E-learning initiatives in forensic interpretation: report on experiences from current projects and outlook.

[1]  Christina Widén,et al.  Comments on "The database search problem" with respect to a recent publication in Forensic Science International. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[2]  F Taroni,et al.  Bayesian networks for evaluating forensic DNA profiling evidence: a review and guide to literature. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[3]  P. Tillers.  Trial by Mathematics – Reconsidered , 2011 .

[4]  C. Aitken,et al.  Fundamentals of probability and statistical evidence in criminal proceedings , 2010 .

[5]  B. Brinkmann,et al.  Allgemeine Empfehlungen der Spurenkommission zur statistischen Bewertung von DNA-Datenbank-Treffern , 2010, Rechtsmedizin.

[6]  Sheila Willis,et al.  Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion Association of Forensic Science Providers. , 2010, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[7]  Law. Policy.  Executive Summary of the National Academies of Science Reports, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward , 2009 .

[8]  David H. Kaye,et al.  Rounding Up the Usual Suspects: A Logical and Legal Analysis of DNA Trawling Cases , 2008 .

[9]  Claude Roux,et al.  Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, by Colin G. G. Aitken and Franco Taroni 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, 2004. , 2006 .

[10]  Colin Aitken,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science , 2006 .

[11]  I. Evett.  Career story: Consultant Forensic Statistician , 2005 .

[12]  Franco Taroni,et al.  Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists , 2004 .

[13]  A P Dawid,et al.  Comment on Stockmarr's "Likelihood ratios for evaluating DNA evidence when the suspect is found through a database search". , 2001, Biometrics.

[14]  J A Lambert,et al.  The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements. , 2000, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[15]  G. Jackson,et al.  The scientist and the Scales of Justice , 2000 .

[16]  A Stockmarr,et al.  Likelihood Ratios for Evaluating DNA Evidence When the Suspect is Found Through a Database Search , 1999, Biometrics.

[17]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  Case pre-assessment and review in a two-way transfer case , 1999 .

[18]  I. Evett,et al.  A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework , 1998 .

[19]  J A Lambert,et al.  A model for case assessment and interpretation. , 1998, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[20]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  Expert evidence and forensic misconceptions of the nature of exact science , 1996 .

[21]  Bernard Robertson,et al.  Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom , 1995 .

[22]  I. Evett,et al.  More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions. , 2000, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[23]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Inference in Forensic Identification , 1995 .

[24]  Richard S. Frank,et al.  The Theory of Interpreting Scientific Transfer Evidence , 1990 .