How DRACMA changes clinical decision for the individual patient in CMA therapy

Purpose of reviewTo describe the impact of the diagnosis and rationale for action against cow's milk allergy (DRACMA) guidelines on the decision process in the therapy of cow's milk allergy (CMA). Recent findingsWe report here the experience of a 2-year application of DRACMA worldwide. Variations in the socioeconomic profile of CMA sufferers and their context can modify the application of DRACMA recommendations. As an example, we use the country-by-country modifications of the social structure and the modifications of the prices for special formula in Italy. SummaryThe DRACMA guidelines were issued to inform formula choice for CMA treatment by integrating patients’ underlying values, preferences and remarks into grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) recommendations, which serve to facilitate their interpretation. This method allows every pediatrician/allergist to follow the changing variables of formulas (cost, palatability, nutritional value) and tailor their prescription for individual patients accordingly. The art of CMA treatment has always relied on physicians’ interpretation and the goal of the DRACMA guidelines is to provide a rationale-based and evidence-based indication for choosing an appropriate formula.

[1]  H. Schünemann,et al.  Oral immunotherapy for IgE‐mediated cow's milk allergy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2012, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[2]  H. Wichmann,et al.  Long-term effects of hydrolyzed protein infant formulas on growth--extended follow-up to 10 y of age: results from the German Infant Nutritional Intervention (GINI) study. , 2011, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[3]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines Part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations , 2011, Allergy.

[4]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Differential Growth Patterns Among Healthy Infants Fed Protein Hydrolysate or Cow-Milk Formulas , 2011, Pediatrics.

[6]  Jan Brozek,et al.  Diagnosis and Rationale for Action Against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA): a summary report. , 2010, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[7]  H. Schünemann,et al.  GRADE system: new paradigm , 2010, Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology.

[8]  S. Vieths,et al.  World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines , 2010, Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology.

[9]  Enrico Compalati,et al.  World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines , 2010, The World Allergy Organization journal.

[10]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies , 2009, Allergy.

[11]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines , 2009, Allergy.

[12]  A. Horvath,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE: grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Going from evidence to recommendations , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GrADe : what is “ quality of evidence ” and why is it important to clinicians ? rATING quALITY of evIDeNCe AND STreNGTH of reCommeNDATIoNS , 2022 .

[16]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  A. Day,et al.  Guidelines for the use of infant formulas to treat cows milk protein allergy: an Australian consensus panel opinion , 2008, The Medical journal of Australia.

[18]  B. Niggemann,et al.  Eczematous reactions to food in atopic eczema: position paper of the EAACI and GA2LEN , 2007, Allergy.

[19]  A. Muraro,et al.  Dietary products used in infants for treatment and prevention of food allergy. , 1999, Archives of disease in childhood.

[20]  B. Yawn,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: summary of the NIAID-Sponsored Expert Panel report. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[21]  Carol Byrd-Bredbenner,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: summary of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel report. , 2011, Nutrition research.

[22]  Z. Hui Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Cow's Milk Protein Allergy in Infants , 2009 .