Does massive funding support of researchers work?: Evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Debora Shaw,et al. A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources , 2008, Scientometrics.
[2] L. Butler,et al. Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts , 2003 .
[3] Claire Polster. A Break from the Past: Impacts and Implications of the Canada Foundation for Innovation and the Canada Research Chairs Initiatives* , 2008 .
[4] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. On the Opportunities and Limitations of the H-index , 2006 .
[5] D F Horrobin,et al. The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. , 1990, JAMA.
[6] Joel Mokyr,et al. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .
[7] Ben R. Martin,et al. The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research , 1996, Scientometrics.
[8] Lokman I. Meho,et al. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar , 2007 .
[9] Sebastian Spaeth,et al. How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation , 2013 .
[10] P. Howitt,et al. Testing Creative Destruction in an Opening Economy , 2013 .
[11] James Testa,et al. The Thomson Scientific journal selection process. , 2006, International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology.
[12] Péter Jacsó,et al. Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..
[13] Jacques Mairesse,et al. Research Investment, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level , 1998 .
[14] Juan E. Iglesias,et al. Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields , 2006, Scientometrics.
[15] Thomas E. Nisonger,et al. Citation Autobiography: An Investigation of ISI Database Coverage in Determining Author Citedness , 2004 .
[16] A. Salter,et al. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .
[17] N. Mclaughlin,et al. The Canada Research Chairs Program and Social Science Reward Structures , 2008 .
[18] Constance E. Helfat,et al. INNOVATION OBJECTIVES, KNOWLEDGE SOURCES, AND THE BENEFITS OF BREADTH , 2010 .
[19] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? , 2005, Scientometrics.
[20] Anne-Wil Harzing,et al. Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis , 2008 .
[21] Lutz Bornmann,et al. What do we know about the h index? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[22] Lokman I. Meho,et al. A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar , 2006, ArXiv.
[23] D. Mowery,et al. Technology and the pursuit of economic growth , 1991 .
[24] J. W. Fedderke. The objectivity of national research foundation peer review in South Africa assessed against bibliometric indexes , 2013, Scientometrics.
[25] Mike Thelwall,et al. Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines , 2008, Scientometrics.
[26] M. Thelwall,et al. Google Scholar citations and Google Web-URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis , 2007 .
[27] Ed J. Rinia,et al. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF A SET OF BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS AND CENTRAL PEER REVIEW CRITERIA. EVALUATION OF CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS IN THE NETHERLANDS , 1998 .
[28] Andreas Thor,et al. Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry - Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts , 2009, J. Informetrics.
[29] Péter Jacsó,et al. Dubious hit counts and cuckoo's eggs , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..
[30] Gustavo Manso,et al. Is Pay-for-Performance Detrimental to Innovation? , 2012 .
[31] Reinhilde Veugelers,et al. In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..
[32] L. Bornmann,et al. Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods , 2010 .
[33] J. C. Korevaar,et al. Validation of bibliometric indicators in the field of mathematics , 1996, Scientometrics.
[34] Leo Egghe,et al. An informetric model for the Hirsch-index , 2006, Scientometrics.
[35] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Scientific peer review , 2011, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[36] A. Kulkarni,et al. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. , 2009, JAMA.
[37] Constance E. Helfat,et al. Location, Decentralization, and Knowledge Sources for Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..
[38] D. Hicks. Performance-based university research funding systems , 2012 .
[39] Jeroen Bosman,et al. Scopus reviewed and compared: the coverage and functionality of the citation database Scopus, including comparisons with Web of Science and Google Scholar , 2006 .
[40] Haiyang Li,et al. Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China , 2001 .
[41] Richard R. Nelson,et al. The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership: The Postwar Era in Historical Perspective , 1992 .
[42] J. E. Hirsch,et al. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
[43] Jacques Mairesse,et al. Accounting for Innovation and Measuring Innovativeness: An Illustrative Framework and an Application , 2002 .
[44] Christoph Grimpe,et al. Extramural research grants and scientists’ funding strategies: Beggars cannot be choosers? , 2012 .
[45] Péter Jacsó,et al. Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..
[46] Matthew E Falagas,et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[47] Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al. Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods , 2005, Scientometrics.
[48] Bruno Crépon,et al. Research, Innovation, and Productivity: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level , 1998 .
[49] Yang Li-ying,et al. Bibliometrical Analysis of Paper's Co-occurrence in Main International Institutions&mdash|A Case Study in Chemical Research , 2006 .
[50] J. V. Reenen. Does Competition Raise Productivity Through Improving Management Quality , 2011 .
[51] Anthony F. J. van Raan. Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups , 2013, Scientometrics.
[52] Charles Oppenheim,et al. The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology , 1997, J. Documentation.
[53] Nathan Rosenberg,et al. Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History , 1994 .
[54] Anne-Wil Harzing,et al. REFLECTIONS ON THE H-INDEX , 2012 .
[55] C. Rammer,et al. Resource allocation strategy for innovation portfolio management , 2014 .
[56] Philippe Aghion,et al. Innovation and Institutional Ownership , 2013 .
[57] D. Braun,et al. The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science , 1998 .
[58] Henry L. Roediger,et al. The h Index in Science: A New Measure of Scholarly Contribution , 2006 .
[59] Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al. Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .
[60] W. D. Hall,et al. A cautionary bibliometric tale of two cities , 2010, Scientometrics.
[61] D. Aksnes,et al. Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university , 2004 .
[62] Jan Fagerberg,et al. Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates , 1994 .
[63] Tammy L. Madsen,et al. Unbundling competitive heterogeneity: incentive structures and capability influences on technological innovation , 2009 .
[64] Lokman I. Meho,et al. Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..