Fair Division with Interdependent Values

We introduce the study of designing allocation mechanisms for fairly allocating indivisible goods in settings with interdependent valuation functions. In our setting, there is a set of goods that needs to be allocated to a set of agents (without disposal). Each agent is given a private signal, and his valuation function depends on the signals of all agents. Without the use of payments, there are strong impossibility results for designing strategyproof allocation mechanisms even in settings without interdependent values. Therefore, we turn to design mechanisms that always admit equilibria that are fair with respect to their true signals, despite their potentially distorted perception. To do so, we first extend the definitions of pure Nash equilibrium and well-studied fairness notions in literature to the interdependent setting. We devise simple allocation mechanisms that always admit a fair equilibrium with respect to the true signals. We complement this result by showing that, even for very simple cases with binary additive interdependent valuation functions, no allocation mechanism that always admits an equilibrium, can guarantee that all equilibria are fair with respect to the true signals.

[1]  Warut Suksompong,et al.  Weighted Fair Division with Matroid-Rank Valuations: Monotonicity and Strategyproofness , 2023, ArXiv.

[2]  S. Leonardi,et al.  Round-Robin Beyond Additive Agents: Existence and Fairness of Approximate Equilibria , 2023, EC.

[3]  Yair Zick,et al.  Yankee Swap: a Fast and Simple Fair Allocation Mechanism for Matroid Rank Valuations , 2022, Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[4]  M. Feldman,et al.  Interdependent Public Projects , 2022, SODA.

[5]  P. Lu,et al.  Better Approximation for Interdependent SOS Valuations , 2022, WINE.

[6]  Paritosh Verma,et al.  Fair and Efficient Allocations Without Obvious Manipulations , 2022, NeurIPS.

[7]  Warut Suksompong,et al.  On Maximum Weighted Nash Welfare for Binary Valuations , 2022, Math. Soc. Sci..

[8]  Alexandros A. Voudouris,et al.  Fair Division of Indivisible Goods: A Survey , 2022, IJCAI.

[9]  Kira Goldner,et al.  Private Interdependent Valuations , 2021, SODA.

[10]  Siddharth Barman,et al.  Truthful and Fair Mechanisms for Matroid-Rank Valuations , 2021, AAAI.

[11]  Stefano Leonardi,et al.  Allocating Indivisible Goods to Strategic Agents: Pure Nash Equilibria and Fairness , 2021, WINE.

[12]  Inbal Talgam-Cohen,et al.  PoA of Simple Auctions with Interdependent Values , 2021, AAAI.

[13]  Moshe Babaioff,et al.  Fair-Share Allocations for Agents with Arbitrary Entitlements , 2021, EC.

[14]  Moshe Babaioff,et al.  Fair and Truthful Mechanisms for Dichotomous Valuations , 2020, AAAI.

[15]  Moshe Babaioff,et al.  Competitive Equilibria with Indivisible Goods and Generic Budgets , 2017, Math. Oper. Res..

[16]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Fair Division with Binary Valuations: One Rule to Rule Them All , 2020, WINE.

[17]  H. Aziz Simultaneously Achieving Ex-ante and Ex-post Fairness , 2020, WINE.

[18]  Warut Suksompong,et al.  Weighted Envy-freeness in Indivisible Item Allocation , 2019, AAMAS.

[19]  Inbal Talgam-Cohen,et al.  Settling the Communication Complexity of Combinatorial Auctions with Two Subadditive Buyers , 2019, 2019 IEEE 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[20]  Amos Fiat,et al.  Combinatorial Auctions with Interdependent Valuations: SOS to the Rescue , 2019, EC.

[21]  Irit Samet Equity , 2018, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[22]  Amos Fiat,et al.  Interdependent Values without Single-Crossing , 2018, EC.

[23]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Almost Envy-Freeness with General Valuations , 2017, SODA.

[24]  Evangelos Markakis,et al.  Truthful Allocation Mechanisms Without Payments: Characterization and Implications on Fairness , 2017, EC.

[25]  Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi,et al.  Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods to Asymmetric Agents , 2017, AAMAS.

[26]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  The Unreasonable Fairness of Maximum Nash Welfare , 2016, EC.

[27]  Evangelos Markakis,et al.  On Truthful Mechanisms for Maximin Share Allocations , 2016, IJCAI.

[28]  T. Roughgarden,et al.  Optimal and near-optimal mechanism design with interdependent values , 2013, EC '13.

[29]  Evangelos Markakis,et al.  On Worst-Case Allocations in the Presence of Indivisible Goods , 2011, WINE.

[30]  Eric Budish,et al.  The Combinatorial Assignment Problem: Approximate Competitive Equilibrium from Equal Incomes , 2010, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Ioannis Caragiannis,et al.  On Low-Envy Truthful Allocations , 2009, ADT.

[32]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods , 2004, EC '04.

[33]  B. Moldovanu,et al.  Efficient Design with Interdependent Valuations , 2001 .

[34]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  A theory of auctions and competitive bidding , 1982 .

[35]  H. Varian Equity, Envy and Efficiency , 1974 .

[36]  Theodore Groves,et al.  Incentives in Teams , 1973 .

[37]  E. H. Clarke Multipart pricing of public goods , 1971 .

[38]  Robert B. Wilson Communications to the Editor---Competitive Bidding with Disparate Information , 1969 .

[39]  D. Foley Resource allocation and the public sector , 1967 .

[40]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[41]  H. Steinhaus,et al.  Sur la division pragmatique , 1949 .