A modular tool for analyzing cascade impactors data to improve exposure assessment to airborne nanomaterials

Cascade impactors are widely used to provide particle size distributions for the study of aerosols in workplaces and ambient air. In the frame of exposure assessment to airborne particles, one of their main advantages is the possibility to perform further off-line analysis (e.g. electron microscopy, physical-chemical characterization by XRD, ICP-MS, etc.) on the collected samples according to particle size. However, the large channel width makes the particle size distributions not enough size-resolved. Furthermore, in spite of the sharpness of the collection efficiency curves, the existence of an overlap between stages renders data interpretation difficult. This work aim was to develop a modular program allowing the inversion of data stemming from cascade impactors based on the mass (or any quantity) collected on each impaction stage. Through a precise description of the collection efficiency curves of the different stages, the software provides a continuous curve (from 100 to 1000 points) using the Markowski method, and more particularly the Twomey iterative algorithm, according to several publications about inverse problems in cascade impactors. An additional option consists in determining the experimental error at each point of the inverse curve, performed by realizing several consecutive inversions. The inversion procedure was first tested and optimized for the case of the SIOUTAS personal sampler. Validation of the calculation was performed considering theoretical aerosols. Then, the software was used for two sets of data obtained during field measurement campaigns.

[1]  Hwa-Chi Wang,et al.  Adaptation of the Twomey Algorithm to the Inversion of Cascade Impactor Data , 1990 .

[2]  J. Keskinen,et al.  Simulation of low pressure impactor collection efficiency curves , 2011 .

[3]  J. Vincent,et al.  Towards a general semi-empirical model for the aspiration efficiencies of aerosol samplers in perfectly calm air , 2004 .

[4]  William A Heitbrink,et al.  Relationships Among Particle Number, Surface Area, and Respirable Mass Concentrations in Automotive Engine Manufacturing , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[5]  Charles L Geraci,et al.  A Strategy for Assessing Workplace Exposures to Nanomaterials , 2011, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[6]  Marshall W. Anderson,et al.  Aerodynamic versus physical size of spores: Measurement and implication for respiratory deposition , 2001 .

[7]  D. Leith,et al.  Sampling and Analysis Using Filters , 2011 .

[8]  N. P. Vaughan,et al.  The Andersen impactor: Calibration, wall losses and numerical simulation , 1989 .

[9]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ELECTRICAL LOW-PRESSURE IMPACTOR (ELPI) , 2000 .

[10]  P. Koutrakis,et al.  A compact multistage (cascade) impactor for the characterization of atmospheric aerosols , 2004 .

[11]  Philippe Duquenne,et al.  Aerosolisation of Escherichia coli and associated endotoxin using an improved bubbling bioaerosol generator , 2011 .

[12]  Risto Hillamo,et al.  On the Performance of the Berner Low Pressure Impactor , 1991 .

[13]  K. W. Lee,et al.  Design and calibration of a 5-stage cascade impactor (K-JIST cascade impactor) , 2003 .

[14]  V. Marple,et al.  Sampling and Measurement Using Inertial, Gravitational, Centrifugal, and Thermal Techniques , 2011 .

[15]  Icrp Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection , 1994 .

[16]  C. Sioutas,et al.  Development and evaluation of a personal cascade impactor sampler (PCIS) , 2002 .

[17]  Philippe Duquenne,et al.  Generation of Actinomycetes Aerosols Containing Spores and Mycelium: Performances of a Liquid Bubbling Aerosolizer , 2013 .

[18]  S. Twomey Comparison of constrained linear inversion and an iterative nonlinear algorithm applied to the indirect estimation of particle size distributions , 1975 .

[19]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  Fine particle losses in electrical low-pressure impactor , 2001 .

[20]  Gregory R. Markowski,et al.  Improving Twomey's Algorithm for Inversion of Aerosol Measurement Data , 1987 .

[21]  Christof Asbach,et al.  Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review , 2011, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[22]  V A Marple,et al.  A personal cascade impactor: design, evaluation and calibration. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[23]  J. Keskinen,et al.  ELPI Response and Data Reduction I: Response Functions , 2005 .

[24]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  Electrical low pressure impactor , 1992 .

[25]  Derk Brouwer,et al.  Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in different workplaces. , 2010, Toxicology.

[26]  J. Kinsey,et al.  Inverting cascade impactor data for size-resolved characterization of fine particulate source emissions , 2004 .

[27]  Lang Tran,et al.  Safe handling of nanotechnology , 2006, Nature.

[28]  R. Aitken,et al.  Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities and future requirements , 2007 .

[29]  Moustafa T. Chahine,et al.  Determination of the Temperature Profile in an Atmosphere from its Outgoing Radiance , 1968 .

[30]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .