Perceptual video quality comparison of various 3D video formats and displays

Abstract As 3D imaging and display technologies have advanced, several 3D video formats have been developed and different kinds of 3D displays have been made available in the market. There have been efforts to standardize the signaling and data format for 3D content delivery. In this regard, the quality of experience (QoE) of 3D programs has emerged as an important issue. In order to investigate the impact of different 3D representation formats and different display technologies on perceptual video quality, a number of subjective video quality tests were conducted using various 3D representation formats and different stereoscopic displays. In particular, the side-by-side (SBS), top–bottom (TB) and frame-sequential formats were tested using active displays and passive displays. The experimental results were analyzed and it is observed that the relative perceptual 3D video quality was consistent across the 3D video formats and displays.

[1]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Traffic and Statistical Multiplexing Characterization of 3-D Video Representation Formats , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[2]  P. Le Callet,et al.  Subjective evaluation of HDTV stereoscopic videos in IPTV scenarios using absolute category rating , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Asymmetrically Compressed Stereoscopic 3D Videos: Quality Assessment and Rate-Distortion Performance Evaluation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Ja-Ling Wu,et al.  Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic 3D Image Compression by Binocular Integration Behaviors , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Wilhelm Burger,et al.  Principles of Digital Image Processing - Core Algorithms , 2009, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science.

[6]  Zhihan Lv,et al.  Stereoscopic image quality assessment method based on binocular combination saliency model , 2016, Signal Process..

[7]  Tao Chen,et al.  3D-TV Content Storage and Transmission , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[8]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Subjective evaluation of stereoscopic image quality , 2013, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[9]  Joan Fisher Box,et al.  Guinness, Gosset, Fisher, and Small Samples , 1987 .

[10]  David B. L. Bong,et al.  Quality assessment of stereoscopic image by 3D structural similarity , 2017, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[11]  Marcus Barkowsky,et al.  Perceived 3D TV Transmission Quality Assessment: Multi-Laboratory Results Using Absolute Category Rating on Quality of Experience Scale , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.