Direct comparison of additively manufactured porous titanium and tantalum implants towards in vivo osseointegration.

Material properties of implants such as volume porosity and nanoscale surface modification have been shown to enhance cell-material interactions in vitro and osseointegration in vivo. Porous tantalum (Ta) and titanium (Ti) coatings are widely used for non-cemented implants, which are fabricated using different processing routes. In recent years, some of those implants are being manufactured using additive manufacturing. However, limited knowledge is available on direct comparison of additively manufactured porous Ta and Ti structures towards early stage osseointegration. In this study, we have fabricated porous Ta and Ti6Al4V (Ti64) implants using laser engineered net shaping (LENS™) with similar volume fraction porosity to compare the influence of surface characteristics and material chemistry on in vivo response using a rat distal femur model for 5 and 12 weeks. We have also assessed whether surface modification on Ti64 can elicit similar in vivo response as porous Ta in a rat distal femur model for 5 and 12 weeks. The harvested implants were histologically analyzed for osteoid surface per bone surface. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) was done to assess the bone-implant interface. The results presented here indicate comparable performance of porous Ta and surface modified porous Ti64 implants towards early stage osseointegration at 5 weeks post implantation through seamless bone-material interlocking. However, a continued and extended efficacy of porous Ta is found in terms of higher osteoid formation at 12 weeks post-surgery.

[1]  Sungho Jin,et al.  Improved bone-forming functionality on diameter-controlled TiO(2) nanotube surface. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[2]  Mitsuo Niinomi,et al.  Mechanical biocompatibilities of titanium alloys for biomedical applications. , 2008, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[3]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  Additively manufactured porous tantalum implants. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[4]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  L. Bi,et al.  Evaluation of the osteogenesis and osseointegration of titanium alloys coated with graphene: an in vivo study , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Todd Palmer,et al.  Heat transfer and fluid flow during keyhole mode laser welding of tantalum, Ti–6Al–4V, 304L stainless steel and vanadium , 2007 .

[7]  Sompop Bencharit,et al.  Development and applications of porous tantalum trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implants. , 2014, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[8]  B. Boyan,et al.  The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone. , 1996, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[9]  Michiel Mulier,et al.  Bone regeneration performance of surface-treated porous titanium. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[10]  Vamsi Krishna Balla,et al.  Porous tantalum structures for bone implants: fabrication, mechanical and in vitro biological properties. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  H. M. Kim,et al.  Bonding of alkali- and heat-treated tantalum implants to bone. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  Sheikh A. Akbar,et al.  Review of titania nanotubes: Fabrication and cellular response , 2012 .

[13]  Dongxu Ke,et al.  Additive manufacturing of biomaterials. , 2018, Progress in materials science.

[14]  Emeka Nkenke,et al.  In vivo performance of selective electron beam-melted Ti-6Al-4V structures. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[15]  C. Vanhove,et al.  Utilizing micro-computed tomography to evaluate bone structure surrounding dental implants: a comparison with histomorphometry. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[16]  A. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Laser processing of bulk Al–12Si alloy: influence of microstructure on thermal properties , 2011 .

[17]  J. Black Biological performance of tantalum. , 1994, Clinical materials.

[18]  G. Gronowicz,et al.  Porous tantalum stimulates the proliferation and osteogenesis of osteoblasts from elderly female patients , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  A. Yokoyama,et al.  Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of refractory metal implants, titanium, hafnium, niobium, tantalum and rhenium. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[20]  H. Cao,et al.  A comparison of micro-CT and histomorphometry for evaluation of osseointegration of PEO-coated titanium implants in a rat model , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Tejal A Desai,et al.  Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[22]  Tomiharu Matsushita,et al.  Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment. , 2016, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[23]  A. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  In Vivo Response of Laser Processed Porous Titanium Implants for Load-Bearing Implants , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  A. Simchi,et al.  Direct laser sintering of iron–graphite powder mixture , 2004 .

[25]  B Vamsi Krishna,et al.  Processing and biocompatibility evaluation of laser processed porous titanium. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[26]  Lars Rasmusson,et al.  Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[27]  Vamsi Krishna Balla,et al.  Direct laser processing of a tantalum coating on titanium for bone replacement structures. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[28]  S. Bencharit,et al.  Immediate placement of a porous-tantalum, trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implant with demineralized bone matrix into a socket with deficient buccal bone: a clinical report. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[29]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  A. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Influence of porosity on mechanical properties and in vivo response of Ti6Al4V implants. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[31]  D. Howie,et al.  The proliferation and phenotypic expression of human osteoblasts on tantalum metal. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[32]  Vamsi Krishna Balla,et al.  Tantalum—A bioactive metal for implants , 2010 .

[33]  S. Gnedenkov,et al.  In vivo study of osteogenerating properties of calcium-phosphate coating on titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. , 2017, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[34]  M. Foss,et al.  Morphology, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells cultured on titanium, tantalum, and chromium surfaces. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[35]  A. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  TiO2 nanotubes on Ti: Influence of nanoscale morphology on bone cell-materials interaction. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[36]  Y. Missirlis,et al.  Biomaterials: A Tantalus Experience , 2010 .

[37]  Vamsi Krishna Balla,et al.  Surface modification of laser-processed porous titanium for load-bearing implants , 2008 .

[38]  Joshua J Jacobs,et al.  Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. , 2006, Biomaterials.