Complexity and learning behaviors in product innovation

Successful product innovation and the ability of companies to continuously improve their innovation processes are rapidly becoming essential requirements for competitive advantage and long-term growth in both manufacturing and service industries. It is now recognized that companies must develop innovation capabilities across all stages of the product development, manufacture, and distribution cycle. These Continuous Product Innovation (CPI) capabilities are closely associated with a company’s knowledge management systems and processes. Companies must develop mechanisms to continuously improve these capabilities over time. Using results of an international survey on CPI practices, sets of companies are identified by similarities in specific contingencies related to their complexity of product, process, technological, and customer interface. Differences between the learning behaviors found present in the company groups and in the levers used to develop and support these behaviors are identified and discussed. This paper also discusses appropriate mechanisms for firms with similar complexities, and some approaches they can use to improve their organizational learning and product innovation.

[1]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[2]  S. Sanderson,et al.  Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman , 1995 .

[3]  Eliat Aram,et al.  Educating Prospective Managers in the Complexity of Organizational Life , 1999 .

[4]  Don E. Kash,et al.  The Complexity Challenge: Technological Innovation for the 21st Century , 1999 .

[5]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The product family and the dynamics of core capability , 1992 .

[6]  John Bessant,et al.  Rediscovering continuous improvement , 1994 .

[7]  Hiroyuki Itami.  Mobilizing invisible assets , 1987 .

[8]  David J. Collis,et al.  Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s , 1999 .

[9]  Kate D. Abel,et al.  Practices that Support Team Learning and Their Impact on Speed to Market and New Product Success , 1999 .

[10]  Riitta Smeds,et al.  Continuous learning in global product development: a cross-cultural comparison , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[11]  Mariano Corso,et al.  Continuous improvement and inter-project learning in new product development , 1997 .

[12]  A. Arora,et al.  The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of , 1994 .

[13]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[14]  Mariano Corso,et al.  A multi-project management framework for new product development , 1994 .

[15]  Steve McKenna,et al.  Learning through Complexity , 1999 .

[16]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[17]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[18]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[19]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Managing the new product development process , 1985 .

[20]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Uneasy alliance: Managing the productivity-technology dilemma , 1985 .

[21]  Roger E. Bohn,et al.  Chapter 17 – Measuring and Managing Technological Knowledge , 1998 .

[22]  Mariano Corso,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Continuous Product Innovation , 1998 .