Locomotion and Control of a Self-Propelled Shape-Changing Body in a Fluid

In this paper we study the locomotion of a shape-changing body swimming in a two-dimensional perfect fluid of infinite extent. The shape changes are prescribed as functions of time satisfying constraints ensuring that they result from the work of internal forces only: conditions necessary for the locomotion to be termed self-propelled. The net rigid motion of the body results from the exchange of momentum between these shape changes and the surrounding fluid.The aim of this paper is three-fold.First, it describes a rigorous framework for the study of animal locomotion in fluid. Our model differs from previous ones mostly in that the number of degrees of freedom related to the shape changes is infinite. The Euler–Lagrange equation is obtained by applying the least action principle to the system body fluid. The formalism of Analytic Mechanics provides a simple way to handle the strong coupling between the internal dynamics of the body causing the shape changes and the dynamics of the fluid. The Euler–Lagrange equation takes the form of a coupled system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and partial differential equations (PDEs). The existence and uniqueness of solutions for this system are rigorously proved.Second, we are interested in making clear the connection between shape changes and internal forces. Although classical, it can be quite surprising to select the shape changes to play the role of control because the internal forces they are due to seem to be a more natural and realistic choice. We prove that, when the number of degrees of freedom relating to the shape changes is finite, both choices are actually equivalent in the sense that there is a one-to-one relation between shape changes and internal forces.Third, we show how the control problem, consisting in associating with each shape change the resulting trajectory of the swimming body, can be analysed within the framework of geometric control theory. This allows us to take advantage of the powerful tools of differential geometry, such as the notion of Lie brackets or the Orbit Theorem and to obtain the first theoretical result (to our knowledge) of control for a swimming body in an ideal fluid. We derive some interesting and surprising tracking properties: For instance, for any given shape changes producing a net displacement in the fluid (say, moving forward), we prove that other shape changes arbitrarily close to the previous ones exist, which lead to a completely different motion (for instance, moving backward): This phenomenon will be called Moonwalking. Most of our results are illustrated by numerical examples.

[1]  Joel W. Burdick,et al.  Fluid locomotion and trajectory planning for shape-changing robots , 2003 .

[2]  Williams,et al.  Self-propelled anguilliform swimming: simultaneous solution of the two-dimensional navier-stokes equations and Newton's laws of motion , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Modelling efficient pisciform swimming for control , 2000 .

[4]  Alexandre Munnier,et al.  ON THE SELF-DISPLACEMENT OF DEFORMABLE BODIES IN A POTENTIAL FLUID FLOW , 2008 .

[5]  T. Miloh,et al.  Self-propulsion of general deformable shapes in a perfect fluid , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  Bronis law Jakubczyk Introduction to Geometric Nonlinear Control ; Controllability and Lie Bracket , 2007 .

[7]  François Alouges,et al.  Optimal Strokes for Low Reynolds Number Swimmers: An Example , 2008, J. Nonlinear Sci..

[8]  Mario Sigalotti,et al.  Tracking Control for an Ellipsoidal Submarine Driven by Kirchhoff's Laws , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[9]  H. Cartan,et al.  Théorie élémentaire des fonctions analytiques d'une ou plusieurs variables complexes , 1961 .

[10]  Jerrold E. Marsden,et al.  Locomotion of Articulated Bodies in a Perfect Fluid , 2005, J. Nonlinear Sci..

[11]  J.E. Marsden,et al.  Optimal Motion of an Articulated Body in a Perfect Fluid , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[12]  A. Agrachev,et al.  Control Theory from the Geometric Viewpoint , 2004 .

[13]  Jair Koiller,et al.  LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER SWIMMING IN TWO DIMENSIONS , 2000 .

[14]  R. Montgomery A Tour of Subriemannian Geometries, Their Geodesics and Applications , 2006 .

[15]  Alexandre Munnier,et al.  Locomotion of articulated bodies in an ideal fluid: 2d model with buoyancy, circulation and collisions , 2010 .

[16]  T. Y. Wu,et al.  Mathematical biofluiddynamics and mechanophysiology of fish locomotion , 2001 .

[17]  Jaume Llibre,et al.  Hamiltonian systems and celestial mechanics , 1993 .

[18]  Dmitry A. Onishchenko,et al.  Motion of a Body with Undeformable Shell and Variable Mass Geometry in an Unbounded Perfect Fluid , 2003 .

[19]  V. Jurdjevic Geometric control theory , 1996 .

[20]  J. Marsden,et al.  Introduction to mechanics and symmetry , 1994 .

[21]  H. Sussmann Orbits of families of vector fields and integrability of distributions , 1973 .

[22]  Marius Tucsnak,et al.  A control theoretic approach to the swimming of microscopic organisms , 2007 .

[23]  J. A. Sparenberg Survey of the mathematical theory of fish locomotion , 2002 .

[24]  G. Taylor Analysis of the swimming of long and narrow animals , 1952, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[25]  Joel W. Burdick,et al.  Propulsion and control of deformable bodies in an ideal fluid , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[26]  J. L. Nayler Mathematical Biofluiddynamics. Sir James Lighthill. Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia. 281 pp. Illustrated. , 1976, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[27]  H. Sussmann,et al.  Control systems on Lie groups , 1972 .

[28]  Clarence W. Rowley,et al.  Motion Planning for an Articulated Body in a Perfect Planar Fluid , 2006, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[29]  Marius Tucsnak,et al.  An Initial and Boundary Value Problem Modeling of Fish-like Swimming , 2008 .

[30]  E. Purcell Life at Low Reynolds Number , 2008 .

[31]  A. Isidori Nonlinear Control Systems: An Introduction , 1986 .

[32]  Keiji Kawachi,et al.  Regular Article: A Numerical Study of Undulatory Swimming , 1999 .

[33]  Stephen Childress Mechanics of swimming and flying: Preface , 1981 .

[34]  JUAN B. MELLI,et al.  MOTION PLANNING FOR AN ARTICULATED BODY IN A PERFECT FLUID , 2006 .

[35]  W. Rudin Real and complex analysis , 1968 .

[36]  Giovanni P. Galdi,et al.  On the Steady Self‐Propelled Motion of a Body in a Viscous Incompressible Fluid , 1999 .

[37]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  Three-dimensional flow structures and vorticity control in fish-like swimming , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  S. Childress Mechanics of swimming and flying: Frontmatter , 1977 .

[39]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Hydrodynamics of Fishlike Swimming , 2000 .

[40]  G. Taylor Analysis of the swimming of microscopic organisms , 1951, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[41]  F. Wilczek,et al.  Geometry of self-propulsion at low Reynolds number , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[42]  Alexandre Munnier,et al.  Locomotion of Deformable Bodies in an Ideal Fluid: Newtonian versus Lagrangian Formalisms , 2009, J. Nonlinear Sci..