The use of meta-analysis or research synthesis to combine driving simulation or naturalistic study results on driver distraction.

Three important and inter-related topics are addressed in this paper. First, the importance of meta-analysis and research synthesis methods to combine studies on traffic safety, in general, and on driver distraction, in particular, is briefly reviewed. Second, naturalistic, epidemiologic, and driving simulation studies on driver distraction are used to illustrate convergent and divergent results that have accumulated thus far in this domain of research. In particular, mobile phone conversation, passenger presence, and text messaging naturalistic studies use meta-analyses and research syntheses to illustrate important patterns of results that are in need of more in-depth study. Third, a number of driver distraction study limitations such as poorly defined dependent variables, lack of methodological detail, and omission of statistical information prevent the integration of many studies into meta-analyses. In addition, the overall quality of road safety studies suffers from these same limitations and suggestions for improvement are made to guide researchers and reviewers. Practical Applications. The use of research synthesis and meta-analysis provide comprehensive estimates of the impact of distractions on driving performance, which can be used to guide public policy and future research.

[1]  Alena Erke Red light for red-light cameras? A meta-analysis of the effects of red-light cameras on crashes. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  A Scott Tippetts,et al.  A meta-analysis of .08 BAC laws in 19 jurisdictions in the United States. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  Mark Woodward,et al.  Epidemiology: Study Design and Data Analysis , 1999 .

[5]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis , 2009 .

[6]  Torgeir Vaa,et al.  Meta-analysis of the effect of road safety campaigns on accidents. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Joanna R Meyers,et al.  The Influence of Passengers on Older Drivers Involved in Fatal Crashes , 2004, Experimental aging research.

[8]  D. Roth,et al.  Cumulative Meta-analysis of the Relationship Between Useful Field of View and Driving Performance in Older Adults: Current and Future Implications , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  Juerg Schwitter,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 , 2010, European journal of heart failure.

[10]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) , 1997 .

[11]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Risk of road accident associated with the use of drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from epidemiological studies. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Jeff K. Caird,et al.  Twelve Practical and Useful Questions about Driving Simulation , 2011 .

[13]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Leland Wilkinson,et al.  Statistical Methods in Psychology Journals Guidelines and Explanations , 2005 .

[15]  M. Woodward,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  E R Braver,et al.  Carrying passengers as a risk factor for crashes fatal to 16- and 17-year-old drivers. , 2000, JAMA.

[17]  Jim P. Stimpson,et al.  Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[18]  Jeremy D Sudweeks,et al.  An Analysis of Driver Inattention Using a Case-Crossover Approach On 100-Car Data: Final Report , 2010 .

[19]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  The blind date: the effects of change blindness, passenger conversation and gender on looked-but-failed-to-see (LBFTS) errors. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Bruce Simons-Morton,et al.  The observed effects of teenage passengers on the risky driving behavior of teenage drivers. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Charles J DiMaggio,et al.  Marijuana use and motor vehicle crashes. , 2012, Epidemiologic reviews.

[22]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[23]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[24]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Effects of Mobile Phone Use on Accident Risk , 2011 .

[25]  R Elvik,et al.  Evaluating the statistical conclusion validity of weighted mean results in meta-analysis by analysing funnel graph diagrams. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  M. Asbridge,et al.  Acute cannabis consumption and motor vehicle collision risk: systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  L. Hedges,et al.  Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[28]  Rune Elvik,et al.  The Handbook of Road Safety Measures , 2009 .

[29]  M. Reger,et al.  The relationship between neuropsychological functioning and driving ability in dementia: a meta-analysis. , 2004, Neuropsychology.

[30]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  Paul A. Green Using standards to improve the replicability and applicability of driver interface research , 2012, AutomotiveUI.