Reconstructing Gene Networks of Forest Trees from Gene Expression Data: Toward Higher-Resolution Approaches

In two of our recent systems biology studies of forest trees we reconstructed gene networks active in wood tissue development for an undomesticated tree genus, Populus. In the first study, we used time series data to determine gene expression dynamics underlying wood formation in response to gravitational stimulus. In the second study, we integrated data from newly generated and publicly available transcriptome profiling, transcription factor binding, DNA accessibility and genome-wide association mapping experiments, to identify relationships among genes expressed during wood formation. We demonstrated that these approaches can be used for dissecting complex developmental responses in trees, and can reveal gene clusters and mechanisms influencing poorly understood developmental processes. Combining orthogonal approaches can yield better resolved gene networks, but the resulting network modules may contain large numbers of genes. This limitation reflects the difficulty in creating a variety of experimental conditions that can reveal expression and functional differences among genes within a module, thus imposing limits on the resolving power of network models in practice. To resolve networks at a finer level we are now adding a complementary approach to our work: using cross-species gene network inference. In this approach, transcriptome assemblies of two or more species are considered together to identify expression responses common to all species and also responses that are species specific. To that end here we present a new tool, fastOC, for identifying gene co-expression networks across multiple species. We provide initial evidence that the tool works effectively in calculating co-expression modules with minimal computing requirements, thus making cross-species gene network comparison practical.

[1]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[3]  Staffan Persson,et al.  Co-expression tools for plant biology: opportunities for hypothesis generation and caveats. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[4]  David Z. Chen,et al.  Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data , 2012, Nature.

[5]  Siobhan M Brady,et al.  Systems approaches to identifying gene regulatory networks in plants. , 2008, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[6]  Antal F. Novak,et al.  networks Græmlin : General and robust alignment of multiple large interaction data , 2006 .

[7]  Jason A. Corwin,et al.  An Arabidopsis Gene Regulatory Network for Secondary Cell Wall Synthesis , 2014, Nature.

[8]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: the Dynamic Tree Cut package for R , 2008, Bioinform..

[9]  E. Schadt Molecular networks as sensors and drivers of common human diseases , 2009, Nature.

[10]  Morgan C. Giddings,et al.  Defining functional DNA elements in the human genome , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  K. Shinozaki,et al.  Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[12]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Robustness Can Evolve Gradually in Complex Regulatory Gene Networks with Varying Topology , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  Xiao Sun,et al.  Data access for the 1,000 Plants (1KP) project , 2014, GigaScience.

[14]  Roded Sharan,et al.  Fast and Accurate Alignment of Multiple Protein Networks , 2008, RECOMB.

[15]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. , 1999, Science.

[16]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[17]  Nadav S. Bar,et al.  Landscape of transcription in human cells , 2012, Nature.

[18]  A. Bergman,et al.  Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks , 2003, Nature.

[19]  Lan V. Zhang,et al.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network , 2004, Nature.

[20]  Vladimir Filkov,et al.  Transcriptional and temporal response of Populus stems to gravi-stimulation. , 2018, Journal of integrative plant biology.

[21]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Controllability of complex networks , 2011, Nature.

[22]  Elise A. R. Serin,et al.  Learning from Co-expression Networks: Possibilities and Challenges , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[23]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  OrthoClust: an orthology-based network framework for clustering data across multiple species , 2014, Genome Biology.

[24]  Bonnie Berger,et al.  IsoRankN: spectral methods for global alignment of multiple protein networks , 2009, Bioinform..

[25]  Molly Megraw,et al.  A stele-enriched gene regulatory network in the Arabidopsis root , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[26]  J. Collins,et al.  DIVERSITY-BASED, MODEL-GUIDED CONSTRUCTION OF SYNTHETIC GENE NETWORKS WITH PREDICTED FUNCTIONS , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Matthew S. Zinkgraf,et al.  Transcriptional and Hormonal Regulation of Gravitropism of Woody Stems in Populus[OPEN] , 2015, Plant Cell.

[28]  B Marshall,et al.  Gene Ontology Consortium: The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[29]  Matthew S. Zinkgraf,et al.  Identifying gene coexpression networks underlying the dynamic regulation of wood-forming tissues in Populus under diverse environmental conditions. , 2017, The New phytologist.