Modifying modifiers: what happens when interspecific interactions interact?

1. The strength of the trophic link between any given pair of species in a food web is likely to depend on the presence and/or densities of other species in the community. How these trophic interaction modifications (TIMs) interact with one another to produce a net modifying effect is an important but under-explored issue. 2. We review several specific types of TIMs that are well understood to address whether the magnitude of the net modification changes with the number of modifiers, and whether modifiers usually increase or decrease each other's effects. 3. Modifications of interactions are generally not independent. It is likely that TIMs interact antagonistically in the majority of cases; the magnitudes of TIMs decrease as more modifiers are added, or new TIMs reduce the magnitudes of modifications that are already present. 4. Individual modifications are likely to have a smaller effect in many-species systems than expected from independent combination of modifications measured in systems with relatively few species. Thus, models that lack explicit TIMs may in some cases yield adequate predictions for species-level perturbations, provided that the net effects of TIMs are implicitly included in measured interaction strengths. 5. Many types of TIMs share structural similarities. Nevertheless, a complete understanding of their effects may require theory that distinguishes different 'functional groups' of modifiers and addresses how these are structured according to trophic relationships.

[1]  Barbara Drossel,et al.  The impact of nonlinear functional responses on the long-term evolution of food web structure. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  S. McNaughton Serengeti Ungulates: Feeding Selectivity Influences the Effectiveness of Plant Defense Guilds , 1978, Science.

[3]  Hiroyuki Matsuda,et al.  Effects of adaptive predatory and anti-predator behaviour in a two-prey—one-predator system , 1993, Evolutionary Ecology.

[4]  P. Abrams Quantitative descriptions of resource choice in ecological models , 2009, Population Ecology.

[5]  J. Emmett Duffy,et al.  Food and Shelter as Determinants of Food Choice by an Herbivorous Marine Amphipod , 1991 .

[6]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  THEORETICAL CONCEPTS AND EMPIRICAL APPROACHES TO MEASURING INTERACTION STRENGTH , 1998 .

[7]  S. Peacor,et al.  The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  P. Abrams The functional responses of adaptive consumers of two resources , 1987 .

[9]  M. Power Predator Avoidance by Grazing Fishes in Temperate and Tropical Streams : Importance of Stream Depth and Prey Size , 2009 .

[10]  Vlastimil Krivan,et al.  Dynamic Ideal Free Distribution: Effects of Optimal Patch Choice on Predator-Prey Dynamics , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[11]  E. Korpimäki,et al.  Microhabitat use and behavior of voles under weasel and raptor predation risk: predator facilitation? , 1996 .

[12]  P. Enderlein,et al.  Effects of epibiosis on consumer–prey interactions , 1997, Hydrobiologia.

[13]  J. Stachowicz,et al.  Geographic Variation in Camouflage Specialization by a Decorator Crab , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[14]  S. Kohler,et al.  Facilitation between herons and smallmouth bass foraging on common prey , 2007, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[15]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Describing and quantifying interspecific interactions: a commentary on recent approaches , 2001 .

[16]  R. Relyea,et al.  The rules of engagement: how to defend against combinations of predators , 2007, Oecologia.

[17]  S. Peacor,et al.  HOW DEPENDENT ARE SPECIES-PAIR INTERACTION STRENGTHS ON OTHER SPECIES IN THE FOOD WEB? , 2004 .

[18]  L. Dill,et al.  Risk of predation and the feeding behavior of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Ecological networks - foodwebs and beyond , 2009 .

[20]  A Sih,et al.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  Mark Novak,et al.  Estimating nonlinear interaction strengths: an observation-based method for species-rich food webs. , 2008, Ecology.

[22]  P. Abrams Implications of Dynamically Variable Traits for Identifying, Classifying, and Measuring Direct and Indirect Effects in Ecological Communities , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[23]  P. Abrams,et al.  Effects of predator-specific defence on community complexity , 1994, Evolutionary Ecology.

[24]  A. Hastings,et al.  Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature , 1998, Nature.

[25]  S. Chamberlain,et al.  Optimal defence theory predicts investment in extrafloral nectar resources in an ant–plant mutualism , 2009 .

[26]  R. Tollrian,et al.  The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses , 1990, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[27]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Foraging Time Optimization and Interactions in Food Webs , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[28]  S. L. Lima Stress and Decision Making under the Risk of Predation: Recent Developments from Behavioral, Reproductive, and Ecological Perspectives , 1998 .

[29]  W. Morris,et al.  Integrating quality and quantity of mutualistic service to contrast ant species protecting Ferocactus wislizeni. , 2006, Ecology.

[30]  Jeffrey M Dambacher,et al.  UNDERSTANDING AND PREDICTING EFFECTS OF MODIFIED INTERACTIONS THROUGH A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF COMMUNITY STRUCTURE , 2007, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[31]  Hiroyuki Matsuda,et al.  Effects of predator-specific defence on biodiversity and community complexity in two-trophic-level communities , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[32]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Trait and density mediated indirect interactions in simple food webs , 2004 .

[33]  R. Arditi,et al.  Rheagogies: Modelling non-trophic effects in food webs , 2005 .

[34]  Ted J. Case,et al.  Higher Order Interactions in Ecological Communities: What Are They and How Can They be Detected? , 1994 .

[35]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Arguments in Favor of Higher Order Interactions , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[36]  D. Bolnick,et al.  SCARED TO DEATH? THE EFFECTS OF INTIMIDATION AND CONSUMPTION IN PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS , 2005 .

[37]  Robert J. Radke,et al.  Effects of phytoplankton-induced turbidity on predation success of piscivorous Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis): possible implications for fish community structure in lakes , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[38]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Implications of flexible foraging for interspecific interactions: lessons from simple models , 2010 .

[39]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Predators that Benefit Prey and Prey that Harm Predators: Unusual Effects of Interacting Foraging Adaptation , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[40]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation , 2004 .

[41]  P. Abrams Measuring the impact of dynamic antipredator traits on predator-prey-resource interactions. , 2008, Ecology.

[42]  Michio Kondoh,et al.  Anti-predator defence and the complexity–stability relationship of food webs , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  Hiroyuki Matsuda,et al.  Effects of predator-specific complexity defence on community , 1994 .

[44]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  Habitat Selection Under Predation Hazard: Test of a Model with Foraging Minnows. , 1987, Ecology.

[45]  D. Sylvia,et al.  Nitrogen affects the phosphorus response of VA mycorrhiza. , 1990, The New phytologist.

[46]  P. Abrams,et al.  The effect of adaptive anti-predator behavior on exploitative competition and mutualism between predators , 1993 .

[47]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Predator facilitation: the combined effect of snakes and owls on the foraging behavior of gerbils , 1992 .

[48]  Benjamin M Bolker,et al.  On quantitative measures of indirect interactions. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[49]  R. Zamora,et al.  Conditional outcomes in plant/herbivore interactions: neighbours matter , 2006 .

[50]  Ralph Tollrian,et al.  Consumer‐food systems: why type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders , 2004, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[51]  E. Groner,et al.  The interaction between bird predation and plant cover in determining habitat occupancy of darkling beetles , 2001 .

[52]  Craig Packer,et al.  Planning for success: Serengeti lions seek prey accessibility rather than abundance , 2005 .

[53]  D. Soluk Multiple Predator Effects: Predicting Combined Functional Response of Stream Fish and Invertebrate Predators , 1993 .

[54]  E. Werner,et al.  Ecological Consequences of the Trade-Off between Growth and Mortality Rates Mediated by Foraging Activity , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[55]  R. B. Root,et al.  The influence of vegetational diversity on the population ecology of a specialized herbivore, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) , 1972, Oecologia.

[56]  J. Pelletier,et al.  Are large complex ecosystems more unstable? A theoretical reassessment with predator switching. , 2000, Mathematical biosciences.

[57]  Rick A. Relyea,et al.  HOW PREY RESPOND TO COMBINED PREDATORS: A REVIEW AND AN EMPIRICAL TEST , 2003 .

[58]  J. Wootton Indirect effects in complex ecosystems: recent progress and future challenges , 2002 .

[59]  Larry B. Crowder,et al.  Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey , 1982 .

[60]  S. Peacor,et al.  A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 2003 .

[61]  John M. Fryxell,et al.  Individual Behavior and Community Dynamics , 1997, Population and Community Biology Series.

[62]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Parallel ecological networks in ecosystems , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  E. Charnov,et al.  Ecological Implications of Resource Depression , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[64]  F. Rahel,et al.  Complex predator-prey interactions and predator intimidation among crayfish, piscivorous fish, and small benthic fish , 1988, Oecologia.

[65]  John L. Orrock,et al.  Predator hunting mode and habitat domain alter nonconsumptive effects in predator-prey interactions. , 2007, Ecology.

[66]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Adaptive foragers and community ecology: linking individuals to communities and ecosystems , 2010 .

[67]  Fabian M Jaksic,et al.  Why are native herbs in the Chilean matorral more abundant beneath bushes: microclimate or grazing? , 1980 .

[68]  R. Relyea,et al.  Detecting small environmental differences: risk-response curves for predator-induced behavior and morphology , 2007, Oecologia.

[69]  Barbara Drossel,et al.  The structure of food webs with adaptive behaviour , 2007 .

[70]  K. Wiackowski,et al.  The effect of predator and prey density on the induced defence of a ciliate , 1999 .

[71]  Vlastimil Křivan,et al.  CONNECTING THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL STUDIES OF TRAIT‐MEDIATED INTERACTIONS , 2003 .

[72]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Ecological networks : beyond food webs Ecological networks – beyond food webs , 2008 .

[73]  H. Liere,et al.  Cascading trait‐mediation: disruption of a trait‐mediated mutualism by parasite‐induced behavioral modification , 2010 .

[74]  P. Joly,et al.  Costs and limits of dosage response to predation risk: to what extent can tadpoles invest in anti-predator morphology? , 2005, Oecologia.

[75]  J. Lawton Are there general laws in ecology , 1999 .

[76]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Filling key gaps in population and community ecology , 2007 .

[77]  Michio Kondoh,et al.  Response to Comment on "Foraging Adaptation and the Relationship Between Food-Web Complexity and Stability" , 2003, Science.

[78]  J. Wootton Putting the Pieces Together: Testing the Independence of Interactions among Organisms , 1994 .

[79]  M. Loreau,et al.  Nontrophic Interactions, Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Functioning: An Interaction Web Model , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[80]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Linking Individual‐Scale Trait Plasticity to Community Dynamics1 , 2003 .

[81]  D. Bolnick,et al.  When predators don't eat their prey: nonconsumptive predator effects on prey dynamics. , 2008, Ecology.

[82]  Michio Kondoh,et al.  Food-chain length and adaptive foraging , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[83]  R. Relyea FINE‐TUNED PHENOTYPES: TADPOLE PLASTICITY UNDER 16 COMBINATIONS OF PREDATORS AND COMPETITORS , 2004 .

[84]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  PREDICTING DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH USING EXPERIMENTS AND PATH ANALYSIS' , 1994 .

[85]  Ian R. Sanders,et al.  Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity , 1998, Nature.