Concurrent Crashing and Overlapping in Product Development

This research addresses two common tools for reducing product development lead times: overlapping of development stages and crashing of development times. For the first time in the product development literature, a formal model addresses both tools concurrently, thus facilitating analysis of the interdependencies between overlapping and crashing. The results exhibit the necessity of addressing overlapping and crashing concurrently, and exhibit general characteristics of optimal overlapping/crashing policies. The impact of different evolution/sensitivity constellations on optimal policies is investigated, and comprehensive guidelines for structuring development processes are provided. For the special case of linear costs, an efficient procedure is presented that generates the efficient time-cost trade-off curves and determines the corresponding optimal overlapping/crashing policies. The impact of key parameters and the robustness regarding their estimates is illustrated with a simple two-stage example.

[1]  J. Horowitz,et al.  Critical Path Problems with Concave Cost-Time Curves , 1972 .

[2]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  Managing the new product development process , 1985 .

[3]  R. Cordero.  Managing for speed to avoid product obsolescence: A survey of techniques , 1991 .

[4]  E. B. Berman,et al.  Resource Allocation in a PERT Network Under Continuous Activity Time-Cost Functions , 1964 .

[5]  Reza H. Ahmadi,et al.  Structuring product development processes , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Ware Myers,et al.  Measures for Excellence: Reliable Software on Time, Within Budget , 1991 .

[7]  A. Kanda,et al.  A network flow procedure for project crashing with penalty nodes , 1984 .

[8]  E. Mansfield.  Research and innovation in the modern corporation , 1972 .

[9]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Communication and Uncertainty in Concurrent Engineering , 1998 .

[10]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Samuel B. Graves.  The time-cost tradeoff in research and development: A review , 1989 .

[12]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  Integrating Design and Manufacturing to Deploy Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 1987 .

[13]  S D Eppinger,et al.  Innovation at the speed of information. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[14]  Fred P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month , 1975, Reliable Software.

[15]  M. Iansiti,et al.  Developing products on Internet time. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[16]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Managing New Product Definition in Highly Dynamic Environments , 1998 .

[17]  James E. Kelley,et al.  Critical-path planning and scheduling , 1899, IRE-AIEE-ACM '59 (Eastern).

[18]  Gurumurthy Kalyanaram,et al.  Deliberate Product Definition: Customizing the Product Definition Process , 1997 .

[19]  R. Cooper,et al.  Winning Businesses in Product Development: The Critical Success Factors , 1996 .

[20]  David E. Bell,et al.  Sequential Testing in Product Development , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .

[22]  T. Fujimoto,et al.  The Effect of “ Front-Loading ” Problem-Solving on Product Development Performance , 2000 .

[23]  Jan Venselaar,et al.  DESIGN RULES , 1999 .

[24]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[25]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  Developing products in half the time , 1995 .

[26]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  The Effect of 'Front-Loading' Problem-Solving on Product Development Performance , 2000 .

[27]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities , 1997 .

[28]  Reza H. Ahmadi,et al.  Managing Development Risk in Product Design Processes , 1999, Oper. Res..

[29]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  Optimal Timing of Reviews in Concurrent Design for Manufacturability , 1995 .

[30]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Managing the new product development process , 1985 .

[31]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Designing the design process , 1990 .

[32]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Software Engineering Economics , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[33]  Jr. Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  The mythical man-month (anniversary ed.) , 1995 .

[34]  D. R. Fulkerson.  A Network Flow Computation for Project Cost Curves , 1961 .

[35]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Limits to Concurrency , 1999 .

[36]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[37]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Measuring the Effectiveness of Overlapping Development Activities , 1999 .

[38]  Robert C. Leachman,et al.  A revised critical path method for networks including both overlap relationships and variable-duration activities , 1993 .

[39]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Developing Products on "Internet Time": The Anatomy of a Flexible Development Process , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Stephan Foldes,et al.  PERT and crashing revisited: Mathematical generalizations , 1990 .

[41]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach , 1991 .

[42]  Reza H. Ahmadi,et al.  Time-Cost Trade-Offs in Overlapped Product Development , 2000, Oper. Res..

[43]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Managing the integration problem in concurrent engineering , 1993 .