Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jan Theeuwes,et al. No capture outside the attentional window , 2010, Vision Research.
[2] G. Boynton,et al. Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.
[3] Brad Wyble,et al. Non-singleton colors are not attended faster than categories, but they are encoded faster: A combined approach of behavior, modeling and ERPs , 2017, Vision Research.
[4] Martin Eimer,et al. Does focused endogenous attention prevent attentional capture in pop-out visual search? , 2009, Psychophysiology.
[5] Dirk Kerzel,et al. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference , 2016, Biological Psychology.
[6] J. Wolfe,et al. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[7] M. Eimer. The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[8] Dirk Kerzel,et al. Perceptual grouping allows for attention to cover noncontiguous locations and suppress capture from nearby locations. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[9] M. Posner,et al. Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[10] Jöran Lepsien,et al. Purely endogenous capture of attention by task-defining features proceeds independently from spatial attention , 2010, NeuroImage.
[11] Steven J Luck,et al. Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[12] Carly J. Leonard,et al. Interactions between space-based and feature-based attention. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[13] Daniel B. Vatterott,et al. The attentional window configures to object and surface boundaries , 2015 .
[14] S. Luck,et al. A Common Neural Mechanism for Preventing and Terminating the Allocation of Attention , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[15] Bryan R. Burnham,et al. Selectively ignoring locations does not modulate contingent involuntary orienting, but selectively attending does , 2018 .
[16] Martin Eimer,et al. Rapid parallel attentional target selection in single-color and multiple-color visual search. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] S. Luck,et al. Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.
[18] Vincent Di Lollo,et al. Electrophysiological Indices of Target and Distractor Processing in Visual Search , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[19] H. Egeth,et al. Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[20] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. Attention selection, distractor suppression and N2pc , 2009, Cortex.
[21] M. Bravo,et al. The role of attention in different visual-search tasks , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[22] Nick Berggren,et al. Feature-guided attentional capture cannot be prevented by spatial filtering , 2018, Biological Psychology.
[23] Walter R. Boot,et al. What to Where: The Right Attention Set for the Wrong Location , 2019, Perception.
[24] Jan Theeuwes,et al. The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[25] Ayala S Allon,et al. Compensation mechanisms that improve distractor filtering are short-lived , 2017, Cognition.
[26] Martin Eimer,et al. Involuntary Attentional Capture is Determined by Task Set: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[27] S. Yantis,et al. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[28] Eric Ruthruff,et al. Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations , 2017, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[29] M. Eimer,et al. The spatially global control of attentional target selection in visual search , 2017 .
[30] Dirk Kerzel,et al. Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search. , 2017, Psychophysiology.
[31] J. Duncan,et al. Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[32] R. Remington,et al. Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[33] S. Yantis,et al. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[34] Steven J. Luck,et al. The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[35] S. Treue,et al. Feature-Based Attention Increases the Selectivity of Population Responses in Primate Visual Cortex , 2004, Current Biology.
[36] S J Luck,et al. Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[37] Carlo Umiltà,et al. Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.
[38] Martin Eimer,et al. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[39] Roberto Dell'Acqua,et al. Contralateral cortical organisation of information in visual short-term memory: Evidence from lateralized brain activity during retrieval , 2012, Neuropsychologia.
[40] Søren K. Andersen,et al. Effects of Feature-selective and Spatial Attention at Different Stages of Visual Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[41] J. C. Johnston,et al. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[42] H E Egeth,et al. Local processes in preattentive feature detection. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[43] J. Theeuwes,et al. Spatial attention in early vision. , 2001, Acta psychologica.
[44] Jan Theeuwes,et al. Statistical Regularities Modulate Attentional Capture , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[45] Andrew B. Leber,et al. Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.
[46] Pierre Jolicoeur,et al. Tracking the Location of Visuospatial Attention in a Contingent Capture Paradigm , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[47] A. Schubö,et al. Target discrimination delays attentional benefit for grouped contexts: An ERP study , 2015, Brain Research.
[48] J. Theeuwes. Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.
[49] G. Boynton,et al. Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[50] Martin Eimer,et al. Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[51] Steven A. Hillyard,et al. Global Facilitation of Attended Features Is Obligatory and Restricts Divided Attention , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.