A Multi-label Classification Method for Detection of Combined Motor Imageries

Imaginary motor tasks cause brain oscillations that can be detected through the analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings. The imagination of hands movement allows inducing up to three different brain states by considering the activity that each hand produces separately and the one caused by the combination of both. This article presents a new method to extend the classic Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) algorithm to a multi-class approach which analyses both brain hemispheres separately to solve, together with a stepwise classification strategy, a multi-label Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) problem. The considered approach is based upon the assumption that the brain activity induced by the motor imagery (MI) of the combination of both hands corresponds to the superposition of the activity generated during simple hand MIs. In this way, based on the event-related desynchronization that is detected within each brain hemisphere, the multi-classification task can be reduced into two binary-classification problems, leading to a much simpler recognition scheme that overcomes the drawback of the classical CSP method of being suitable to discriminate only between two classes. After testing the proposed approach over the EEG signals of six healthy subjects performing a four-class multi-label task involving simple and combined hand MIs together with the rest condition, results show that this technique is plausible for BCI control. In terms of accuracy, it outperforms the classical one-vs-one approach by 20% and has the same performance as the one-vs-all method. Nevertheless, to solve a multi-label classification problem involving k classes, the proposed method requires only log2 (k) classifiers, whereas the one-vs-one method uses k (k-1)/2 classifiers and the one-vs-all k classifiers, thereby the new approach simplifies the classification task and seems promising for solving multi-label problems involving numerous classes.

[1]  Bin He,et al.  EEG Control of a Virtual Helicopter in 3-Dimensional Space Using Intelligent Control Strategies , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Motoaki Kawanabe,et al.  Stationary Common Spatial Patterns: Towards robust classification of non-stationary EEG signals , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[3]  Saso Dzeroski,et al.  An extensive experimental comparison of methods for multi-label learning , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  Christian Mühl,et al.  EEG-based workload estimation across affective contexts , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[5]  Hongzhi Qi,et al.  EEG feature comparison and classification of simple and compound limb motor imagery , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  Grigorios Tsoumakas,et al.  Multi-Label Classification: An Overview , 2007, Int. J. Data Warehous. Min..

[7]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[8]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Multiclass Common Spatial Patterns and Information , 2008 .

[9]  Min-You Chen,et al.  A multi-class pattern recognition method for motor imagery EEG data , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  Laurent Bougrain,et al.  Comparison of sensorimotor rhythms in EEG signals during simple and combined motor imageries over the contra and ipsilateral hemispheres , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[11]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Classification by Pairwise Coupling , 1997, NIPS.

[12]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Boosting bit rates in noninvasive EEG single-trial classifications by feature combination and multiclass paradigms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern Algorithm on BCI Competition IV Datasets 2a and 2b , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[14]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[16]  Christa Neuper,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Class EEG Classification for Brain Computer Interface , 2005 .

[17]  Christian Kothe,et al.  Towards passive brain–computer interfaces: applying brain–computer interface technology to human–machine systems in general , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[18]  Guillaume Gibert,et al.  OpenViBE: An Open-Source Software Platform to Design, Test, and Use BrainComputer Interfaces in Real and Virtual Environments , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[19]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice , 2012 .

[20]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Solving Multiclass Learning Problems via Error-Correcting Output Codes , 1994, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[21]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Beta rebound after different types of motor imagery in man , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Modulation of Human Cortical Rolandic Rhythms during Natural Sensorimotor Tasks , 1997, NeuroImage.

[23]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Reducing Multiclass to Binary: A Unifying Approach for Margin Classifiers , 2000, J. Mach. Learn. Res..