Impact of social-aware forwarding on traffic distribution in social opportunistic networks

Social opportunistic networks (SONs) are delay-tolerant MANETs that exploit human mobility to enable message delivery in the networks. Humans tend to move in a way that is influenced by their social relations. Knowledge of social relationships therefore can be exploited to build social-aware routing protocols. These algorithms typically favour higher (social) ranking nodes as better relays for message transfers. The combination of this forwarding heuristic and the social network structure, which exhibits a non-uniform connectivity distribution with the existence of a few highly-connected nodes, leads the routing algorithm to direct most of the traffic through these hub nodes. Unbalanced traffic distribution therefore results in the network. This paper presents an analysis of traffic distribution in SONs when social-aware routing protocols are applied in the networks. Initially, we survey state-of-the-art social-aware routing protocols. We next investigate the topology characteristics of real-life SONs. Furthermore, we apply three forwarding strategies on these networks, categorising these strategies into social-aware forwarding and social-oblivious forwarding. The social-aware forwarding strategies consider node ranking when choosing traffic relays and the node ranking here is measured by degree and betweeness centralities. The social-oblivious forwarding, however, disregards node ranking on the forwarding decision and selects a relay node randomly. We show that the social-aware forwarding strategies result in very poor traffic distribution fairness, where a few (hub) nodes process a large fraction of the network traffic. Finally, we discuss the strategies for improving traffic distribution fairness in SONs.

[1]  Bambang Soelistijanto,et al.  Traffic distribution and network capacity analysis in social opportunistic networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[2]  Phillip Bonacich,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Sociology , 2012 .

[3]  Serge Fdida,et al.  SIMPS: Using Sociology for Personal Mobility , 2006, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[4]  Zhensheng Zhang,et al.  Routing in intermittently connected mobile ad hoc networks and delay tolerant networks: overview and challenges , 2006, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[5]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[6]  Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos,et al.  A complex network analysis of human mobility , 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[7]  Christophe Diot,et al.  Social Pocket Switched Networks , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM Workshops 2009.

[8]  Flavio Fabbri,et al.  A Sociability-Based Routing Scheme for Delay-Tolerant Networks , 2011, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[9]  Mostafa H. Ammar,et al.  PeopleRank: Social Opportunistic Forwarding , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[10]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Reality mining: sensing complex social systems , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[11]  Mads Haahr,et al.  Social Network Analysis for Information Flow in Disconnected Delay-Tolerant MANETs , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[12]  Pan Hui,et al.  BUBBLE Rap: Social-Based Forwarding in Delay-Tolerant Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[13]  Bambang Soelistijanto,et al.  Transfer Reliability and Congestion Control Strategies in Opportunistic Networks: A Survey , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[14]  Pablo Rodriguez,et al.  Fair Routing in Delay Tolerant Networks , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[15]  Anders Lindgren,et al.  Probabilistic Routing in Intermittently Connected Networks , 2004, SAPIR.

[16]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  CAR: Context-Aware Adaptive Routing for Delay-Tolerant Mobile Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[17]  Pan Hui,et al.  Distinct types of hubs in human dynamic networks , 2008, SocialNets '08.

[18]  Jörg Ott,et al.  The ONE simulator for DTN protocol evaluation , 2009, SIMUTools 2009.

[19]  Marco Conti,et al.  Multihop Ad Hoc Networking: The Reality , 2007, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[20]  Yong Wang,et al.  Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: design tradeoffs and early experiences with ZebraNet , 2002, ASPLOS X.

[21]  Fabio Panzieri,et al.  Scale-free opportunistic networks: Is it possible? , 2011, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.

[22]  Joan Triay,et al.  From Delay-Tolerant Networks to Vehicular Delay-Tolerant Networks , 2012, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.