Effect of tennis racket parameters on a simulated groundstroke

Abstract Composite materials have given manufacturers the freedom to develop a broad range of tennis rackets, allowing them to change key parameters such as the structural stiffness, mass, and position of the balance point. The aim of this research was to determine how changing these parameters could affect ball resultant rebound velocity and spin for a simulated groundstroke. A finite element model of a freely suspended racket and strings was used to determine the effect of racket parameters for oblique spinning impacts at a range of locations on the stringbed. The finite element simulations were conducted in the laboratory frame of reference, where the ball is projected onto an initially stationary racket. The mean rebound velocity of the ball was 9% higher for a structurally stiff racket, 37% higher for a heavy racket, and 32% higher for a head-heavy racket. In addition, the mean rebound topspin of the ball was 23% higher for a heavy racket and 21% higher for a head-heavy racket. Therefore, in relation to a groundstroke with an impact location away from the node, the rebound velocity of the ball is likely to increase with the structural stiffness of a racket. The effect of changing the mass and position of the balance point is more complex, as it is dependent on the relationship between the transverse moment of inertia and maximum pre-impact swing velocity.

[1]  Rod Cross,et al.  Performance versus moment of inertia of sporting implements , 2009 .

[2]  Steve Haake,et al.  3D player testing results from the Wimbledon qualifying tournament , 2007 .

[3]  Howard Brody,et al.  Models of Tennis Racket Impacts , 1987 .

[4]  Ulrich Glitsch,et al.  MODELING OF ELASTIC RACKET PROPERTIES IN THE DYNAMIC COMPUTER SIMULATION OF TENNIS , 1998 .

[5]  Yoshihiko Kawazoe.  Mechanism of High-Tech Tennis Rackets Performance , 2002 .

[6]  R. Cross,et al.  Effects of swing-weight on swing speed and racket power , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[7]  Gu Yaodong,et al.  DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF TENNIS RACKET AND STRING , 2006 .

[8]  H. Lammer,et al.  9 – Materials and tennis rackets , 2003 .

[9]  Ewald M. Hennig,et al.  BALL IMPACT LOCATION ON A TENNIS RACKET HEAD AND ITS INFLUENCE ON BALL SPEED, ARM SHOCK AND VIBRATION , 1998 .

[10]  Steve Haake,et al.  Ball spin generation for oblique impacts with a tennis racket , 2004 .

[11]  Herbert Hatze.  Impact Probability Distribution, Sweet Spot, and the Concept of an Effective Power Region in Tennis Rackets , 1994 .

[12]  Steve Haake,et al.  Ball and Racket Movements Recorded at the 2006 Wimbledon Qualifying Tournament (P109) , 2008 .

[13]  Steve Haake,et al.  Modelling of an impact between a tennis ball and racket , 2003 .

[14]  D. Knudson.  EFFECT OF GRIP MODELS ON REBOUND ACCURACY OF OFF-CENTER TENNIS IMPACTS , 1997 .

[15]  Rob Bower,et al.  Tennis racquet stiffness and string tension effects on rebound velocity and angle for an oblique impact , 1999 .

[16]  Jamie Douglas,et al.  Measuring Ball Spin Off a Tennis Racket , 2006 .

[17]  H. Brody,et al.  The physics of tennis. III. The ball–racket interaction , 1997 .

[18]  Simon Richard Goodwill.  The dynamics of tennis ball impacts on tennis rackets. , 2002 .

[19]  Steve Haake,et al.  Experimental Validation of a Tennis Ball Finite-element Model for Different Temperatures (P22) , 2007 .

[20]  Steve Haake,et al.  Experimental Validation of a Finite-element Model of a Tennis Racket String-bed (P21) , 2008 .

[21]  Simon Bruce Choppin,et al.  Modelling of tennis racket impacts in 3D using elite players. , 2008 .

[22]  Steve Haake,et al.  Investigations into the effect of grip tightness on off-centre forehand strikes in tennis , 2010 .

[23]  Manssour H. Moeinzadeh,et al.  Finite Element Modeling of a Tennis Racket with Variable String Patterns and Tensions , 1990 .

[24]  Herbert Hatze.  The Relationship between the Coefficient of Restitution and Energy Losses in Tennis Rackets , 1993 .

[25]  Bruce Elliott.  The Influence of Tennis Racket Flexibility and String Tension on Rebound Velocity Following a Dynamic Impact , 1982 .

[26]  H. Brody,et al.  Physics of the tennis racket , 1979 .

[27]  Sean R. Mitchell,et al.  Head speed vs. racket inertia in the tennis serve , 2000 .

[28]  Steve Haake,et al.  The evolution of the tennis racket and its effect on serve speed , 2007 .

[29]  Carol A. Putnam,et al.  Theoretical Modeling of Grip Firmness during Ball-Racket Impact , 1984 .

[30]  Steve Haake,et al.  Comparison of a finite element model of a tennis racket to experimental data , 2009 .

[31]  Steve Haake,et al.  Spring damper model of an impact between a tennis ball and racket , 2001 .

[32]  John Kelley,et al.  Ball Spin Generation at the 2007 Wimbledon Qualifying Tournament (P110) , 2008 .

[33]  S. Miller,et al.  Modern tennis rackets, balls, and surfaces , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[34]  Rod Cross.  Customising a tennis racket by adding weights , 2001 .

[35]  S Adali,et al.  Mathematical modelling and simulation of a tennis racket. , 1981, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[36]  Wei-Yang Lu,et al.  Dynamics of the Interactions between Ball, Strings, and Racket in Tennis , 1992 .

[37]  Steve Haake,et al.  Effect of friction on tennis ball impacts , 2010 .

[38]  D V Knudson.  Factors affecting force loading on the hand in the tennis forehand. , 1991, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[39]  R. Cross.  The sweet spots of a tennis racquet , 1999 .

[40]  Steve Haake,et al.  Ball spin generation by elite players during match play , 2007 .

[41]  Seung Han Yang,et al.  Effects of string tension and impact location on tennis playing , 2009 .

[42]  Steve Haake,et al.  Effect of string tension on the impact between a tennis ball and racket , 2004 .

[43]  Rod Cross,et al.  Impact of a ball with a bat or racket , 1999 .

[44]  Steve Haake,et al.  Experimental and finite element analysis of a tennis ball impact on a rigid surface , 2005 .