Perception and Acceptance of Health Informatics Learning among Health-Related Students in Jordan and Palestine

This study used a tailored version of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to assess Jordanian and Palestinian students' attitudes and beliefs toward learning of health informatics (HI), determine their intention to learn, assess the needed HI skills, and determine reasons that could motivate students to study HI. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among undergraduate senior students in health — oriented disciplines in four universities in Jordan and Palestine. A sample of students was emailed the link to the web-based questionnaire and was voluntarily requested to fill the questionnaire. A total of 891 students responded to the study questionnaire. The majority (82.7%) of students were interested in learning HI. About 62.8% of students reported that they will take a set of HI courses as a pathway in their undergraduate degree if they are given such an opportunity. More than 70% of students perceived HI learning as useful. About three quarters of students had a behavioral intention to enter the HI program and about two thirds (75.4%) reported that they are enthusiastic about the use of health information technology in patient care in future medical practice. Higher ratings on perceived usefulness (r = 0.73), perceived ease of learning and use of HI (r =0.76), attitude toward HI (r =0.83), enabling environment (r = 0.44) were significantly associated with higher behavioral intention to learn HI. In conclusion, students perceived HI learning as useful and easy, had a positive attitude toward HI, and had a high intention to learn HI.

[1]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[2]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[3]  Trevor Cohen,et al.  The evolution of a novel biomedical informatics curriculum for medical students. , 2012, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[4]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[5]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Joel T. Johnson,et al.  Students’ and Residents’ Perceptions Regarding Technology in Medical Training , 2006, Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry.

[7]  R. Shroff,et al.  Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students' behavioural intention to use an e-portfolio system , 2011 .

[8]  Ing-Long Wu,et al.  The adoption of mobile healthcare by hospital's professionals: An integrative perspective , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Said S. Al-Gahtani,et al.  The Applicability of TAM Outside North America: An Empirical Test in the United Kingdom , 2001, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[10]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[11]  R. Arteaga Sánchez,et al.  Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[13]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Elizabeth M. Borycki,et al.  Educating Health Professionals about the Electronic Health Record (EHR): Removing the Barriers to Adoption , 2011 .

[15]  Joyce A. Mitchell,et al.  Medical students' perspectives on biomedical informatics learning objectives , 2013, International Journal of Medical Education.

[16]  K. McGlade,et al.  Preparing tomorrow's doctors: the impact of a special study module in medical informatics. , 2001 .

[17]  M. Fetter Enhancing Baccalaureate Nursing Information Technology Outcomes: Faculty Perspectives , 2008, International journal of nursing education scholarship.