Task-dependent influence of genetic architecture and mating frequency on division of labour in social insect societies

Division of labour is one of the most prominent features of social insects. The efficient allocation of individuals to different tasks requires dynamic adjustment in response to environmental perturbations. Theoretical models suggest that the colony-level flexibility in responding to external changes and internal perturbation may depend on the within-colony genetic diversity, which is affected by the number of breeding individuals. However, these models have not considered the genetic architecture underlying the propensity of workers to perform the various tasks. Here, we investigated how both within-colony genetic variability (stemming from variation in the number of matings by queens) and the number of genes influencing the stimulus (threshold) for a given task at which workers begin to perform that task jointly influence task allocation efficiency. We used a numerical agent-based model to investigate the situation where workers had to perform either a regulatory task or a foraging task. One hundred generations of artificial selection in populations consisting of 500 colonies revealed that an increased number of matings always improved colony performance, whatever the number of loci encoding the thresholds of the regulatory and foraging tasks. However, the beneficial effect of additional matings was particularly important when the genetic architecture of queens comprised one or a few genes for the foraging task’s threshold. By contrast, a higher number of genes encoding the foraging task reduced colony performance with the detrimental effect being stronger when queens had mated with several males. Finally, the number of genes encoding the threshold for the regulatory task only had a minor effect on colony performance. Overall, our numerical experiments support the importance of mating frequency on efficiency of division of labour and also reveal complex interactions between the number of matings and genetic architecture.

[1]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[2]  E. Wilson,et al.  Sociobiology. The New Synthesis , 1975 .

[3]  Sokal Rr,et al.  Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research 2nd edition. , 1981 .

[4]  P. Frumhoff,et al.  A genetic component to division of labour within honey bee colonies , 1988, Nature.

[5]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  B. Oldroyd,et al.  Intracolonial variance in honey bee foraging behaviour: the effects of sucrose concentration , 1991 .

[7]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Behavioral Flexibility and the Foraging Ecology of Seed-Eating Ants , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[8]  G. Robinson.  Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. , 1992, Annual review of entomology.

[9]  Benjamin P. Oldroyd,et al.  Genetic variance in honey bees for preferred foraging distance , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  L. Keller,et al.  GENETIC VARIABILITY, QUEEN NUMBER, AND POLYANDRY IN SOCIAL HYMENOPTERA , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  Stefan Fuchs,et al.  Lower performance in honeybee colonies of uniform paternity , 1994 .

[12]  T. Seeley.  The Wisdom of the Hive , 1995 .

[13]  M. Fondrk,et al.  Major quantitative trait loci affecting honey bee foraging behavior. , 1995, Genetics.

[14]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Paternity in eusocial Hymenoptera , 1996 .

[15]  S. O’Donnell,et al.  RAPD markers suggest genotypic effects on forager specialization in a eusocial wasp , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  J. Traniello,et al.  Behavioral Plasticity in Division of Labor in the Lower Termite Reticulitermes fukienensis , 1997, Naturwissenschaften.

[18]  Sandra D. Mitchell,et al.  Self-organization and the evolution of division of labor , 1998 .

[19]  D. Wilson,et al.  Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  S. Cahan,et al.  Undertaking specialization in the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Susan M. Bertram,et al.  Division of labor in a dynamic environment: response by honeybees (Apis mellifera) to graded changes in colony pollen stores , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  S. O’Donnell,et al.  Genotypic Effects on Forager Behavior in the Neotropical Stingless Bee Partamona bilineata (Hymenoptera: Meliponidae) , 1999, Naturwissenschaften.

[23]  A. Lenoir,et al.  Individual flexibility and choice of foraging strategy in Polyrhachis laboriosa F. Smith (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) , 1999, Insectes Sociaux.

[24]  M. Fondrk,et al.  Genetic dissection of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) foraging behavior. , 2000, The Journal of heredity.

[25]  J. Strassmann.  The rarity of multiple mating by females in the social Hymenoptera , 2001, Insectes Sociaux.

[26]  K. Ross,et al.  Fitness effects of group merging in a social insect , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  J. Fewell,et al.  Colony response to graded resource changes: an analytical model of the influence of genotype, environment, and dominance. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[28]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Effects of Group Composition and Level of Selection in the Evolution of Cooperation in Artificial Ants , 2003, ECAL.

[29]  M. Myerscough,et al.  Simulation models of the role of genetic variability in social insect task allocation , 2004, Insectes Sociaux.

[30]  T. Pankiw,et al.  Pleiotropy, epistasis and new QTL: the genetic architecture of honey bee foraging behavior. , 2004, The Journal of heredity.

[31]  Istvan Karsai,et al.  Organization and Regulation of Nest Construction Behavior in Metapolybia Wasps , 2004, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[32]  T. Seeley.  Social foraging in honey bees: how nectar foragers assess their colony's nutritional status , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  E. Wilson.  The relation between caste ratios and division of labor in the ant genus Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  L. Keller,et al.  Experimental manipulation of colony genetic diversity had no effect on short-term task efficiency in the Argentine ant Linepithema humile , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  S. Graham,et al.  Honey Bee Nest Thermoregulation: Diversity Promotes Stability , 2004, Science.

[36]  T. Rinderer,et al.  Task specialization in a wild bee, Apis florea (Hymenoptera: Apidae), revealed by RFLP banding , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[37]  Michel Chapuisat,et al.  Division of labour and worker size polymorphism in ant colonies: the impact of social and genetic factors , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  The genetics of social behavior in a polygynous ant , 1992, Naturwissenschaften.

[39]  James F. A. Traniello,et al.  Behavioral flexibility in age castes of the antPheidole dentata , 1989, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[40]  S. Graham,et al.  Modelling the role of intracolonial genetic diversity on regulation of brood temperature in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies , 2006, Insectes Sociaux.

[41]  D. Laloi,et al.  Intra-colonial variation of the sting extension response in the honey bee Apis mellifera , 2006, Insectes Sociaux.

[42]  D. Floreano,et al.  Division of labour and colony efficiency in social insects: effects of interactions between genetic architecture, colony kin structure and rate of perturbations , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  B. Oldroyd,et al.  The role of genetic diversity in nest cooling in a wild honey bee, Apis florea , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[44]  S. Aron,et al.  Mating for convenience or genetic diversity? Mating patterns in the polygynous ant Plagiolepis pygmaea , 2007 .

[45]  Raphaël Jeanson,et al.  Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[46]  Thomas D Seeley,et al.  Genetic Diversity in Honey Bee Colonies Enhances Productivity and Fitness , 2007, Science.

[47]  X. Cerdá,et al.  Individual and collective foraging decisions: a field study of worker recruitment in the gypsy ant Aphaenogaster senilis , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[48]  S. Aron,et al.  Genetic diversity, worker size polymorphism and division of labour in the polyandrous ant Cataglyphis cursor , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  W. Hughes,et al.  Multiple paternity or multiple queens: two routes to greater intracolonial genetic diversity in the eusocial Hymenoptera , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.