Interactive networks and social knowledge construction behavioral patterns in primary school teachers' online collaborative learning activities

Abstract A four-stage online collaborative learning approach to supporting teachers' professional development was proposed and described in this paper. This study investigated primary school teachers' interactive networks and social knowledge construction behavioral patterns in online collaborative learning activities. The subject of this study was 83 primary school Chinese teachers who were participating in a structured online professional development program that was 6 months in duration. By combining social network analysis, content analysis and lag sequential analysis, results showed that interactive networks generated in two rounds of online collaborative learning activities were low reciprocal, and loosely connected with a low cohesiveness. There was no significant difference of behavior distributions between core and peripheral members. Moreover, teachers' social knowledge construction behavioral patterns presented different characteristics in different rounds of activities. In addition, this study identified certain problems in teachers' online learning. Finally, some implications for the design of teacher education programs, limitations and further research plans are proposed.

[1]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis , 1986 .

[2]  Sheng-Yi Wu,et al.  Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[3]  D. Jonassen Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? , 1991 .

[4]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[5]  Hsinyi Peng,et al.  From Virtual Environments to Physical Environments: Exploring Interactivity in Ubiquitous-learning Systems , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[6]  M. Fay,et al.  Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules. , 2010, Statistics surveys.

[7]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[8]  M. David Merrill,et al.  Second generation instructional design (ID 2 ) , 1990 .

[9]  Heng Hou What makes an online community of practice work? A situated study of Chinese student teachers’ perceptions of online professional learning , 2015 .

[10]  D. Beijaard,et al.  Teacher learning in the context of a continuing professional development programme: A case study , 2015 .

[11]  P. Herbst,et al.  A study of the quality of interaction among participants in online animation-based conversations about mathematics teaching , 2016 .

[12]  Dita Fischl,et al.  Reflective Writing in Pre-Service Teachers' Teaching: What Does It Promote?. , 2012 .

[13]  Qiyun Wang,et al.  Surveying Chinese In-Service K12 Teachers’ Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge , 2015 .

[14]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[15]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[16]  Hsiu-Mei Huang Instructional Technologies Facilitating Online Courses. , 2000 .

[17]  Chien Chou,et al.  Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: a technical framework for designers , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[18]  Philip Smith Roger Bakeman John M. Gottman , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Models of core/periphery structures , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[20]  C. Haythornthwaite Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange☆ , 1996 .

[21]  Myint Swe Khine,et al.  An Analysis of Interaction and Participation Patterns in Online Community , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[22]  Jeffrey Paul Carpenter,et al.  "Together we are better": Professional learning networks for teachers , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Niall Seery,et al.  Promoting deep learning in a teacher education programme through self- and peer-assessment and feedback , 2012 .

[24]  Allan Jeong The Sequential Analysis of Group Interaction and Critical Thinking in Online , 2003 .

[25]  Sue Cherrington,et al.  Using video to promote early childhood teachers' thinking and reflection , 2014 .

[26]  Hsiu-Lien Lu,et al.  Research on Peer Coaching in Preservice Teacher Education--A Review of Literature. , 2010 .

[27]  Xiaofan Lin,et al.  A social network analysis of teaching and research collaboration in a teachers' virtual learning community , 2016, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[28]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  The use of online synchronous discussion for web-based professional development for teachers , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[29]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism and computer‐mediated communication in distance education , 1995 .

[30]  Panagiotis Tsiotakis,et al.  Critical factors towards analysing teachers' presence in on-line learning communities , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[31]  Liam Rourke,et al.  Validity in quantitative content analysis , 2004 .

[32]  Pei-Wei Tsai,et al.  Comparing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of problem-based online asynchronous discussion in e/m-learning environments , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Karen Stepanyan,et al.  Culture, role and group work: A social network analysis perspective on an online collaborative course , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[34]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: A review of the literature , 2000 .

[35]  Daniel C. A. Hillman,et al.  Learner-Interface Interaction in Distance Education: An Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners , 1994 .

[36]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[37]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Interactivity in online discussions and learning outcomes , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Social network analysis of peer relationships and online interactions in a blended class using blogs , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[39]  Nicole Miller Rigelman,et al.  Creating Foundations for Collaboration in Schools: Utilizing Professional Learning Communities to Support Teacher Candidate Learning and Visions of Teaching , 2012 .

[40]  Thomas H. Paulsen,et al.  Using Social Network Analysis to Measure Student Collaboration in an Undergraduate Capstone Course , 2016 .

[41]  Uwe Matzat,et al.  Do blended virtual learning communities enhance teachers' professional development more than purely virtual ones? A large scale empirical comparison , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Xiaojie Li,et al.  Group interactive network and behavioral patterns in online English-to-Chinese cooperative translation activity , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[43]  António Moreira,et al.  Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Kenneth A. Anderson,et al.  Peer Coaching and Pre-Service Teachers: Examining an Underutilised Concept. , 2010 .

[45]  Wen-Chun Chen Professional growth during cyber collaboration between pre-service and in-service teachers , 2012 .

[46]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality , 2006, Soc. Networks.

[47]  Geert Devos,et al.  Relating school leadership to perceived professional learning community characteristics: a multilevel analysis , 2016 .

[48]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Using blogs as a professional development tool for teachers: analysis of interaction behavioral patterns , 2009, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[49]  Jie-Chi Yang,et al.  Development and Evaluation of an Interactive Mobile Learning Environment with Shared Display Groupware , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[50]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A spreadsheet-based visualized Mindtool for improving students’ learning performance in identifying relationships between numerical variables , 2015, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[51]  M. R. Luz,et al.  Learning with their peers: Using a virtual learning community to improve an in-service Biology teacher education program in Brazil , 2014 .

[52]  Eunice Tang,et al.  Building an effective online learning community (OLC) in blog-based teaching portfolios , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[53]  Huei-Tse Hou,et al.  Exploring the behavioral patterns of learners in an educational massively multiple online role-playing game (MMORPG) , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[54]  H. Toutenburg Fleiss, J. L.: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. John Wiley & Sons, New York‐London‐Sydney‐Toronto 1973. XIII, 233 S. , 1974 .

[55]  Qiyun Wang,et al.  A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into teaching and learning , 2008 .

[56]  Jennifer Duncan-Howell,et al.  Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[57]  Raymond Flores,et al.  Microblogging about teaching: Nurturing participatory cultures through collaborative online reflection with pre-service teachers , 2014 .

[58]  Miguel Ángel Herrera Pavo,et al.  Interaction analysis of a blog/journal of teaching practice , 2015, Internet High. Educ..