Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search

We investigated whether spatial filtering can restrict attentional selectivity during visual search to a currently task-relevant attentional window. While effective filtering has been demonstrated during singleton search, feature-based attention is believed to operate spatially globally across the entire visual field. To test whether spatial filtering depends on search mode, we assessed its efficiency both during feature-guided search with colour-defined targets and during singleton search tasks. Search displays were preceded by spatial cues. Participants responded to target objects at cued/relevant locations, and ignored them when they appeared on the uncued/irrelevant side. In four experiments, electrophysiological markers of attentional selection and distractor suppression (N2pc and P D components) were measured for relevant and irrelevant target-matching objects. During singleton search, N2pc components were triggered by relevant target singletons, but were entirely absent for singletons on the irrelevant side, demonstrating effective spatial filtering. Critically, similar results were found for feature-based search. N2pcs to irrelevant target-colour objects were either absent or strongly attenuated (when these objects were salient), indicating that the feature-based guidance of visual search can be restricted to relevant locations. The presence of P D components to salient objects on the irrelevant side during feature-based and singleton search suggests that spatial filtering involves active distractor suppression. These results challenge the assumption that feature-based attentional guidance is always spatially global. They suggest instead that when advance information about target locations becomes available, effective spatial filtering processes are activated transiently not only in singleton search, but also during search for feature-defined targets.

[1]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  No capture outside the attentional window , 2010, Vision Research.

[2]  G. Boynton,et al.  Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[3]  Brad Wyble,et al.  Non-singleton colors are not attended faster than categories, but they are encoded faster: A combined approach of behavior, modeling and ERPs , 2017, Vision Research.

[4]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Does focused endogenous attention prevent attentional capture in pop-out visual search? , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[5]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference , 2016, Biological Psychology.

[6]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Perceptual grouping allows for attention to cover noncontiguous locations and suppress capture from nearby locations. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Jöran Lepsien,et al.  Purely endogenous capture of attention by task-defining features proceeds independently from spatial attention , 2010, NeuroImage.

[11]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Carly J. Leonard,et al.  Interactions between space-based and feature-based attention. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Daniel B. Vatterott,et al.  The attentional window configures to object and surface boundaries , 2015 .

[14]  S. Luck,et al.  A Common Neural Mechanism for Preventing and Terminating the Allocation of Attention , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Bryan R. Burnham,et al.  Selectively ignoring locations does not modulate contingent involuntary orienting, but selectively attending does , 2018 .

[16]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Rapid parallel attentional target selection in single-color and multiple-color visual search. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  S. Luck,et al.  Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Vincent Di Lollo,et al.  Electrophysiological Indices of Target and Distractor Processing in Visual Search , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Attention selection, distractor suppression and N2pc , 2009, Cortex.

[21]  M. Bravo,et al.  The role of attention in different visual-search tasks , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Nick Berggren,et al.  Feature-guided attentional capture cannot be prevented by spatial filtering , 2018, Biological Psychology.

[23]  Walter R. Boot,et al.  What to Where: The Right Attention Set for the Wrong Location , 2019, Perception.

[24]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Ayala S Allon,et al.  Compensation mechanisms that improve distractor filtering are short-lived , 2017, Cognition.

[26]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Involuntary Attentional Capture is Determined by Task Set: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations , 2017, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[29]  M. Eimer,et al.  The spatially global control of attentional target selection in visual search , 2017 .

[30]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search. , 2017, Psychophysiology.

[31]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  S. Treue,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Increases the Selectivity of Population Responses in Primate Visual Cortex , 2004, Current Biology.

[36]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Roberto Dell'Acqua,et al.  Contralateral cortical organisation of information in visual short-term memory: Evidence from lateralized brain activity during retrieval , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Effects of Feature-selective and Spatial Attention at Different Stages of Visual Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  H E Egeth,et al.  Local processes in preattentive feature detection. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Spatial attention in early vision. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[44]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical Regularities Modulate Attentional Capture , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Tracking the Location of Visuospatial Attention in a Contingent Capture Paradigm , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  A. Schubö,et al.  Target discrimination delays attentional benefit for grouped contexts: An ERP study , 2015, Brain Research.

[48]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[49]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[51]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Global Facilitation of Attended Features Is Obligatory and Restricts Divided Attention , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.