OpenSim as a preliminary kinematic testing platform for the development of total knee arthroplasty implants.

The design of a total knee replacement implant needs to take account the complex surfaces of the knee which it is replacing. Ensuring design performance of the implant requires in vitro testing of the implant. A considerable amount of time is required to produce components and evaluate them inside an experimental setting. Numerous adjustments in the design of an implant and testing each individual design can be time consuming and expensive. Our solution is to use the OpenSim simulation software to rapidly test multiple design configurations of implants. This study modeled a testing rig which characterized the motion and laxity of knee implants. Three different knee implant designs were used to test and validate the accuracy of the simulation: symmetrical, asymmetric, and anatomic. Kinematics were described as distances measured from the center of each femoral condyle to a plane intersecting the most posterior points of the tibial condyles between 0 and 135° of flexion with 15° increments. Excluding the initial flexion measurement (∼0°) results, the absolute differences between all experimental and simulation results (neutral path, anterior-posterior shear, internal-external torque) for the symmetric, asymmetric, and anatomical designs were 1.98 mm ± 1.15, 1.17 mm ± 0.89, and 1.24 mm ± 0.97, respectively. Considering all designs, the accuracy of the simulation across all tests was 1.46 mm ± 1.07. It was concluded that the results of the simulation were an acceptable representation of the testing rig and hence applicable as a design tool for new total knees.

[1]  Grant Trewartha,et al.  Cervical Spine Injuries: A Whole-Body Musculoskeletal Model for the Analysis of Spinal Loading , 2017, PloS one.

[2]  Jason P. Halloran,et al.  Comparison of deformable and elastic foundation finite element simulations for predicting knee replacement mechanics. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  Peter S. Walker,et al.  Replication and Substitution of Anatomic Stabilizing Mechanisms in a Total Knee Design , 2017 .

[4]  R. Komistek,et al.  In Vivo Kinematic Comparison of a Bicruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty and the Normal Knee Using Fluoroscopy. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  P. Walker,et al.  Characterising knee motion and laxity in a testing machine for application to total knee evaluation. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Michael A Sherman,et al.  Simbody: multibody dynamics for biomedical research. , 2011, Procedia IUTAM.

[7]  Dan Negrut,et al.  Efficient computation of cartilage contact pressures within dynamic simulations of movement , 2018, Comput. methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis..

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Measurement error , 1996 .

[9]  L Blankevoort,et al.  Ligament-bone interaction in a three-dimensional model of the knee. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  Ricardo Matias,et al.  A Biomechanical Model of the Scapulothoracic Joint to Accurately Capture Scapular Kinematics during Shoulder Movements , 2016, PloS one.

[11]  I. Jonkers,et al.  Control of propulsion and body lift during the first two stances of sprint running: a simulation study , 2015, Journal of sports sciences.

[12]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  Dynamic finite element knee simulation for evaluation of knee replacement mechanics. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  E. Kolos,et al.  Variability in static alignment and kinematics for kinematically aligned TKA. , 2017, The Knee.

[14]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  A Combined Experimental and Computational Approach to Subject-Specific Analysis of Knee Joint Laxity. , 2016, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  Jeffrey A Reinbolt,et al.  OpenSim: a musculoskeletal modeling and simulation framework for in silico investigations and exchange. , 2011, Procedia IUTAM.

[16]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  H. Rubash,et al.  Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Stephen J Piazza,et al.  Computational assessment of constraint in total knee replacement. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Ajay Seth,et al.  Minimal formulation of joint motion for biomechanisms , 2010, Nonlinear dynamics.

[20]  Ganesh Thiagarajan,et al.  A multibody knee model with discrete cartilage prediction of tibio-femoral contact mechanics , 2013, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[21]  S L Woo,et al.  A validated three-dimensional computational model of a human knee joint. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  Michael W Hast,et al.  Biomechanical effects of total knee arthroplasty component malrotation: A computational simulation , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  Y. Koga,et al.  The clinical epicondylar axis is not the functional flexion axis of the human knee , 2014, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[24]  P. Walker,et al.  A computer model with surface friction for the prediction of total knee kinematics. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Huayue Chen,et al.  Morphologic study of the lateral and medial collateral ligaments of the human knee. , 2007, Okajimas folia anatomica Japonica.

[26]  Shahram Amiri,et al.  Conceptual Design for Condylar Guiding Features of a Total Knee Replacement , 2011 .

[27]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Young's modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  Validation of a new computational 6-DOF knee simulator during dynamic activities. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  V Pinskerova,et al.  Does the femur roll-back with flexion? , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.