Economic and life cycle assessment of recycling municipal glass as a pozzolan in portland cement concrete production

Abstract The environmental and economic qualities associated with processing recycled glass cullet recovered from a municipal solid waste (MSW) materials recovery facility (MRF) into glass powder (GP) to be used as a pozzolanic material in the production of portland cement concrete were assessed. Through an evaluation of life cycle impacts and system costs, the feasibility of a potential pozzolan market was evaluated in comparison to the two most common management strategies for recycled glass cullet: (1) traditional recycling into new glass containers, and (2) disposal to a landfill (including potential use as landfill depression fill material). The investment of a MRF in a GP processing system became feasible if at least 50,000 metric tonnes (tonnes) of cullet were processed annually (based on a 10-year lifespan and 4500 h per year plant operating time). At this annual throughput capacity, a MRF could achieve a processing cost capable of producing GP at a cost competitive with the current retail value of Class F coal fly ash, another known pozzolan. GP processing costs decreased as annual cullet throughput increased. The feasibility of such a GP pozzolan market was further analyzed through an applied case study of MRF cullet availability in North Central Florida, USA.

[1]  Ahmad Shayan,et al.  Value-added Utilisation of Waste Glass in Concrete , 2002 .

[2]  Caijun Shi,et al.  Characteristics and pozzolanic reactivity of glass powders , 2005 .

[3]  Yixin Shao,et al.  Studies on concrete containing ground waste glass , 2000 .

[4]  Robert S Blissett,et al.  A review of the multi-component utilisation of coal fly ash , 2012 .

[5]  Keren Zheng,et al.  Pozzolanic reaction of glass powder and its role in controlling alkali–silica reaction , 2016 .

[6]  Arezki Tagnit-Hamou,et al.  Pozzolanic properties of fine and coarse color-mixed glass cullet , 2011 .

[7]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional, Glass Powder, and Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete and Mortar , 2014 .

[8]  Christopher C. Ferraro,et al.  Use of Waste to Energy Bottom Ash as an Aggregate in Portland Cement Concrete: Impacts of Size Fractionation and Carbonation , 2016 .

[9]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of central sorting at material recovery facilities: the case of lightweight packaging waste , 2016 .

[10]  Guohua Chen,et al.  Glass recycling in cement production--an innovative approach. , 2002, Waste management.

[11]  Phillip N Pressley,et al.  Analysis of material recovery facilities for use in life-cycle assessment. , 2015, Waste management.

[12]  Mariano Angelo Zanini,et al.  Sustainable management and supply of natural and recycled aggregates in a medium-size integrated plant. , 2016, Waste management.

[13]  Ahmad Shayan,et al.  Performance of glass powder as a pozzolanic material in concrete: A field trial on concrete slabs , 2006 .

[14]  Anthony Rush Combs,et al.  Life Cycle Analysis of Recycling Facilities in a Carbon Constrained World. , 2011 .

[15]  Gregor Fischer,et al.  Investigating the Alkali Silica Reaction of Recycled Glass Aggregates in Concrete Materials , 2010 .

[16]  R. Detwiler,et al.  SUPPLEMENTARY CEMENTING MATERIALS FOR USE IN BLENDED CEMENTS , 1996 .

[17]  M. W. Bo,et al.  Recycled crushed glass in road work applications. , 2011, Waste management.