JBR: A reassessment of concept familiarity and a category-specific disorder for living things

Abstract JBR, a classic case of a category-specific disorder for living things reported by Warrington and Shallice (Brain 1984; 107: 829-54), was reassessed to establish whether differences in concept familiarity could account for his disorder. JBR's ability to name and define living and non-living things deteriorated with decreasing levels of familiarity, but was significantly more impaired for living things in the low familiarity range; no category-specific effect was apparent for highly familiar items. Possible confounding effects arising from the greater visual complexlty and visual similarity of living things could not account for the findings. Further investigations showed that JBR's disorder for living things could not be explained in terms of a specific loss of visual feature knowledge. Normal controls also showed a disparity between their naming of living and non-living things rated equivalently for familiarity, indicating that JBR's category disorder was not necessarily pathological in nature. I...

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. , 1991 .

[2]  Elizabeth K. Warrington,et al.  Neuropsychological studies of verbal semantic systems , 1981 .

[3]  E. Capitani,et al.  Living and non-living categories. Is there a “normal” asymmetry? , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Elaine Funnell,et al.  Categories of knowledge? unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things , 1992 .

[5]  F. Lucchelli,et al.  Are Semantic Systems Separately Represented in the Brain? The Case of Living Category Impairment , 1994, Cortex.

[6]  Guido Gainotti,et al.  Cognitive and anatomical locus of lesion in a patient with a category-specific semantic impairment for living beings , 1996 .

[7]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  The validity of age-of-acquisition ratings , 1980 .

[8]  R. Job,et al.  Category-specific form-knowledge deficit in a patient with herpes simplex virus encephalitis , 1993 .

[9]  M. Silveri,et al.  Interaction between vision and language in category-specific semantic impairment , 1988 .

[10]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Semantic systems or system? Neuropsychological evidence re-examined , 1988 .

[11]  A. Sirigu,et al.  The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  David Gaffan,et al.  A Spurious Category-Specific Visual Agnosia for Living Things in Normal Human and Nonhuman Primates , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  E. Warrington,et al.  Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  M. Gernsbacher.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? , 1990 .

[16]  E. Funnell.  Objects and properties: a study of the breakdown of semantic memory. , 1995, Memory.

[17]  P. McKenna,et al.  Category specificity in the naming of natural and man-made objects: Normative data from adults and children , 1994 .

[18]  A. Bhalla,et al.  Behaviour disturbances during recovery from herpes simplex encephalitis. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Category-specificity and modality-specificity in semantic memory , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .

[21]  E Capitani,et al.  Progressive language impairment without dementia: a case with isolated category specific semantic defect. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  A J Parkin,et al.  Naming Impairments following Recovery from Herpes Simplex Encephalitis: Category-Specific? , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.