Species Sensitivity Distributions Revisited: A Critical Appraisal

We revisit the assumptions associated with the derivation and application of species sensitivity distributions (SSDs). Our questions are (1) Do SSDs clarify or obscure the setting of ecological effects thresholds for risk assessment? and (2) Do SSDs reduce or introduce uncertainty into risk assessment? Our conclusions are that if we could determine a community sensitivity distribution, this would provide a better estimate of an ecologically relevant effects threshold and therefore be an improvement for risk assessment. However, the distributions generated are typically based on haphazard collections of species and endpoints and by adjusting these to reflect more realistic trophic structures we show that effects thresholds can be shifted but in a direction and to an extent that is not predictable. Despite claims that the SSD approach uses all available data to assess effects, we demonstrate that in certain frequently used applications only a small fraction of the species going into the SSD determine the effects threshold. If the SSD approach is to lead to better risk assessments, improvements are needed in how the theory is put into practice. This requires careful definition of the risk assessment targets and of the species and endpoints selected for use in generating SSDs.

[1]  T. Albanis,et al.  Ecological risk assessment of agrochemicals in European estuaries , 1999 .

[2]  M. C. Newman,et al.  Applying species‐sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: Assumptions of distribution type and sufficient numbers of species , 2000 .

[3]  Edward J. Calabrese,et al.  Performing Ecological Risk Assessments , 1993 .

[4]  Valery E. Forbes,et al.  A critique of the use of distribution-based extrapolation models in ecotoxicology , 1993 .

[5]  John Toll,et al.  Aquatic ecological risks posed by tributyltin in united states surface waters: Pre‐1989 to 1996 data , 1999 .

[6]  Shyam K. Nair,et al.  Characterizing aquatic ecological risks from pesticides using a diquat dibromide case study III. Ecological process models , 2000 .

[7]  S. Bartell,et al.  Characterizing aquatic ecological risks from pesticides using a diquat dibromide case study. II. Approaches using quotients and distributions , 2000 .

[8]  Scott E. Belanger,et al.  Understanding single‐species and model ecosystem sensitivity: Data‐based comparison , 1999 .

[9]  Rebecca A. Efroymson,et al.  Ecological risk assessment in a large river‐reservoir: 3. Benthic invertebrates , 1999 .

[10]  Tom C. J. Feijtel,et al.  Predicted no‐effect concentrations and risk characterization of four surfactants: Linear alkyl benzene sulfonate, alcohol ethoxylates, alcohol ethoxylated sulfates, and soap , 1999 .

[11]  R. Paine Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[12]  W Slob,et al.  Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. , 1993, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[13]  K. Solomon,et al.  Probabilistic risk assessment of cotton pyrethroids: I. Distributional analyses of laboratory aquatic toxicity data , 2001, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[14]  M. Zeeman,et al.  Ecological Hazard Evaluation and Risk Assessment Under EPA's Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): An Introduction , 1993 .

[15]  R. Sibly,et al.  Are current species extrapolation models a good basis for ecological risk assessment? , 2001, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[16]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Redundancy in Ecosystems , 1994 .

[17]  T. Crommentuijn,et al.  Evaluation of the dutch environmental risk limits for metals by application of the added risk approach , 2000 .

[18]  Connie Wagner,et al.  Estimation of ecotoxicological protection levels from NOEC toxicity data , 1991 .

[19]  Rebecca A. Efroymson,et al.  Ecological risk assessment in a large river‐reservoir: 2. Fish community , 1999 .

[20]  J. Giesy,et al.  Chlorpyrifos: ecological risk assessment in North American aquatic environments. , 1999, Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[21]  D. O. Logofet Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation , 2002 .

[22]  George P. Cobb,et al.  An ecological risk assessment for the use of the biocide, dibromonitrilopropionamide (DBNPA), in industrial cooling systems , 1996 .

[23]  M. Acevedo,et al.  Methodology for the evaluation of cumulative episodic exposure to chemical stressors in aquatic risk assessment , 2000 .

[24]  L. Hall,et al.  Ecological risk assessment of copper and cadmium in surface waters of Chesapeake Bay watershed , 1998 .

[25]  John Cairns,et al.  The Relationship Between Ecosystem Health and Delivery of Ecosystem Services , 1995 .