Behaving Ourselves: How Behavior Change Insights Are Being Applied to Energy Efficiency Programs

While there is growing interest in applying behavior change to the energy efficiency context, there is often a great deal of uncertainty about how behavior strategies are incorporated, or could be incorporated, into efficiency programs and what tools may be useful in this work. The Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE) membership recognized the potential benefit of gathering information on behavior change in the context of ratepayer-funded energy efficiency. To this end, CEE and its members have developed an overview of behavior insights from across the social sciences that could be incorporated into efficiency efforts, with examples of programs applying those insights. A goal of this effort was to facilitate information exchange between program administrators and provide the necessary resources to those incorporating behavior approaches into their programs. This paper will describe a wide variety of behavior insights potentially applicable to the energy efficiency program context, provide examples of efficiency programs that have already begun to apply these insights, and explore some untapped opportunities to achieve energy savings through behavior change. CEE members have already incorporated numerous behavior insights into their programs, such as social norms, feedback, public commitment, and goal setting. Yet other key insights, such as self-efficacy, cognitive dissonance, and loss aversion, have gone largely underutilized in energy efficiency up to this point. Future participation in and effectiveness of energy efficiency efforts would likely benefit from the application of these additional insights.

[1]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  Perception and expectation of climate change: Precondition for economic and technological adaptation. , 1997 .

[2]  R. Cialdini Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion , 1993 .

[3]  John Thøgersen,et al.  A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior , 2004 .

[4]  R. Katzev,et al.  A social-psychological analysis of residential electricity consumption: the impact of minimal justification techniques , 1983 .

[5]  D. Ariely Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions , 2008 .

[6]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[7]  R. Katzev,et al.  Promoting energy conservation: An analysis of behavioral research , 1987 .

[8]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use , 2007, Renewable Energy.

[9]  L. J. Becker Joint effect of feedback and goal setting on performance: a field study of residential energy conservation , 1978 .

[10]  Pallak,et al.  Commitment and energy conservation , 1980 .

[11]  R. Katzev,et al.  Comparing the Effects of Monetary Incentives and Foot‐in‐the‐Door Strategies in Promoting Residential Electricity Conservation , 1984 .

[12]  Alfred Lee Baldwin,et al.  Theories of Child Development , 1967 .

[13]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance: A Current Perspective1 , 1969 .

[14]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Descriptive Social Norms as Underappreciated Sources of Social Control , 2007 .

[15]  R. Thaler,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2008 .

[16]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Increasing Community Recycling with Persuasive Communication and Public Commitment , 1986 .

[17]  C. Vlek,et al.  A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation , 2005 .

[18]  V. Rich Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[19]  D. Bem Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[20]  R. Cialdini Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[21]  H. Simon Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[22]  M. Pallak,et al.  Commitment and Voluntary Energy Conservation , 1976 .

[23]  M. Aurélius Fostering Sustainable Behavior , 2011 .

[24]  C. Vlek,et al.  The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. , 2007 .

[25]  Ahmed M. Hussen Principles of environmental economics : economics, ecology and public policy , 2000 .

[26]  Sebastian Bamberg,et al.  EFFECTS OF IMPLEMENTATION INTENTIONS ON THE ACTUAL PERFORMANCE OF NEW ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY BEHAVIOURS — RESULTS OF TWO FIELD EXPERIMENTS , 2002 .

[27]  Aroldo Rodrígues,et al.  The theory of cognitive dissonance: a current perspective , 1970 .