Fish avoidance of research vessels and the efficacy of noise-reduced vessels: a review

Received 25 April 2012; accepted 18 August 2012. It has long been recognized that fish can avoid approaching vessels and that these behaviours can bias fishery surveys. Underwater noise is considered the primary stimulus, and standards for research vessel noise have been established to minimize fish reactions. We review the literature on fish reactions to vessels appearing since these recommendations were made, focusing on acoustic surveys, and compare how fish react to noise-reduced and conventional vessels. Reactions to approaching vessels are variable and difficult to predict. However, the behaviour can bias acoustic abundance measurements, and should be considered when performing acoustic surveys. The few comparisons of acoustic abundance measurements from noise-reduced and conventional vessels are contradictory, but demonstrate that the sound pressure level, on which the noise-reduction criterion is based, is insufficient to explain how fish react to survey vessels. Further research is needed to identify the stimuli fish perceive from approaching vessels and the factors affecting whether fish perceiving these stimuli will react before further recommendations to reduce vessel-avoidance reactions can be made. In the interim, measurement of the biases introduced by fish avoidance reactions during surveys, and timing of surveys when fish are in a less reactive state, may reduce errors introduced by vessel avoidance.

[1]  Hilmar Kristjonsson,et al.  Modern fishing gear of the world , 1959 .

[2]  D. Holliday,et al.  Doppler Structure in Echoes from Schools of Pelagic Fish , 1974 .

[3]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Principles of underwater sound , 1975 .

[4]  Donald Roe Ross,et al.  Mechanics of underwater noise , 1976 .

[5]  O. Nakken,et al.  Target strength measurements of fish , 1977 .

[6]  W. Foster,et al.  Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect: The trafalgar effect , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Acoustic distance discrimination by the cod , 1983, Nature.

[8]  Abby L. Schwarz,et al.  Responses of Pacific Herring, Clupea harengus pallasi, to Some Underwater Sounds , 1984 .

[9]  Kenneth G. Foote,et al.  Rather‐high‐frequency sound scattering by swimbladdered fish , 1985 .

[10]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[11]  C. Barnard,et al.  Parasitism and Host Behaviour , 1990 .

[12]  Kjell Olsen,et al.  Fish behaviour and acoustic sampling , 1990 .

[13]  M. Milinski Parasites and host decision-making , 1990 .

[14]  O. Godø,et al.  Fish reaction to trawling noise: The significance for trawl sampling , 1990 .

[15]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  Some elements on vertical avoidance of fish schools to a vessel during acoustic surveys , 1992 .

[16]  A. Bouskila,et al.  Rules of Thumb for Predation Hazard Assessment: Predictions from a Dynamic Model , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[17]  P. S. Enger,et al.  Awareness reactions and avoidance responses to sound in juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. , 1992 .

[18]  Ole Arve Misund,et al.  Swimming behaviour of fish schools in the North Sea during acoustic surveying and pelagic trawl sampling , 1992 .

[19]  O. A. Misund,et al.  Reactions of penned herring and cod to playback of original, frequency-filtered and time-smoothed vessel sound , 1995 .

[20]  R. Mitson Underwater noise of research vessels:Review and recommendations , 1995 .

[21]  Rudy J. Kloser,et al.  Avoidance of a camera system by a deepwater fish, the orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) , 1995 .

[22]  Ole Arve Misund,et al.  Adaptive behaviour of herring schools in the Norwegian Sea as revealed by high-resolution sonar , 1996 .

[23]  Jan Tore Øvredal,et al.  Reactions of herring schools to the sound field of a survey vessel , 1996 .

[24]  Egil Ona,et al.  Acoustic sampling and signal processing near the seabed: the deadzone revisited , 1996 .

[25]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  Analysis of vessel influence on spatial behaviour of fish schools using a multi-beam sonar and consequences for biomass estimates by echo-sounder , 1996 .

[26]  Impact of fish distribution and species composition on the relationship between acoustic and swept-area estimates of fish density , 1996 .

[27]  Daniel T. Blumstein,et al.  Assessment and decision making in animals: A mechanistic model underlying behavioral flexibility can prevent ambiguity , 1996 .

[28]  S. McClatchie,et al.  Spatial distribution of planktivorous fish schools in relation to krill abundance and local hydrography off Otago, New Zealand , 1998 .

[29]  S. L. Lima Stress and Decision Making under the Risk of Predation: Recent Developments from Behavioral, Reproductive, and Ecological Perspectives , 1998 .

[30]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  Dynamics of pelagic fish distribution and behaviour : effects on fisheries and stock assessment , 1999 .

[31]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Temporal Variation in Danger Drives Antipredator Behavior: The Predation Risk Allocation Hypothesis , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Arveson,et al.  Radiated noise characteristics of a modern cargo ship , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  P. Stevenson,et al.  Addendum: Fish do not avoid survey vessels , 2000, Nature.

[34]  David A. Demer,et al.  Measurements of three-dimensional fish school velocities with an acoustic Doppler current profiler , 2000 .

[35]  P. G. Fernandes,et al.  Oceanography: Fish do not avoid survey vessels , 2000, Nature.

[36]  H. E. Karlsen,et al.  Detection of Infrasound in Fish and Behavioral Responses to Intense Infrasound in Juvenile Salmonids and European Silver Eels: A Minireview , 2001 .

[37]  Ingvar Huse,et al.  The effect of vessel avoidance of wintering Norwegian spring spawning herring , 2002 .

[38]  Harald Gjøsæter,et al.  Assessment methodology for Barents Sea capelin, Mallotus villosus (Müller) , 2002 .

[39]  A. Frid,et al.  Synthesis Human-caused Disturbance Stimuli as a Form of Predation Risk , 2002 .

[40]  Vidar Hjellvik,et al.  An attempt at estimating the effective fishing height of the bottom trawl using acoustic survey recordings , 2003 .

[41]  R. Mitson,et al.  Causes and effects of underwater noise on fish abundance estimation , 2003 .

[42]  Paul G. Fernandes,et al.  An investigation of avoidance by Antarctic krill of RRS James Clark Ross using the Autosub-2 autonomous underwater vehicle , 2003 .

[43]  Dag Tjøstheim,et al.  Avoidance behaviour in cod (Gadus morhua) to a bottom-trawling vessel , 2003 .

[44]  E. Ona An expanded target-strength relationship for herring , 2003 .

[45]  H. E. Karlsen,et al.  Infrasound initiates directional fast-start escape responses in juvenile roach Rutilus rutilus , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[46]  Estimating uncertainty associated with acoustic surveys of spawning hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae) in Cook Strait, New Zealand , 2004 .

[47]  John K. Horne,et al.  Comparing the modelled and measured target-strength variability of walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma , 2004 .

[48]  N. Handegard,et al.  Possible vessel avoidance behaviour of capelin in a feeding area and on a spawning ground , 2004 .

[49]  François Gerlotto,et al.  Three-dimensional structure and avoidance behaviour of anchovy and common sardine schools in central southern Chile , 2004 .

[50]  L. Nøttestad,et al.  The behaviour of spawning herring in relation to a survey vessel , 2005 .

[51]  Dag Tjøstheim,et al.  When fish meet a trawling vessel : examining the behaviour of gadoids using a free-floating buoy and acoustic split-beam tracking , 2005 .

[52]  P. S. Enger,et al.  Reactions of cyprinids to infrasound in a lake and at the cooling water inlet of a nuclear power plant , 2006 .

[53]  Sophie Bertrand,et al.  Waves of agitation inside anchovy schools observed with multibeam sonar: a way to transmit information in response to predation , 2006 .

[54]  Georg Skaret,et al.  Pre-spawning herring in a protected area showed only moderate reaction to a surveying vessel , 2006 .

[55]  S. Kaartvedt,et al.  Fish are attracted to vessels , 2006 .

[56]  W.M. Carey,et al.  Sound sources and levels in the ocean , 2006, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[57]  George R. Cutter,et al.  Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys , 2007 .

[58]  Estimating and decomposing total uncertainty for survey-based abundance estimates of Norwegian spring-spawning herring , 2007 .

[59]  O. Godø,et al.  Silent research vessels are not quiet. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  R. Arlinghaus,et al.  A behavioral perspective on fishing-induced evolution. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  C. Michielsens,et al.  Observations of avoidance reactions of migrating salmon to a mobile survey vessel in a riverine environment , 2008 .

[62]  Christopher D. Wilson,et al.  Silent ships do not always encounter more fish: comparison of acoustic backscatter recorded by a noise-reduced and a conventional research vessel , 2008 .

[63]  C. Ryer,et al.  Evaluating the role of fish behavior in surveys conducted with underwater vehicles , 2008 .

[64]  Olav Sand,et al.  Comment on "silent research vessels are not quiet" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, EL145-EL150]. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  Correcting for vessel avoidance in acoustic-abundance estimates for herring , 2008 .

[66]  Christopher D. Wilson,et al.  Hearing Sensitivity of the Walleye Pollock , 2009 .

[67]  Dag Tjøstheim,et al.  The sampling volume of trawl and acoustics: estimating availability probabilities from observations of tracked individual fish , 2009 .

[68]  Measuring herring densities with one real and several phantom research vessels , 2009 .

[69]  Patrick J O Miller,et al.  Behavioral responses of herring (Clupea harengus) to 1-2 and 6-7 kHz sonar signals and killer whale feeding sounds. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[70]  I. Couzin Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[71]  Arthur N Popper,et al.  The effects of human-generated sound on fish. , 2009, Integrative zoology.

[72]  Christopher D. Wilson,et al.  Silent ships sometimes do encounter more fish. 2. Concurrent echosounder observations from a free-drifting buoy and vessels , 2010 .

[73]  Christopher D. Wilson,et al.  Silent ships sometimes do encounter more fish. 1. Vessel comparisons during winter pollock surveys , 2010 .

[74]  P. Sigray,et al.  Particle motion measured at an operational wind turbine in relation to hearing sensitivity in fish. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[75]  Brian Richard Wood Fish reaction to tonal vessel noise - Comparison with ICES CRR 209 methodology , 2011 .

[76]  Silent ships do not always encounter more fish (revisited): comparison of acoustic backscatter from walleye pollock recorded by a noise-reduced and a conventional research vessel in the eastern Bering Sea , 2011 .

[77]  D. L. Aksnes,et al.  Efficient trawl avoidance by mesopelagic fishes causes large underestimation of their biomass , 2012 .

[78]  Lee Freitag,et al.  Passive and active acoustics using an autonomous wave glider , 2012, J. Field Robotics.

[79]  Olav Rune Godø,et al.  Behavior of captive herring exposed to naval sonar transmissions (1.0-1.6 kHz) throughout a yearly cycle. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[80]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  The Dynamics of Coordinated Group Hunting and Collective Information Transfer among Schooling Prey , 2012, Current Biology.

[81]  E. Olson North Pacific Fishery Management Council , 2013 .

[82]  Detection and reaction of fish to infrasound , 2013 .

[83]  Olav Rune Godø,et al.  Towards an acoustic‐based coupled observation and modelling system for monitoring and predicting ecosystem dynamics of the open ocean , 2013 .