Automated Formation of Peer-learning Cohorts Using Computer-based Assessment Data: A Double-blind Study within a Software Engineering Course

An approach is developed to integrate the complementary benefits of digitized assessments and peer learning. The research hypothesis is that each student’s assessment data at the fine-grained resolution of correct/incorrect question choice selections can be utilized to partition learners into effective peer learning cohorts. A low overhead approach is explored along with its associated tool, referred to as Automated Peer Learning Cohorts (Auto-PLC). The objective of Auto-PLC is to increase scalability to deliver peer-based learning. First, digitized formative assessments are delivered in a computer-based testing center. This enables automated grading, which frees-up the instructor’s and teaching assistants’ workloads to become reallocated to recitation sessions for higher-gain learning activities, such as peer-based remediation sessions. Second, within the recitations held following each formative quiz, students are afforded an opportunity to complete a remedial assignment. Auto-graded results of formative assessment submissions undergo AutoPLC’s statistical clustering routines using Excel macros and Python scripts to partition the class into four-person peer learning cohorts having mutually-complementary knowledge gaps and skill efficacies. Within each peer learning cohort, students solve together an assigned remedial problem during the recitation session. Thus, students who have already acquired a particular skill become paired together with students who are still acquiring that same skill, and vice versa. This also aids scalability to large enrollments within Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and Computer Science (CS) courses by maximizing opportunities for students to teach each other the material which they still need to learn. The motivation, design, and outcomes for Auto-PLC are presented within the required undergraduate course COP4331: Processes for Object-Oriented Software Development at a large state university. To evaluate effectiveness, a double-blind IRB-approved study has been conducted in COP4331 involving 206 students. All enrolled participated identically, except for their assignment to either randomly-formed or intelligently-clustered remediation groups. At the end of the semester, all students completed an identical Final Exam to provide a basis by which to compare their relative achievements. The data collected expounds upon the details of AutoPLC’s impact towards achievement on a topic-specific basis. Additionally, learners’ perceptions of digitized assessments and participation in recitation-based peer learning cohorts are discussed.

[1]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Timing of Feedback and Verbal Learning , 1988 .

[2]  William A. Stock,et al.  The Effects of Feedback Timing on Learning Facts: The Role of Response Confidence , 1994 .

[3]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[4]  G. Brosvic,et al.  Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique Promotes Learning and Corrects Inaccurate first Responses , 2002 .

[5]  Katherine Deibel,et al.  Team formation methods for increasing interaction during in-class group work , 2005, ITiCSE '05.

[6]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  Scaffolding vs. Hints in the Assistment System , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[7]  K. Koedinger,et al.  Exploring the Assistance Dilemma in Experiments with Cognitive Tutors , 2007 .

[8]  L. Katehi,et al.  Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. , 2009 .

[9]  John L. Schmalzel,et al.  Creating an Agile ECE Learning Environment Through Engineering Clinics , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[10]  Nathan J. Patterson,et al.  Games and Simulations in Informal Science Education. WCER Working Paper No. 2010-14. , 2010 .

[11]  Charles H. Atwood,et al.  Using Item Response Theory To Identify and Address Difficult Topics in General Chemistry , 2011 .

[12]  Mária Bieliková,et al.  Encouragement of Collaborative Learning Based on Dynamic Groups , 2012, EC-TEL.

[13]  Jessica Watkins,et al.  Retaining Students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Majors , 2013 .

[14]  Yuan-Cheng Lai,et al.  Harnessing Collaborative Annotations on Online Formative Assessments , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[15]  Tyson R. Henry Creating effective student groups: an introduction to groupformation.org , 2013, SIGCSE '13.

[16]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  The ASSISTments Ecosystem: Building a Platform that Brings Scientists and Teachers Together for Minimally Invasive Research on Human Learning and Teaching , 2014, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[17]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  A Study of Exploring Different Schedules of Spacing and Retrieval Interval on Mathematics Skills in ITS Environment , 2014, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[18]  H. Everson,et al.  Leveraging the power of peer-led learning: investigating effects on STEM performance in urban high schools , 2015 .

[19]  Craig Zilles,et al.  Computerized Testing: A Vision and Initial Experiences , 2015 .

[20]  Yan Wang,et al.  Improving students' long-term retention performance: a study on personalized retention schedules , 2015, LAK.

[21]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  The Status of the Testing Effect for Complex Materials: Still a Winner , 2015 .

[22]  Xiaolu Xiong,et al.  Improving Long-Term Retention Level in an Environment of Personalized Expanding Intervals , 2015, EDM.

[23]  Richard Hartshorne,et al.  Redesigning Computer Engineering Gateway Courses Using a Novel Remediation Hierarchy , 2016 .

[24]  Richard Hartshorne,et al.  Digitizing and Remediating Engineering Assessments: An Immersive and Transportable Faculty Development Workshop , 2017 .

[25]  D. Turgut,et al.  Multidisciplinary Undergraduate Research Experience in the Internet of Things: Student Outcomes, Faculty Perceptions, and Lessons Learned , 2017 .

[26]  Richard Hartshorne,et al.  GLASS: Group Learning At Significant Scale via WiFi-Enabled Learner Design Teams in an ECE Flipped Classroom , 2017 .

[27]  Richard Hartshorne,et al.  Elevating Learner Achievement Using Formative Electronic Lab Assessments in the Engineering Laboratory: A Viable Alternative to Weekly Lab Reports , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Education.