Evolving neural networks with genetic algorithms to study the string landscape

A bstractWe study possible applications of artificial neural networks to examine the string landscape. Since the field of application is rather versatile, we propose to dynamically evolve these networks via genetic algorithms. This means that we start from basic building blocks and combine them such that the neural network performs best for the application we are interested in. We study three areas in which neural networks can be applied: to classify models according to a fixed set of (physically) appealing features, to find a concrete realization for a computation for which the precise algorithm is known in principle but very tedious to actually implement, and to predict or approximate the outcome of some involved mathematical computation which performs too inefficient to apply it, e.g. in model scans within the string landscape. We present simple examples that arise in string phenomenology for all three types of problems and discuss how they can be addressed by evolving neural networks from genetic algorithms.

[1]  C. Lütken,et al.  Complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds , 1988 .

[2]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1989, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[3]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1992, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[4]  Maximilian Kreuzer,et al.  Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four dimensions , 2000, hep-th/0002240.

[5]  Shamit Kachru,et al.  De Sitter vacua in string theory , 2003, hep-th/0301240.

[6]  The statistics of string/M theory vacua , 2003, hep-th/0303194.

[7]  D. Grellscheid,et al.  Genetic algorithms and experimental discrimination of SUSY models , 2004 .

[8]  A new method for finding vacua in string phenomenology , 2007, hep-th/0703249.

[9]  Heterotic Compactification, An Algorithmic Approach , 2007, hep-th/0702210.

[10]  Yang-Hui He,et al.  Monad bundles in heterotic string compactifications , 2008, 0805.2875.

[11]  Yang-Hui He,et al.  Exploring positive monad bundles and a new heterotic standard model , 2009, 0911.1569.

[12]  On the classification of brane tilings , 2009, 0909.2868.

[13]  Yang-Hui He,et al.  Heterotic models from vector bundles on toric Calabi-Yau manifolds , 2009, 0911.0865.

[14]  W. Taylor,et al.  Toric bases for 6D F‐theory models , 2012, 1204.0283.

[15]  W. Taylor,et al.  Classifying bases for 6D F-theory models , 2012, 1201.1943.

[16]  B. Ovrut,et al.  Vacuum varieties, holomorphic bundles and complex structure stabilization in heterotic theories , 2013, 1304.2704.

[17]  A. Constantin,et al.  A Comprehensive Scan for Heterotic SU(5) GUT models , 2013, 1307.4787.

[18]  J. Gray,et al.  All complete intersection Calabi-Yau four-folds , 2013, 1303.1832.

[19]  A. Constantin,et al.  The moduli space of heterotic line bundle models: a case study for the tetra-quadric , 2013, 1311.1941.

[20]  J. Rizos,et al.  Genetic algorithms and the search for viable string vacua , 2014, 1404.7359.

[21]  Fabian Ruehle,et al.  Calabi-Yau compactifications of non-supersymmetric heterotic string theory , 2015, 1507.06147.

[22]  Fabian Ruehle,et al.  Infinite number of MSSMs from heterotic line bundles , 2015, 1506.00879.

[23]  H. Nilles,et al.  Geography of fields in extra dimensions: String theory lessons for particle physics , 2014, 1403.1597.

[24]  Rak-Kyeong Seong,et al.  Brane brick models in the mirror , 2016, 1609.01723.

[25]  Seung-Joo Lee,et al.  A new construction of Calabi–Yau manifolds: Generalized CICYs , 2015, 1507.03235.

[26]  Algorithmic universality in F-theory compactifications , 2017, 1706.02299.

[27]  Yang-Hui He,et al.  Deep-Learning the Landscape , 2017, 1706.02714.

[28]  Cost of seven-brane gauge symmetry in a quadrillion F-theory compactifications , 2016, 1610.08864.