Similar star formation rate and metallicity variability time-scales drive the fundamental metallicity relation

The fundamental metallicity relation (FMR) is a postulated correlation between galaxy stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), and gas-phase metallicity. At its core, this relation posits that offsets from the mass-metallicity relation (MZR) at a fixed stellar mass are correlated with galactic SFR. In this Letter, we quantify the timescale with which galactic SFRs and metallicities evolve using hydrodynamical simulations. We find that Illustris and IllustrisTNG predict that galaxy offsets from the star formation main sequence and MZR evolve over similar timescales, are often anti-correlated in their evolution, evolve with the halo dynamical time, and produce a pronounced FMR. In fact, for a FMR to exist, the metallicity and SFR must evolve in an anti-correlated sense which requires that they evolve with similar time variability. In contrast to Illustris and IllustrisTNG, we speculate that the SFR and metallicity evolution tracks may become decoupled in galaxy formation models dominated by globally-bursty SFR histories, which could weaken the FMR residual correlation strength. This opens the possibility of discriminating between bursty and non-bursty feedback models based on the strength and persistence of the FMR -- especially at high redshift.

[1]  J. Barrera-Ballesteros,et al.  Star formation is boosted (and quenched) from the inside-out: radial star formation profiles from MaNGA , 2017, 1711.00915.

[2]  L. Cortese,et al.  The role of atomic hydrogen in regulating the scatter of the mass-metallicity relation , 2017, 1709.07890.

[3]  Cca,et al.  The uniformity and time-invariance of the intra-cluster metal distribution in galaxy clusters from the IllustrisTNG simulations , 2017, 1707.05318.

[4]  Annalisa Pillepich,et al.  First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies , 2017, 1707.03406.

[5]  G. Kauffmann,et al.  First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the galaxy colour bimodality , 2017, 1707.03395.

[6]  Cca,et al.  First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: matter and galaxy clustering , 2017, 1707.03397.

[7]  Annalisa Pillepich,et al.  Simulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model , 2017, 1703.02970.

[8]  T. Heckman,et al.  Separate Ways: The Mass–Metallicity Relation Does Not Strongly Correlate with Star Formation Rate in SDSS-IV MaNGA Galaxies , 2017, 1706.09893.

[9]  R. Bower,et al.  Galaxy metallicity scaling relations in the EAGLE simulations , 2017, 1704.00006.

[10]  L. Galbany,et al.  The Mass-Metallicity Relation revisited with CALIFA , 2017, 1703.09769.

[11]  P. Hopkins,et al.  MUFASA: Galaxy star formation, gas, and metal properties across cosmic time , 2016, 1610.01626.

[12]  V. Springel,et al.  Simulating galaxy formation with black hole driven thermal and kinetic feedback , 2016, 1607.03486.

[13]  K. Finlator,et al.  Equilibrium model prediction for the scatter in the star-forming main sequence , 2016, 1606.07436.

[14]  P. Hopkins,et al.  (Star)bursts of FIRE: observational signatures of bursty star formation in galaxies , 2015, 1510.03869.

[15]  K. Finlator.  Gas Accretion and Galactic Chemical Evolution: Theory and Observations , 2016, 1612.00802.

[16]  J. Dalcanton,et al.  EXPLORING SYSTEMATIC EFFECTS IN THE RELATION BETWEEN STELLAR MASS, GAS PHASE METALLICITY, AND STAR FORMATION RATE , 2016, 1606.08850.

[17]  J. Wagg,et al.  Galaxy metallicities depend primarily on stellar mass and molecular gas mass , 2016, 1606.04102.

[18]  S. Genel.  HOW ENVIRONMENT AFFECTS GALAXY METALLICITY THROUGH STRIPPING AND FORMATION HISTORY: LESSONS FROM THE ILLUSTRIS SIMULATION , 2016, 1602.02773.

[19]  R. Bower,et al.  The Fundamental Plane of star formation in galaxies revealed by the EAGLE hydrodynamical simulations , 2015, 1510.08067.

[20]  K. Glazebrook,et al.  The Subaru FMOS Galaxy Redshift Survey (FastSound). III. The mass-metallicity relation and the fundamental metallicity relation at $z\sim1.4$ , 2015, 1508.01512.

[21]  L. Christensen,et al.  Merging galaxies produce outliers from the fundamental metallicity relation , 2015, 1506.00551.

[22]  J. Brinchmann,et al.  A CRITICAL LOOK AT THE MASS–METALLICITY–STAR FORMATION RATE RELATION IN THE LOCAL UNIVERSE. I. AN IMPROVED ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK AND CONFOUNDING SYSTEMATICS , 2014, 1411.7391.

[23]  A. M. Swinbank,et al.  A relationship between specific star formation rate and metallicity gradient within z ∼ 1 galaxies from KMOS-HiZELS , 2014, 1407.1047.

[24]  L. Kewley,et al.  THE UNIVERSAL RELATION OF GALACTIC CHEMICAL EVOLUTION: THE ORIGIN OF THE MASS–METALLICITY RELATION , 2014, 1404.7526.

[25]  A. Dekel,et al.  On the origin of the fundamental metallicity relation and the scatter in galaxy scaling relations , 2013, 1311.1509.

[26]  V. Springel,et al.  A model for cosmological simulations of galaxy formation physics: multi-epoch validation , 2013, 1305.4931.

[27]  F. Mannucci,et al.  A fundamental relation between the metallicity, gas content, and stellar mass of local galaxies , 2013, 1304.4940.

[28]  K. Jahnke,et al.  Mass-metallicity relation explored with CALIFA I. Is there a dependence on the star-formation rate? , 2013, 1304.2158.

[29]  C. Carollo,et al.  GAS REGULATION OF GALAXIES: THE EVOLUTION OF THE COSMIC SPECIFIC STAR FORMATION RATE, THE METALLICITY–MASS–STAR-FORMATION RATE RELATION, AND THE STELLAR CONTENT OF HALOS , 2013, 1303.5059.

[30]  J. Richard,et al.  TESTING THE UNIVERSALITY OF THE FUNDAMENTAL METALLICITY RELATION AT HIGH REDSHIFT USING LOW-MASS GRAVITATIONALLY LENSED GALAXIES , 2013, 1302.3614.

[31]  B. Andrews,et al.  THE MASS–METALLICITY RELATION WITH THE DIRECT METHOD ON STACKED SPECTRA OF SDSS GALAXIES , 2012, 1211.3418.

[32]  L. Kewley,et al.  THE METALLICITY EVOLUTION OF INTERACTING GALAXIES , 2011, 1107.0001.

[33]  G. Kauffmann,et al.  The relation between metallicity, stellar mass and star formation in galaxies: an analysis of observational and model data , 2011, 1107.3145.

[34]  M. S'anchez-Portal,et al.  A fundamental plane for field star-forming galaxies , 2010, 1005.0509.

[35]  F. Mannucci,et al.  A fundamental relation between mass, SFR and metallicity in local and high redshift galaxies , 2010, 1005.0006.

[36]  A. McConnachie,et al.  Clues to the Origin of the Mass-Metallicity Relation: Dependence on Star Formation Rate and Galaxy Size , 2007, 0711.4833.

[37]  J. Brinkmann,et al.  The Origin of the Mass-Metallicity Relation: Insights from 53,000 Star-forming Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2004, astro-ph/0405537.