Organisational analysis: A process-based model for concurrent engineering environments

Organisational issues present the main barriers to the implementation of concurrent engineering (CE) to new product development (NPD) processes in manufacturing organisations. Both research and practice have demonstrated that companies that invest in improving organisational development issues fare better than those that rely purely on tools and technology alone. The key issues are improving cross‐functional integration and developing social mechanisms that facilitate a collaborative environment. Organisational analysis represents the first step an organisation can take in order to improvement its effectiveness. Organisational analysis techniques have been a field of study for many years, resulting in the development of a number of different methodologies ranging from purely mathematical models of analysis to heuristic models using simulation. This paper presents a methodology that draws upon traditional organisational theory and combines it with the more recent business process re‐engineering approaches for the analysis of organisational issues in a CE environment. The methodology is based on the hierarchical modelling and analysis of the business process. A detailed case study of its application in industry is presented. The paper concludes by summarising the key features of the methodology and issues emerging from its implementation.

[1]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  New product development practices in American and British firms , 2000 .

[2]  M. C. Knowles,et al.  Improving Organisational Effectiveness Through Organisational Analysis , 1997 .

[3]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[4]  Michael I. Harrison,et al.  Diagnosing Organizations: Methods, Models, and Processes , 1987 .

[5]  R. W. Hanssen Reducing delivery times in engineer-to-order firms by using the concepts of concurrent engineering , 1997 .

[6]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[7]  Ian M. Mitchell,et al.  Strategic Organization Design: Concepts, Tools & Processes , 1990 .

[8]  R. Teare,et al.  A systems model of effective teamwork , 1997 .

[9]  M. Hammer,et al.  REENGINEERING THE CORPORATION: A MANIFESTO FOR BUSINESS REVOLUTION , 1995 .

[10]  Vic Gilgeous Workshops for improving manufacturing effectiveness , 1995 .

[11]  Hans-Jörg Bullinger,et al.  Concepts and methods for a production integrated environmental protection , 1999 .

[12]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  The Virtual Design Team: Modeling organizational behavior of concurrent design teams , 1995, Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf..

[13]  Judith Anne White Applying an Experiential Learning Styles Framework to Management and Professional Development , 1992 .

[14]  Kulwant S. Pawar,et al.  Product design as a means of integrating differentiation , 1996 .

[15]  Andrew J. DuBrin,et al.  Fundamentals of organizational behavior: An applied perspective , 1974 .

[16]  Richard J. Mayer,et al.  Information Integration for Concurrent Engineering (IICE) IDEF3 Process Description Capture Method Report , 1992 .

[17]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Strategic organization design , 1988 .

[18]  Hans-Jörg Bullinger,et al.  Turbulent times require creative thinking: New European concepts in production management , 1999 .

[19]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools , 1997, MIS Q..

[20]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[21]  Chon-Huat Goh,et al.  A Hierarchical System of Performance Measures for Concurrent Engineering , 1997 .

[22]  H. Maylor Concurrent new product development: an empirical assessment , 1997 .

[23]  Kulwant S. Pawar,et al.  Establishing Concordance within Concurrent Engineering Teams , 1999 .

[24]  R. Heck,et al.  Organizational Culture and Performance: Proposing and Testing a Model , 1993 .

[25]  Chris J. Backhouse,et al.  Understanding concurrent engineering implementation: A case-study approach , 1998 .

[26]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[27]  Donald E. Carter,et al.  Ce Concurrent Engineering: The Product Development Environment for the 1990s , 1992 .

[28]  D. S. Sink,et al.  Planning and Measurement in Your Organization of the Future , 1989 .

[29]  D. Dougherty Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[30]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Modeling the Performance of Organizational Structures , 1988, Oper. Res..

[31]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Another look at how Toyota integrates product development , 1998 .

[32]  I. C. Kerssens-van Drongelen,et al.  R&D Performance Measurement in Large and Medium-Sized Dutch Companies , 1996 .

[33]  Matthew Ainscough,et al.  Concurrent Engineering within British Industry , 2000, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[34]  R. Ackoff Towards a System of Systems Concepts , 1971 .

[35]  Victor Paashuis The Organisation of Integrated Product Development , 1997 .

[36]  Jan Bilderbeek,et al.  R&D Performance Measurement: More than Choosing a Set of Metrics , 1997 .

[37]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[38]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[39]  Levent V. Orman,et al.  A Model Management Approach to Business Process Reengineering , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Paul Forrester,et al.  Organizational growth demands concurrent engineering , 1997 .

[41]  John M. Wilson,et al.  Business Processes: Modelling and Analysis for Re-engineering and Improvement , 1995 .