Mechanical property characterization and simulation of fused deposition modeling Polycarbonate parts

Abstract Building end-use functional parts with additive manufacturing (AM) technologies is a challenging task. Several factors influence their surface finish, dimensional accuracy, mechanical properties and cost. Their orientation inside the building chamber is one of the most significant factors in AM processes. When using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) to build such parts, additional factors must be considered. This paper aims to accomplish two purposes: finding a good model to simulate FDM parts and correlating a finite element analysis (FEA) simulation with physical testing. The first objective was achieved by experimental tensile test of specimens to determine the nine mechanical constants that defines the stiffness matrix of an orthotropic material. Three Young’s modulus, three Poisson’s ratio and three shear modulus were experimentally obtained as well as yield tensile and ultimate strength of each specimen. A simple part was designed and manufactured in different orientations to be physically tested and simulated to achieve the second objective. Polycarbonate (PC) was used as part material. Combined loading including bending and torsion was used. Differences on mechanical response were observed during the physical test of the parts depending on the building direction. Conclusions comment results and the convenience of using a different constitutive model depending on the design and use specifications.

[1]  Selçuk Güçeri,et al.  Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling , 2003 .

[2]  Ryan B. Wicker,et al.  Effects of build orientation on tensile strength for stereolithography-manufactured ASTM D-638 type I specimens , 2010 .

[3]  Domingo-EspinMiquel,et al.  Influence of Building Parameters on the Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Polycarbonate Fused Deposition Modeling Parts , 2014 .

[4]  J. Urbanic,et al.  An Experimental Study to Determine Geometric and Dimensional Accuracy Impact Factors for Fused Deposition Modelled Parts , 2012 .

[5]  Pulak M. Pandey,et al.  Experimental investigations for improving part strength in selective laser sintering , 2008 .

[6]  R. Wicker,et al.  Effects of environmental conditions, aging, and build orientations on the mechanical properties of ASTM type I specimens manufactured via stereolithography , 2012 .

[7]  S. Arunachalam,et al.  Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling , 2001 .

[8]  Siba Sankar Mahapatra,et al.  Prediction of dimensional accuracy in fused deposition modelling: a fuzzy logic approach , 2011 .

[9]  Caroline Sunyong Lee,et al.  Measurement of anisotropic compressive strength of rapid prototyping parts , 2007 .

[10]  Alberto Boschetto,et al.  Modelling micro geometrical profiles in fused deposition process , 2012 .

[11]  I. Gibson,et al.  Material properties and fabrication parameters in selective laser sintering process , 1997 .

[12]  Richard J.M. Hague,et al.  Unlocking the Design Potential of Rapid Manufacturing , 2006 .

[13]  Unny Menon,et al.  Mechanical and Dimensional Characteristics of Fused Deposition Modeling Build Styles , 1996 .

[14]  Antonio Armillotta,et al.  Assessment of surface quality on textured FDM prototypes , 2006 .

[15]  P. Vijay,et al.  Critical Parameters Effecting the Rapid Prototyping Surface Finish , 2012 .

[16]  Neil Hopkinson,et al.  Effect of section thickness and build orientation on tensile properties and material characteristics of laser sintered nylon‐12 parts , 2011 .

[17]  Jaroslaw Kotlinski,et al.  Mechanical properties of commercial rapid prototyping materials , 2014 .

[18]  Ismail Durgun,et al.  Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost , 2014 .

[19]  A. K. Sood,et al.  Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts , 2010 .

[20]  N. Jawahar,et al.  Optimization of stereolithography process parameters for part strength using design of experiments , 2006 .

[21]  Srinivasa Prakash Regalla,et al.  Optimization of Support Material and Build Time in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) , 2011 .

[22]  Ruzy Haryati Hambali,et al.  Effect of build orientation on FDM parts:a case study for validation of deformation behaviour by FEA , 2010 .

[23]  P. Wright,et al.  Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS , 2002 .

[24]  K.K.B. Hon,et al.  Optimising build parameters for improved surface finish in stereolithography , 1998 .

[25]  Constance W. Ziemian,et al.  Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modelling , 2012 .

[26]  G. Rizvi,et al.  Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments , 2008 .

[27]  Anoop Kumar Sood,et al.  Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement , 2012 .

[28]  Neil Hopkinson,et al.  Investigating mechanical anisotropy and end-of-vector effect in laser-sintered nylon parts , 2006 .

[29]  Agnes Bagsik,et al.  MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF FUSED DEPOSITION MODELING PARTS MANUFACTURED WITH ULTEM*9085 , 2011 .

[30]  Pulak M. Pandey,et al.  Effect of delay time on part strength in selective laser sintering , 2009 .

[31]  K. Leong,et al.  Investigation of the mechanical properties and porosity relationships in fused deposition modelling‐fabricated porous structures , 2006 .

[32]  A. K. Sood,et al.  Improving dimensional accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method , 2009 .

[33]  Neri Volpato,et al.  The influence of support base on FDM accuracy in Z , 2014 .