Making Science Accessible to All: Results of a Design Experiment in Inclusive Classrooms

Recent science reform documents call for students to develop robust understandings of scientific concepts and reasoning through inquiry-based instruction. The challenge of this goal is increased in heterogeneous inclusive classroom settings with students identified as having learning disabilities and emotional impairments. This article describes a design experiment conducted over two school years in which we investigated the experiences and outcomes for special needs students in guided inquiry science instruction in upper-elementary grade classrooms (n = 4). Phase 1 (′97-′98) of the design experiment utilized qualitative and quantitative data to construct case studies of individual learners with special needs. Patterns across the cases informed the identification of advanced instructional strategies hypothesized to support special needs students relative to language/cognition, print literacy, attention, and social relations challenges. In Phase 2 (′98-′99), we studied learning outcomes from instruction including the advanced strategies (same teachers, topics as Phase 1). Our findings indicate that in Phase 2 (with the advanced strategies) all students demonstrated significant learning gains over Phase 1 and that special needs and low-achieving students in three of four classes showed changes in understanding comparable to those of normally achieving students. We conclude by identifying implications of these findings for the roles of general and special educators.

[1]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[2]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided discovery in a community of learners. , 1994 .

[3]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[4]  J. Meece,et al.  Task Factors, Teacher Behavior, and Students' Involvement and Use of Learning Strategies in Science , 1988, The Elementary School Journal.

[5]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[6]  Carol Sue Englert.  Educational Innovations: Achieving Curricular Change through Collaboration. , 1993 .

[7]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  The Learning Environment as a Site of Science Education Reform. , 1995 .

[8]  B. Rogoff.  Cognition as a collaborative process. , 1998 .

[9]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[10]  J. Woodward,et al.  Science Instruction at the Secondary Level: Implications for Students with Learning Disabilities , 1991, Journal of learning disabilities.

[11]  J. Morse,et al.  Reporting qualitative research , 1996 .

[12]  K. McGilly,et al.  Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. , 1994 .

[13]  G. W. Ford,et al.  The structure of knowledge and the curriculum , 1964 .

[14]  Bridget Dalton,et al.  Supported Inquiry Science , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[15]  N. Zigmond,et al.  An Exploration of the Meaning and Practice of Special Education in the Context of Full Inclusion of Students with Learning Disabilities , 1995 .

[16]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community , 1998 .

[17]  Russell Gersten,et al.  Real World Use of Scientific Concepts: Integrating Situated Cognition with Explicit Instruction , 1998 .

[18]  F J Schiesser,et al.  How do you think? , 1975, Pennsylvania dental journal.

[19]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Investigating the Engagement and Learning of Students With Learning Disabilities in Guided Inquiry Science Teaching. , 2000, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[20]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  The Construction of Scientific Knowledge by Students with Mild Disabilities , 1994 .

[21]  Valerie J. Janesick.  The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. , 1994 .

[22]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[23]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Observations of Students with Learning Disabilities in General Education Classrooms , 1993 .

[24]  J. Lagowski.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[25]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[26]  R. Driver,et al.  Children's Ideas in Science , 1985 .

[27]  Bridget Dalton,et al.  Revealing Competence: Fourth-Grade Students with and without Learning Disabilities Show What They Know on Paper-and-Pencil and Hands-On Performance Assessments. , 1995 .

[28]  Gordon Wells,et al.  Language and the Inquiry-Oriented Curriculum , 1995 .

[29]  J. Lemke.  Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[30]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Science for Students With Disabilities , 1992 .

[31]  V. John-Steiner,et al.  Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework , 1996 .

[32]  J. Carlisle,et al.  Evaluation of Academic Capabilities in Science by Students with and without Learning Disabilities and their Teachers , 1996 .

[33]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .