Comparison of prenatal muscle tissue expression profiles of two pig breeds differing in muscle characteristics.

The objective of this study was to compare purebred Duroc and Pietrain prenatal muscle tissue transcriptome expression levels at different stages of prenatal development to gain insight into the differences in muscle tissue development in these pig breeds. Commercial western pig breeds have been selected for muscle growth for the past 2 decades. Pig breeds differ for their muscle phenotypes (i.e., myofiber numbers and myofiber types). Duroc and Pietrain pig breeds are extremes; Duroc pigs have redder muscle fiber types with more intramuscular fat, and Pietrain pigs have faster-growing and whiter muscle fiber types. Pietrain pigs are more muscular than Duroc pigs, whereas Duroc pigs are fatter than Pietrain pigs. The genomic background underlying these breed-specific differences is poorly known. Myogenesis is a complex exclusive prenatal process involving proliferation and differentiation (i.e., fusion) of precursor cells called myoblasts. We investigated the difference in the prenatal muscle-specific transcriptome profiles of Duroc and Pietrain pigs using microarray technology. The microarray contained more than 500 genes affecting myogenesis, energy metabolism, muscle structural genes, and other genes from a porcine muscle cDNA library. The results indicated that the expression of the myogenesis-related genes was greater in early Duroc embryos than in early Pietrain embryos (14 to 49 d of gestation), whereas the opposite was found in late embryos (63 to 91 d of gestation). These findings suggest that the myogenesis process is more intense in early Duroc embryos than in Pietrain embryos but that myogenesis is more intense in late Pietrain fetuses than in Duroc fetuses. Transcriptomes of muscle structural genes followed that pattern. The energy metabolism genes were expressed at a higher level in prenatal Pietrain pigs than in prenatal Duroc pigs, except for d 35, when the opposite situation was found. Fatty acid metabolism genes were expressed at a higher level in early (14 to 49 d of gestation) Duroc embryos than in Pietrain embryos. Better understanding of the genomic regulation of tissue formation leads to improved knowledge of the genome under selection and may lead to directed breed-specific changes in the future.

[1]  G. Goldspink,et al.  A possible indicator muscle for the fibre content and growth characteristics of porcine muscle , 1973 .

[2]  W. Cleveland.  Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[3]  N. Stickland,et al.  Muscle development in large and small pig fetuses. , 1983, Journal of anatomy.

[4]  E. Olson.  MyoD family: a paradigm for development? , 1990, Genes & development.

[5]  Bente J⊘rgensen,et al.  Genetics of leg weakness in boars at the Danish pig breeding stations. , 1990 .

[6]  Robert K. Davis,et al.  The myoD gene family: nodal point during specification of the muscle cell lineage. , 1991, Science.

[7]  N. Stickland,et al.  Sources of variation in myofibre number within and between litters of pigs , 1991 .

[8]  R. Ivarie,et al.  Delayed somite formation in a quail line exhibiting myofiber hyperplasia is accompanied by delayed expression of myogenic regulatory factors and myosin heavy chain. , 1993, Development.

[9]  N. Stickland,et al.  Muscle cellularity and postnatal growth in the pig. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[10]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Genetic aspects of domestication, common breeds and their origin. , 1998 .

[11]  W. Buist,et al.  Genetic variation at the porcine MYF-5 gene locus. Lack of association with meat production traits , 1999, Mammalian Genome.

[12]  P. Zambonelli,et al.  Analysis of expressed sequence tags of porcine skeletal muscle. , 1999, Gene.

[13]  M. T. te Pas,et al.  Influences of myogenin genotypes on birth weight, growth rate, carcass weight, backfat thickness, and lean weight of pigs. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[14]  K. Ender,et al.  Myogenesis and postnatal skeletal muscle cell growth as influenced by selection , 2000 .

[15]  M. T. te Pas,et al.  Messenger ribonucleic acid expression of the MyoD gene family in muscle tissue at slaughter in relation to selection for porcine growth rate. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[16]  S. Dudoit,et al.  Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  P. Wigmore,et al.  Molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in the generation of fiber diversity during myogenesis. , 2002, International review of cytology.

[18]  M. Yerle,et al.  Isolation of porcine expressed sequence tags for the construction of a first genomic transcript map of the skeletal muscle in pig. , 2002, Animal genetics.

[19]  Mallika Singh,et al.  An integrated functional genomics screening program reveals a role for BMP-9 in glucose homeostasis , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Taesung Park,et al.  Evaluation of normalization methods for microarray data , 2003 .

[21]  M. Rudnicki,et al.  Looking back to the embryo: defining transcriptional networks in adult myogenesis , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[22]  J. L. Rosa,et al.  Regulation of ubiquitous 6‐phosphofructo‐2‐kinase by the ubiquitin‐proteasome proteolytic pathway during myogenic C2C12 cell differentiation , 2003, FEBS letters.

[23]  L. Peelman,et al.  Linkage and radiation hybrid mapping of the porcine MEF2D gene to chromosome 4q. , 2003, Animal genetics.

[24]  W. Siegert,et al.  Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[25]  E. Olson,et al.  Molecular control of myogenesis: antagonism between growth and differentiation , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry.

[26]  A. Voronina.  Translational Regulation in Early Development of Eukaryotes , 2002, Molecular Biology.

[27]  M. Francaux,et al.  Creatine increases IGF‐I and myogenic regulatory factor mRNA in C2C12 cells , 2004, FEBS letters.