Comparative assessment of the surface topography for different optical profilometry techniques after dry turning of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Wang,et al. Surface integrity analysis for high-pressure jet assisted machined Ti-6Al-4V considering cooling pressures and injection positions , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Processes.
[2] R. Leach. Optical measurement of surface topography , 2011 .
[3] Stefania Bruschi,et al. Experimental investigation on the feasibility of dry and cryogenic machining as sustainable strategies when turning Ti6Al4V produced by Additive Manufacturing , 2017 .
[4] Liam Blunt,et al. Surface integrity of additive manufacturing parts: a comparison between optical topography measuring techniques , 2020 .
[5] Gerd Witt,et al. Characterization of typical surface effects in additive manufacturing with confocal microscopy , 2015 .
[6] Stanislaw Legutko,et al. Comparative assessment of the mechanical and electromagnetic surfaces of explosively clad Ti-steel plates after drilling process , 2017 .
[7] E. Feldshtein,et al. Studying the surface layers of products using a low-vacuum scanning electron microscope , 2014, Journal of Surface Investigation. X-ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques.
[8] Roman B. Statnikov,et al. Multicriteria Analysis in Engineering , 2002 .
[9] L. Qiu,et al. Laser differential confocal measurement of the outer surface profile of a laser inertial confinement fusion capsule , 2019, Measurement.
[10] Magdalena Niemczewska-Wójcik. Multi-sensor measurements of titanium alloy surface texture formed at subsequent operations of precision machining process , 2017 .
[11] N. Gubeljak,et al. Surface integrity and residual stress analysis of pulsed water jet peened stainless steel surfaces , 2019, Measurement.
[12] J. Sládek,et al. The measurement and analysis of surface geometric structure of ceramic femoral heads. , 2014, Scanning.
[13] S. Affatato,et al. Surface analysis on revised hip implants with stem taper for wear and failure incidence evaluation: A first investigation , 2019, Measurement.
[14] Eugene Feldshtein,et al. On the Chip Shaping and Surface Topography When Finish Cutting 17-4 PH Precipitation-Hardening Stainless Steel under Near-Dry Cutting Conditions , 2020, Materials.
[15] Wuyi Chen,et al. Research on surface integrity of turning titanium alloy TB6 , 2018 .
[16] Xingsheng Wang,et al. Finite element simulation of surface roughness in diamond turning of spherical surfaces , 2018 .
[17] M. Niemczewska-Wójcik. The influence of the surface geometric structure on the functionality of implants , 2011 .
[18] A. G. Jaharah,et al. Machinalibilty of Ti-6Al-4V Under Dry and Near Dry Condition Using Carbide Tools , 2009 .
[19] Zhanqiang Liu,et al. Modeling and prediction for 3D surface topography in finish turning with conventional and wiper inserts , 2016 .
[20] Bing Wang,et al. Investigation of surface topography and its deterioration resulting from tool wear evolution when dry turning of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V , 2019, Tribology International.
[21] Konstantinos Grigoriadis. Use of laser interferometry for measuring concrete substrate roughness in patch repairs , 2016 .
[22] S. Bruschi,et al. Temperature effects on the Ti6Al4V machinability using cooled gaseous nitrogen in semi-finishing turning , 2017 .
[23] A. Weckenmann,et al. Probing Systems in Dimensional Metrology , 2004 .
[24] Stefania Bruschi,et al. Solid Lubricant-assisted Minimum Quantity Lubrication and Cooling strategies to improve Ti6Al4V machinability in finishing turning , 2018 .
[25] Liam Blunt,et al. Areal topography measurement of metal additive surfaces using focus variation microscopy , 2019, Additive Manufacturing.
[26] Stefania Bruschi,et al. Analysis of the Surface Integrity in Cryogenic Turning of Ti6Al4 V Produced by Direct Melting Laser Sintering , 2016 .