Efficiency assessment of urban wastewater treatment plants in China: Considering greenhouse gas emissions

Abstract Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are high-cost facilities for improving the urban water environment and facilitating resource recycle but with inevitable negative externality. To comprehensively assess urban WWTP performance, a distance function approach was configured to quantify the efficiency with capital cost and energy consumption as inputs, removals of four types of pollutants as desirable outputs, and emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) as undesirable output. Adding both direct and indirect GHG emissions into the efficiency metrics would help decision makers obtain a more profound understanding of urban WWTPs’ contribution to both aquatic and atmospheric environments. The method was applied to 1079 urban WWTPs across China adopting eight major biological technologies. The average efficiency score was 0.322, implying that GHG emissions could decrease by 32.2% if all plants worked efficiently. Eight plants were deemed the most efficient and formed a frontier of the best practices, while 12 plants were the most inefficient with distances from the frontier larger than 0.650. The parameterized distance function could be used to set a benchmark system for the performance surveillance of urban WWTPs. The integrated efficiency assessment considering multiple dimensions and statistical analysis on a large sample allowed us to reveal reasons for efficiency gaps. Statistic test results showed that plants scale, technology, and capacity of tertiary treatment were significant for explaining efficiency disparities. Large-scale plants, plants with the bioreactors or the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic processes, and plants without tertiary treatment processes tended to be more efficient, showing the advantage in co-benefiting water pollutants and GHG control.

[1]  Zhimin Huang,et al.  The performance evaluation of regional R&D investments in China: An application of DEA based on the first official China economic census data , 2011 .

[2]  Francesc Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Technical efficiency and cost analysis in wastewater treatment processes: A DEA approach , 2009 .

[3]  Pinchas Fine,et al.  Options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during wastewater treatment for agricultural use. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Weiping Chen,et al.  An overview of reclaimed water reuse in China. , 2011, Journal of environmental sciences.

[5]  Gumersindo Feijoo,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of Spanish WWTPs using the LCA + DEA method. , 2015, Water research.

[6]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Nitrous oxide emission during wastewater treatment. , 2009, Water research.

[7]  L Yerushalmi,et al.  Estimation of greenhouse gas generation in wastewater treatment plants--model development and application. , 2010, Chemosphere.

[8]  M. Eckelman,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Advanced Nutrient Removal Technologies for Wastewater Treatment. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Statistical Analysis of Global Warming Potential, Eutrophication Potential, and Sludge Production of Wastewater Treatment Plants in Japan , 2013 .

[10]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Cost modelling for wastewater treatment processes , 2011 .

[11]  Shaohua Chen,et al.  Survey of MBR market: Trends and perspectives in China ☆ , 2010 .

[12]  Richard Ashley,et al.  Performance Indicators for Wastewater Services , 2015 .

[13]  Jun-xin Liu,et al.  Characteristics of greenhouse gas emission in three full-scale wastewater treatment processes. , 2014, Journal of environmental sciences.

[14]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Valuation of environmental goods: A shadow value perspective , 2008 .

[15]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Environmental regulation, productive efficiency and cost of pollution abatement: a case study of the sugar industry in India. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  Heinz A. Preisig,et al.  Indicators for the sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment systems , 2002 .

[17]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Methane emissions from a full-scale A/A/O wastewater treatment plant. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[18]  A. Hospido,et al.  A methodology to estimate greenhouse gases emissions in Life Cycle Inventories of wastewater treatment plants , 2012 .

[19]  H Wenzel,et al.  Sustainability assessment of advanced wastewater treatment technologies. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  M Molinos-Senante,et al.  Energy efficiency in Spanish wastewater treatment plants: a non-radial DEA approach. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Economic Feasibility Study for Phosphorus Recovery Processes , 2011, AMBIO.

[22]  Russell Pittman,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons with Undesirable Outputs , 1983 .

[23]  L. Corominas,et al.  Comparison of different modeling approaches to better evaluate greenhouse gas emissions from whole wastewater treatment plants , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  F. Haghighat,et al.  Impact of process design on greenhouse gas (GHG) generation by wastewater treatment plants. , 2009, Water research.

[25]  M Molinos-Senante,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of water-reuse projects for environmental purposes: a case study for Spanish wastewater treatment plants. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  Zhiguo Yuan,et al.  Nitrous oxide generation in full-scale biological nutrient removal wastewater treatment plants. , 2010, Water research.

[27]  Junying Chu,et al.  Wastewater reuse potential analysis: implications for China's water resources management. , 2004, Water research.

[28]  Ji-Hoon Kim,et al.  Real-time remote monitoring of small-scaled biological wastewater treatment plants by a multivariate statistical process control and neural network-based software sensors , 2008 .

[29]  David Wheeler,et al.  Water pollution abatement by Chinese industry: cost estimates and policy implications , 1996 .

[30]  B. Eklund,et al.  Estimates of global greenhouse gas emissions from industrial and domestic wastewater treatment. Final report, September 1994-March 1997 , 1997 .

[31]  Jeong-dong Lee,et al.  A new approach to measuring shadow price: Reconciling engineering and economic perspectives , 2014 .

[32]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: a cost-benefit analysis. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  Albert Germain,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Water: From the pumping station to the wastewater treatment plant (9 pp) , 2007 .

[34]  Charlotte Scheutz,et al.  Plant-integrated measurement of greenhouse gas emissions from a municipal wastewater treatment plant. , 2014, Water research.

[35]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[36]  A. Zouboulis,et al.  Effect of climate change in WWTPs with a focus on MBR infrastructure , 2016 .

[37]  William L. Weber,et al.  Characteristics of a Polluting Technology: Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[38]  Helen E. Muga,et al.  Sustainability of wastewater treatment technologies. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[39]  A. Baky,et al.  Wastewater management integrated with farming –an environmental systems analysis of a Swedish country town , 2006 .

[40]  Francesc Castells,et al.  LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  Xiaodong Zhu,et al.  Estimate of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland and conventional wastewater treatment plants: A case study in China , 2011 .

[42]  L. Corominas,et al.  Including greenhouse gas emissions during benchmarking of wastewater treatment plant control strategies. , 2011, Water research.

[43]  Marcelo Resende,et al.  Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study , 2004 .

[44]  Patrick Rousseaux,et al.  An LCA of alternative wastewater sludge treatment scenarios , 2002 .

[45]  Xavier Flores-Alsina,et al.  Multiple-objective evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control alternatives. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[46]  Takashi Asano,et al.  Wastewater reclamation, recycling and reuse: past, present, and future , 1996 .

[47]  Guangming Zhang,et al.  Current state of sewage treatment in China. , 2014, Water research.

[48]  R. Färe,et al.  Theory and Application of Directional Distance Functions , 2000 .

[49]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[50]  Helena Alegre,et al.  A performance indicators system for urban wastewater treatment plants. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[51]  W. Briec,et al.  Plural forms versus franchise and company-owned systems: A DEA approach of hotel chain performance , 2009 .

[52]  William L. Weber,et al.  Shadow prices and pollution costs in U.S. agriculture , 2006 .

[53]  R. Shepherd Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[54]  Y. Chi,et al.  Combined Life Cycle Environmental and Exergetic Assessment of Four Typical Sewage Sludge Treatment Techniques in China , 2014 .

[55]  Subhankar Karmakar,et al.  Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: a scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[56]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Comparing the efficiency of wastewater treatment technologies through a DEA metafrontier model , 2011 .

[57]  T. Sueyoshi,et al.  A use of a nonparametric statistic for DEA frontier shift: the Kruskal and Wallis rank test , 2001 .