1 chromosomes: a folded, twisted, supercoiled chromonema model of interphase chromatid structure , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[35]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  J. R. Paulson,et al.  The structure of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes , 1977, Cell.

[37]  B. Korf,et al.  Absence of true interchromosomal connectives in microsurgically isolated chromosomes. , 1980, Experimental cell research.

[38]  T. Cech,et al.  Monovalent cation-induced structure of telomeric DNA: The G-quartet model , 1989, Cell.

[39]  E. J. Dupraw,et al.  THE ORGANIZATION OF NUCLEI AND CHROMOSOMES IN HONEYBEE EMBRYONIC CELLS. , 1965, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  C. E. Hildebrand,et al.  Action of heparin on mammalian nuclei. I. Differential extraction of histone H1 and cooperative removal of histones from chromatin. , 1977, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[41]  J. B. Rattner,et al.  The higher-order structure of chromatin: evidence for a helical ribbon arrangement , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[42]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Metaphase chromosome structure. Involvement of topoisomerase II. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  R. Nicklas,et al.  Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint , 1995, Nature.

[44]  C. Bustamante,et al.  Overstretching B-DNA: The Elastic Response of Individual Double-Stranded and Single-Stranded DNA Molecules , 1996, Science.

[45]  A. Forer,et al.  Coordinated movements between autosomal half-bivalents in crane-fly spermatocytes: evidence that 'stop' signals are sent between partner half-bivalents. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[46]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  A model for chromatin opening: stimulation of topoisomerase II and restriction enzyme cleavage of chromatin by distamycin. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[47]  G. Krockmalnic,et al.  A normally masked nuclear matrix antigen that appears at mitosis on cytoskeleton filaments adjoining chromosomes, centrioles, and midbodies , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[48]  A Klug,et al.  Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin , 1979, The Journal of cell biology.

[49]  D. Jackson,et al.  Transcription occurs at a nucleoskeleton. , 1985, The EMBO journal.

[50]  G. de Murcia,et al.  Accessibility and structural role of histone domains in chromatin. biophysical and immunochemical studies of progressive digestion with immobilized proteases. , 1990, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[51]  P. Lintilhac,et al.  Stress-induced alignment of division plane in plant tissues grown in vitro , 1984, Nature.

[52]  A. Burdick Somatic cell chromosome interconnections in trypan preparations of Chinese hamster testicular cells. , 1976, Experimental cell research.

[53]  T. Kishimoto,et al.  Chromosome condensation in Xenopus mitotic extracts without histone H1. , 1993, Science.

[54]  D. Capco,et al.  The nuclear matrix: Three-dimensional architecture and protein composition , 1982, Cell.

[55]  W. R. Breg,et al.  NON-RANDOM DISTRIBUTION OF CHROMOSOMES IN METAPHASE FIGURES FROM CULTURED HUMAN LEUCOCYTES. I. THE PERIPHERAL LOCATION OF THE Y CHROMOSOME. , 1963, Cytogenetics.

[56]  C. E. Hildebrand,et al.  Action of heparin on mammalian nuclei. II. Cell-cycle-specific changes in chromatin organization correlate temporally with histone H1 phosphorylation. , 1978, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[57]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold , 1984, Cell.

[58]  S. Smith,et al.  Direct mechanical measurements of the elasticity of single DNA molecules by using magnetic beads. , 1992, Science.

[59]  G. C. Hoskins,et al.  Sensitivity of Micrurgically Removed Chromosomal Spindle Fibres to Enzyme Disruption , 1968, Nature.