EMG-Torque correction on Human Upper extremity using Evolutionary Computation

There have been many studies indicating that control system of rehabilitative robot plays an important role in determining the outcome of the therapy process. Existing works have done the prediction of feedback signal in the controller based on the kinematics parameters and EMG readings of upper limb's skeletal system. Kinematics and kinetics based control signal system is developed by reading the output of the sensors such as position sensor, orientation sensor and F/T (Force/Torque) sensor and there readings are to be compared with the preceding measurement to decide on the amount of assistive force. There are also other works that incorporated the kinematics parameters to calculate the kinetics parameters via formulation and pre-defined assumptions. Nevertheless, these types of control signals analyze the movement of the upper limb only based on the movement of the upper joints. They do not anticipate the possibility of muscle plasticity. The focus of the paper is to make use of the kinematics parameters and EMG readings of skeletal system to predict the individual torque of upper extremity's joints. The surface EMG signals are fed into different mathematical models so that these data can be trained through Genetic Algorithm (GA) to find the best correlation between EMG signals and torques acting on the upper limb's joints. The estimated torque attained from the mathematical models is called simulated output. The simulated output will then be compared with the actual individual joint which is calculated based on the real time kinematics parameters of the upper movement of the skeleton when the muscle cells are activated. The findings from this contribution are extended into the development of the active control signal based controller for rehabilitation robot.

[1]  Subramaniam Parasuraman,et al.  Investigation on Upper Limb’s Muscle Utilizing EMG Signal , 2012, ICRA 2012.

[2]  R Merletti,et al.  Surface EMG: the issue of electrode location. , 2009, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[3]  S Siegler,et al.  Effect of myoelectric signal processing on the relationship between muscle force and processed EMG. , 1985, American journal of physical medicine.

[4]  D Chaffin,et al.  High-pass filtering to remove electrocardiographic interference from torso EMG recordings. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Travis W. Beck,et al.  The effects of innervation zone on electromyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during incremental cycle ergometry , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  R. Merletti,et al.  Median frequency of the myoelectric signal , 1984, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[7]  B. Prabhakaran,et al.  Integration of Motion Capture and EMG data for Classifying the Human Motions , 2007, 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop.

[8]  R.Fff. Weir,et al.  A heuristic fuzzy logic approach to EMG pattern recognition for multifunctional prosthesis control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  S. Parasuraman,et al.  AI Techniques to Estimate Muscle Force and Joint Torque for Upper Extremity , 2011 .

[10]  S. Parasuraman,et al.  Estimation of muscle forces and joint torque from EMG using SA process , 2010, 2010 IEEE EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES).

[11]  Mikhail Kuznetsov,et al.  Filtering the surface EMG signal: Movement artifact and baseline noise contamination. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  R. N. Scott,et al.  Myoelectric signal characteristics from muscles in residual upper limbs , 1994 .

[13]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[14]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Myoelectric signal conduction velocity and spectral parameters: influence of force and time. , 1985, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  Richard J. Schmidt,et al.  The effects of electrode orientation on electromyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during cycle ergometry , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Stephen H. M. Brown,et al.  Less is more: high pass filtering, to remove up to 99% of the surface EMG signal power, improves EMG-based biceps brachii muscle force estimates. , 2004, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[17]  Subramaniam Parasuraman,et al.  Robot Assisted Stroke Rehabilitation: Joint Torque/Force Conversion from EMG Using SA Process , 2010, ICIRA.

[18]  J. Petrofsky,et al.  Muscle temperature and EMG amplitude and frequency during isometric exercise. , 2005, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[19]  G. Ng,et al.  Surface electrode placement affects the EMG recordings of the quadriceps muscles , 2006 .

[20]  Denis Gravel,et al.  The influence of an increase in the level of force on the EMG power spectrum of elbow extensors , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[21]  R.Fff. Weir,et al.  A multifunction prosthesis controller based on fuzzy-logic techniques , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).