The Electromagnetic Signature of Outward Propagating Ion-scale Waves

First results from the Parker Solar Probe (PSP) mission have revealed ubiquitous coherent ion-scale waves in the inner heliosphere, which are signatures of kinetic wave–particle interactions and fluid instabilities. However, initial studies of the circularly polarized ion-scale waves observed by PSP have only thoroughly analyzed magnetic field signatures, precluding a determination of solar wind frame propagation direction and intrinsic wave polarization. A comprehensive determination of wave properties requires measurements of both electric and magnetic fields. Here, we use full capabilities of the PSP/FIELDS instrument suite to measure both the electric and magnetic components of circularly polarized waves. Comparing spacecraft frame magnetic field measurements with the Doppler-shifted cold plasma dispersion relation for parallel transverse waves constrains allowable plasma frame polarizations and wavevectors. We demonstrate that the Doppler-shifted cold plasma dispersion has a maximum spacecraft frequency for which intrinsically right-handed fast-magnetosonic waves propagating sunwards can appear left-handed in the spacecraft frame. Observations of left-handed waves with are uniquely explained by intrinsically left-handed, ion-cyclotron waves (ICWs). We demonstrate that electric field measurements for waves with are consistent with ICWs propagating away from the Sun, verifying the measured electric field. Applying the verified electric field measurements to the full distribution of waves suggests that, in the solar wind frame, the vast majority of waves propagate away from the Sun, indicating that the observed population of coherent ion-scale waves contains both intrinsically left- and right-hand polarized modes.

[1]  F. Mozer,et al.  DC and Low‐Frequency Electric Field Measurements on the Parker Solar Probe , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics.

[2]  R. Livi,et al.  Parker Solar Probe Observations of Proton Beams Simultaneous with Ion-scale Waves , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[3]  S. Bale,et al.  A Merged Search‐Coil and Fluxgate Magnetometer Data Product for Parker Solar Probe FIELDS , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics.

[4]  R. Livi,et al.  Cross Helicity Reversals in Magnetic Switchbacks , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[5]  R. Livi,et al.  Proton Temperature Anisotropy Variations in Inner Heliosphere Estimated with the First Parker Solar Probe Observations , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[6]  Michael T. McManus,et al.  Ion-scale Electromagnetic Waves in the Inner Heliosphere , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[7]  W. Matthaeus,et al.  Switchbacks in the Near-Sun Magnetic Field: Long Memory and Impact on the Turbulence Cascade , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[8]  R. Livi,et al.  The Solar Probe Cup on the Parker Solar Probe , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[9]  R. Livi,et al.  Magnetic Connectivity of the Ecliptic Plane within 0.5 au: Potential Field Source Surface Modeling of the First Parker Solar Probe Encounter , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[10]  D. Stansby,et al.  Highly structured slow solar wind emerging from an equatorial coronal hole , 2019, Nature.

[11]  T. Horbury,et al.  Linear Stability in the Inner Heliosphere: Helios Re-evaluated , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[12]  F. Carbone,et al.  Ion Cyclotron Waves in Field-aligned Solar Wind Turbulence , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[13]  F. Mozer,et al.  Statistical Study of Whistler Waves in the Solar Wind at 1 au , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[14]  C. Owen,et al.  Parallel-propagating Fluctuations at Proton-kinetic Scales in the Solar Wind Are Dominated By Kinetic Instabilities , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[15]  C. Owen,et al.  Magnetic Helicity of Solar Wind Fluctuations at Ion-kinetic Scales , 2019, 1905.04951.

[16]  F. Mozer,et al.  Whistler Wave Generation by Halo Electrons in the Solar Wind , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[17]  J. Huang,et al.  On the Generation Mechanism of Electromagnetic Cyclotron Waves in the Solar Wind: Statistical Results from Wind Observations , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[18]  K. Klein,et al.  The multi-scale nature of the solar wind , 2018, Living Reviews in Solar Physics.

[19]  J. Kasper,et al.  Majority of Solar Wind Intervals Support Ion-Driven Instabilities. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[20]  P. Yoon Kinetic instabilities in the solar wind driven by temperature anisotropies , 2017 .

[21]  M. Lockwood,et al.  The Solar Probe Plus Mission: Humanity’s First Visit to Our Star , 2016 .

[22]  T. Horbury,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF WHISTLER WAVE DISPERSION RELATION IN THE SOLAR WIND , 2016, 1609.03039.

[23]  P. Bellan Revised single‐spacecraft method for determining wave vector k and resolving space‐time ambiguity , 2016 .

[24]  D. Summers,et al.  The Digital Fields Board for the FIELDS instrument suite on the Solar Probe Plus mission: Analog and digital signal processing , 2016 .

[25]  E. Quataert,et al.  COLLISIONLESS ISOTROPIZATION OF THE SOLAR-WIND PROTONS BY COMPRESSIVE FLUCTUATIONS AND PLASMA INSTABILITIES , 2016, 1605.07143.

[26]  D. Werthimer,et al.  The FIELDS Instrument Suite for Solar Probe Plus , 2016, Space Science Reviews.

[27]  Robert T. Wicks,et al.  A PROTON-CYCLOTRON WAVE STORM GENERATED BY UNSTABLE PROTON DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS IN THE SOLAR WIND , 2016 .

[28]  J. Kasper,et al.  Ion‐driven instabilities in the solar wind: Wind observations of 19 March 2005 , 2015, Journal of geophysical research. Space physics.

[29]  S. Boardsen,et al.  MESSENGER survey of in situ low frequency wave storms between 0.3 and 0.7 AU , 2015 .

[30]  John W. Belcher,et al.  Solar Wind Electrons Alphas and Protons (SWEAP) Investigation: Design of the Solar Wind and Coronal Plasma Instrument Suite for Solar Probe Plus , 2015 .

[31]  G. Howes,et al.  THE VIOLATION OF THE TAYLOR HYPOTHESIS IN MEASUREMENTS OF SOLAR WIND TURBULENCE , 2014, 1406.5470.

[32]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES NEAR THE PROTON CYCLOTRON FREQUENCY: STEREO OBSERVATIONS , 2014 .

[33]  G. Howes,et al.  PHYSICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE ANGLE-DEPENDENT MAGNETIC HELICITY SPECTRUM IN THE SOLAR WIND: THE NATURE OF TURBULENT FLUCTUATIONS NEAR THE PROTON GYRORADIUS SCALE , 2014, 1403.2306.

[34]  B. Chandran,et al.  A PARALLEL-PROPAGATING ALFVÉNIC ION-BEAM INSTABILITY IN THE HIGH-BETA SOLAR WIND , 2013, 1306.2531.

[35]  M. Velli,et al.  Proton thermal energetics in the solar wind: Helios reloaded , 2013 .

[36]  P. Bellan Reply to comment by R. L. Lysak on “Improved basis set for low frequency plasma waves” , 2012 .

[37]  F. Mozer,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF KINETIC ALFVÉN WAVE TURBULENCE IN THE SOLAR WIND , 2012 .

[38]  S. Gary,et al.  EFFECT OF DIFFERENTIAL FLOW OF ALPHA PARTICLES ON PROTON PRESSURE ANISOTROPY INSTABILITIES IN THE SOLAR WIND , 2011 .

[39]  S. Gary,et al.  MAGNETIC HELICITY SPECTRUM OF SOLAR WIND FLUCTUATIONS AS A FUNCTION OF THE ANGLE WITH RESPECT TO THE LOCAL MEAN MAGNETIC FIELD , 2011 .

[40]  Jiansen He,et al.  POSSIBLE EVIDENCE OF ALFVÉN-CYCLOTRON WAVES IN THE ANGLE DISTRIBUTION OF MAGNETIC HELICITY OF SOLAR WIND TURBULENCE , 2011 .

[41]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  Observations of ion cyclotron waves in the solar wind near 0.3 AU , 2010 .

[42]  E. Quataert,et al.  ON THE INTERPRETATION OF MAGNETIC HELICITY SIGNATURES IN THE DISSIPATION RANGE OF SOLAR WIND TURBULENCE , 2009, 0910.5023.

[43]  K. Glassmeier,et al.  Evaluation of magnetic helicity density in the wave number domain using multi-point measurements in space , 2009 .

[44]  C. Russell,et al.  ION CYCLOTRON WAVES IN THE SOLAR WIND OBSERVED BY STEREO NEAR 1 AU , 2009 .

[45]  E. Marsch Kinetic Physics of the Solar Corona and Solar Wind , 2006 .

[46]  A. Lazarus,et al.  Solar wind proton temperature anisotropy: Linear theory and WIND/SWE observations , 2006 .

[47]  T. Horbury,et al.  Measurement of the electric fluctuation spectrum of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[48]  Ondrej Santolik,et al.  Singular value decomposition methods for wave propagation analysis , 2003 .

[49]  R. Ergun,et al.  Electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves at proton cyclotron harmonics , 2002 .

[50]  Alan J. Lazarus,et al.  Wind/SWE observations of firehose constraint on solar wind proton temperature anisotropy , 2002 .

[51]  J. Steinberg,et al.  Proton temperature anisotropy constraint in the solar wind: ACE observations , 2001 .

[52]  L. Yin,et al.  Alpha/proton magnetosonic instability in the solar wind , 2000 .

[53]  R. Elphic,et al.  Characteristics of electromagnetic proton cyclotron waves along auroral field lines observed by FAST in regions of upward current , 1998 .

[54]  S. Peter Gary,et al.  Theory of Space Plasma Microinstabilities , 1993 .

[55]  S. Peter Gary,et al.  The mirror and ion cyclotron anisotropy instabilities , 1992 .

[56]  R. Elphic,et al.  ISEE 1 observations of electrostatic ion cyclotron waves in association with ion beams on auroral field lines from ∼2.5 to 4.5 RE , 1991 .

[57]  S. Gary,et al.  Electromagnetic ion/ion instabilities and their consequences in space plasmas: A review , 1991 .

[58]  F. Coroniti,et al.  Ambiguities in the deduction of rest frame fluctuation spectrums from spectrums computed in moving frames , 1976 .

[59]  J. Hollweg,et al.  Transverse Alfvén waves in the solar wind: Arbitrary k, v 0, B 0, and |δB| , 1974 .

[60]  J. Means Use of the three‐dimensional covariance matrix in analyzing the polarization properties of plane waves , 1972 .

[61]  S. Gary,et al.  Observed constraint on proton‐proton relative velocities in the solar wind , 2000 .

[62]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[63]  Joseph P. Dougherty,et al.  Waves in plasmas. , 1993 .

[64]  T. H. Stix Waves in plasmas , 1992 .

[65]  L. J. Cahill,et al.  Magnetopause structure and attitude from Explorer 12 observations. , 1967 .