Rotation to a Partially Specified Target Matrix in Exploratory Factor Analysis: How Many Targets?

The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of the number of targets specified on the quality of exploratory factor analysis solutions with a complex underlying structure and incomplete substantive measurement theory. Three Monte Carlo studies were performed based on the ratio of the number of observed variables to the number of underlying factors. Within each study, communality, sample size, and the number of targets were manipulated. Outcomes included a measure of congruence and a measure of variability with regard to the rotated pattern matrix. The magnitude of the main effect for the influence of the number of targets on congruence and variability ranged from moderate to large. The magnitude of the interaction between the number of targets and level of communality ranged from small to moderate with regard to congruence and variability. Consistent with theoretical expectations, the minimum number of targets to specify to be reasonably assured of obtaining an accurate solution varied across study conditions.

[1]  S J Henly,et al.  Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size: a clarification. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Paul Horst,et al.  A non-graphical method for transforming an arbitrary factor matrix into a simple structure factor matrix , 1941 .

[3]  Michael W. Browne,et al.  OBLIQUE ROTATION TO A PARTIALLY SPECIFIED TARGET , 1972 .

[4]  Robert C. MacCallum,et al.  Representing sources of error in the common-factor model: Implications for theory and practice. , 1991 .

[5]  R. C. Durfee,et al.  MULTIPLE FACTOR ANALYSIS. , 1967 .

[6]  W. Velicer,et al.  Affects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. , 1998 .

[7]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  TEACHER'S CORNER: Examining Identification Issues in Factor Analysis , 2006 .

[8]  J. Algina.  A note on identification in the oblique and orthogonal factor analysis models , 1980 .

[9]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Roger E. Millsap.  When Trivial Constraints Are Not Trivial: The Choice of Uniqueness Constraints in Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 2001 .

[11]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[12]  S. Mulaik.  Foundations of Factor Analysis , 1975 .

[13]  Yasuo Amemiya,et al.  Factor Analysis at 100:Historical Developments and Future Directions , 2003, Multivariate behavioral research.

[14]  B. Muthén,et al.  Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling , 2009 .

[15]  S. Mulaik,et al.  Foundations of Factor Analysis , 1975 .

[16]  Nicholas D. Myers,et al.  Coaching efficacy and exploratory structural equation modeling: a substantive-methodological synergy. , 2011, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[17]  Robert C MacCallum,et al.  2001 Presidential Address: Working with Imperfect Models , 2003, Multivariate behavioral research.

[18]  A. E. Maxwell,et al.  FACTOR TRANSFORMATION METHODS , 1964 .

[19]  R. Jennrich,et al.  Rotation for simple loadings , 1966, Psychometrika.

[20]  R. Henson,et al.  Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research , 2006 .

[21]  R. Purc-Stephenson,et al.  Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[22]  D Kaplan,et al.  The Impact of Specification Error on the Estimation, Testing, and Improvement of Structural Equation Models. , 1988, Multivariate behavioral research.

[23]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, Integrating Cfa and Efa: Application to Students' Evaluations of University Teaching , 2022 .

[24]  G. Gruvaeus,et al.  A general approach to procrustes pattern rotation , 1970 .

[25]  Ledyard R Tucker,et al.  The distribution of chance congruence coefficients from simulated data , 1975 .

[26]  Christine DiStefano,et al.  Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Construct Validation: An Empirical Review , 2005 .

[27]  R. Cudeck,et al.  Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size: a clarification. , 1991 .

[28]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[29]  P. Gagné,et al.  Measurement Model Quality, Sample Size, and Solution Propriety in Confirmatory Factor Models , 2006, Multivariate behavioral research.

[30]  Daniel A Sass,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Multivariate Behavioral Research a Comparative Investigation of Rotation Criteria within Exploratory Factor Analysis , 2022 .

[31]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Sample size in factor analysis. , 1999 .

[32]  B. Price.  A First Course in Factor Analysis , 1993 .

[33]  B. Everitt,et al.  Multivariate Exploratory Data Analysis: A Perspective on Exploratory Factor Analysis. , 1988 .

[34]  M. Browne.  An Overview of Analytic Rotation in Exploratory Factor Analysis , 2001 .

[35]  Ledyard R. Tucker,et al.  A semi-analytical method of factorial rotation to simple structure , 1944 .

[36]  Michael W. Browne,et al.  ORTHOGONAL ROTATION TO A PARTIALLY SPECIFIED TARGET , 1972 .

[37]  L. Tucker,et al.  Evaluation of factor analytic research procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices , 1969 .