A second generation cervico-vaginal lavage device shows similar performance as its preceding version with respect to DNA yield and HPV DNA results
暂无分享,去创建一个
J. Berkhof | W. Melchers | R. Bekkers | R. P. Bosgraaf | A. Hesselink | F. V. van Kemenade | V. Verhoef | M. Dijkstra
[1] C. Westhoff,et al. The acceptability of a self-lavaging device compared to pelvic examination for cervical cancer screening among low-income women. , 2012, Journal of women's health.
[2] Y. Qiao,et al. EUROGIN 2011 roadmap on prevention and treatment of HPV‐related disease , 2012, International journal of cancer.
[3] G. N. Boer,et al. Brush-based self-sampling in combination with GP5+/6+-PCR-based hrHPV testing: high concordance with physician-taken cervical scrapes for HPV genotyping and detection of high-grade CIN. , 2012, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.
[4] X. Yi,et al. Improved sensitivity of vaginal self‐collection and high‐risk human papillomavirus testing , 2012, International journal of cancer.
[5] J. Berkhof,et al. Experience with high‐risk human papillomavirus testing on vaginal brush‐based self‐samples of non‐attendees of the cervical screening program , 2012, International journal of cancer.
[6] E. Lazcano-Ponce,et al. Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH): a community-based randomised controlled trial , 2011, The Lancet.
[7] A. Anttila,et al. Self-sample HPV Tests As an Intervention for Nonattendees of Cervical Cancer Screening in Finland: a Randomized Trial , 2011, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
[8] E. Wilander,et al. Self-sampling and HPV testing or ordinary Pap-smear in women not regularly attending screening: a randomised study , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.
[9] A. Anttila,et al. Self‐sampling versus reminder letter: Effects on cervical cancer screening attendance and coverage in Finland , 2011, International journal of cancer.
[10] W. Melchers,et al. The potential role of self‐sampling for high‐risk human papillomavirus detection in cervical cancer screening , 2011, Reviews in medical virology.
[11] Veerle M.H. Coupé,et al. Combined Promoter Methylation Analysis of CADM1 and MAL: An Objective Triage Tool for High-Risk Human Papillomavirus DNA–Positive Women , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.
[12] J. Waller,et al. HPV self-sampling as an alternative strategy in non-attenders for cervical screening – a randomised controlled trial , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.
[13] G. Grazzini,et al. The effect of self-sampled HPV testing on participation to cervical cancer screening in Italy: a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN96071600) , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.
[14] Johannes Berkhof,et al. HPV testing on self collected cervicovaginal lavage specimens as screening method for women who do not attend cervical screening: cohort study , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[15] J. Cuzick,et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.
[16] Feng Chen,et al. A new HPV-DNA test for cervical-cancer screening in developing regions: a cross-sectional study of clinical accuracy in rural China. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.
[17] J. Berkhof,et al. Age-dependent prevalence of 14 high-risk HPV types in the Netherlands: implications for prophylactic vaccination and screening , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.
[18] D. Stewart,et al. Self-collected samples for testing of oncogenic human papillomavirus: a systematic review. , 2007, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.
[19] E. Franco,et al. Are self-collected samples comparable to physician-collected cervical specimens for human papillomavirus DNA testing? A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.
[20] J. Berkhof,et al. Human papillomavirus testing on self‐sampled cervicovaginal brushes: An effective alternative to protect nonresponders in cervical screening programs , 2007, International journal of cancer.
[21] J. Habbema,et al. Nonattendance is still the main limitation for the effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands , 2006, International journal of cancer.
[22] A. Castelo,et al. Primary screening for cervical cancer through self sampling , 2006, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[23] J. Berkhof,et al. High Concordance of Results of Testing for Human Papillomavirus in Cervicovaginal Samples Collected by Two Methods, with Comparison of a Novel Self-Sampling Device to a Conventional Endocervical Brush , 2006, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[24] J. Fitzgerald,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of self collected vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus compared to clinician collected human papillomavirus specimens: a meta-analysis , 2005, Sexually Transmitted Infections.
[25] J. Peto,et al. The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK , 2004, The Lancet.
[26] J. Cuzick,et al. Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.
[27] P. Snijders,et al. GP5+/6+ PCR followed by Reverse Line Blot Analysis Enables Rapid and High-Throughput Identification of Human Papillomavirus Genotypes , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[28] M Arbyn,et al. Overview of important cervical cancer screening process values in European Union (EU) countries, and tentative predictions of the corresponding effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. , 2000, European journal of cancer.
[29] K Sigurdsson,et al. The Icelandic and Nordic cervical screening programs, Trends in incidence and mortality rates through 1995 , 1999, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.
[30] P. Babb,et al. Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. , 1999, BMJ.
[31] J. Cuzick,et al. Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.
[32] E. Franco,et al. BMC Women's Health , 2004 .