Artistic Image Analysis Using the Composition of Human Figures

Artistic image understanding is an interdisciplinary research field of increasing importance for the computer vision and art history communities. One of the goals of this field is the implementation of a system that can automatically retrieve and annotate artistic images. The best approach in the field explores the artistic influence among different artistic images using graph-based learning methodologies that take into consideration appearance and label similarities, but the current state-of-the-art results indicate that there seems to be lots of room for improvements in terms of retrieval and annotation accuracy. In order to improve those results, we introduce novel human figure composition features that can compute the similarity between artistic images based on the location and number (i.e., composition) of human figures. Our main motivation for developing such features lies in the importance that composition (particularly the composition of human figures) has in the analysis of artistic images when defining the visual classes present in those images. We show that the introduction of such features in the current dominant methodology of the field improves significantly the state-of-the-art retrieval and annotation accuracies on the PRINTART database, which is a public database exclusively composed of artistic images.

[1]  Siwei Lyu,et al.  A digital technique for art authentication , 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[2]  Gerhard Goos,et al.  New Trends in Image Analysis and Processing – ICIAP 2013 , 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  James Ze Wang,et al.  Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends of the new age , 2008, CSUR.

[4]  Leo Grady,et al.  Random Walks for Image Segmentation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  David R. Bull,et al.  Projective image restoration using sparsity regularization , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[6]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[7]  D. Field,et al.  Mapping the similarity space of paintings: Image statistics and visual perception , 2010 .

[8]  David Nistér,et al.  Scalable Recognition with a Vocabulary Tree , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[9]  James Ze Wang,et al.  Studying digital imagery of ancient paintings by mixtures of stochastic models , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Emanuele Frontoni,et al.  Customers’ activity recognition in intelligent retail environments , 2013 .

[11]  Daniel J. Graham,et al.  Stylometrics of artwork: uses and limitations , 2010, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  Artistic Image Analysis Using Graph-Based Learning Approaches , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Matthieu Guillaumin,et al.  Segmentation Propagation in ImageNet , 2012, ECCV.

[14]  R. Arnheim Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye, New version , 1955 .

[15]  Alessio Del Bue,et al.  Artistic Image Classification: An Analysis on the PRINTART Database , 2012, ECCV.

[16]  Yuning Jiang,et al.  Learning Deep Face Representation , 2014, ArXiv.

[17]  Marchenko Yelizaveta,et al.  Semi-supervised annotation of brushwork in paintings domain using serial combinations of multiple experts , 2006, MM 2006.

[18]  Stefanie Nowak,et al.  Performance measures for multilabel evaluation: a case study in the area of image classification , 2010, MIR '10.

[19]  Shannon M. Hughes,et al.  Detection of forgery in paintings using supervised learning , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[20]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Robust Real-Time Face Detection , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[21]  Eric O. Postma,et al.  Computerized visual analysis of paintings , 2005 .

[22]  Babak Saleh,et al.  An Early Framework for Determining Artistic Influence , 2013, ICIAP Workshops.

[23]  Shannon M. Hughes,et al.  Stylistic analysis of paintings usingwavelets and machine learning , 2009, 2009 17th European Signal Processing Conference.

[24]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).